Channel
@DDDagmol
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
96subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002210853718 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DDDagmol |
| Description | Речь — кинжал. Здесь мы его затачиваем. Канал ораторского клуба DAGMOL. Учимся не просто говорить, а управлять вниманием аудитории на сцене КПЦ, совещании в Zoom и улицах Махачкалы. На связи @justdarkquantum |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DDDagmol |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 96 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 96 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
200 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 70 | 35.0% | |
| 🔥 | 50 | 25.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 20 | 10.0% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 9.00% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 4.50% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 4.00% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 3.50% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 2.50% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 2.00% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.50% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 1.00% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.00% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.5% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2024 to 21 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В каком лагере будешь завтра?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🟡Почему блогер, возмутившийся отключением света на Редухе, оказался эффективнее сотни официальных жалоб? 🟡Общественный контроль Дагестана — реальная сила или гневные смайлики под постами Тут Дагестан? 🟡Наш сабур — это мудрость или оправдание равнодушия? Завтра || 15:00 || КПЦ «Единство» Вопросы, идеи, предложения и уточнения всегда приветствуются в комментариях, чате дагмола или лс @justdarkquantum. Регистрации нет…
⚡2❤2🔥2
До сих пор мы публиковали здесь только анонсы. Это было полезно, но недостаточно. Знать, когда будут дебаты и дискуссии — это одно, умение видеть манипуляции и когнитивные искажения в речи оппонента или начальника — другое. 🙏 Потому что дебаты — это не просто хобби на выходные. Это навык уметь вовремя отследить манипуляцию, переиграть оппонента в переговорах или отстоять свои границы в жестком споре. Теперь здесь …
❤4🔥2❤🔥1🎉1👍1🤨1
Контроль ценностей — это признак силы или симптом умирания?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔴 Если соблюдение ценностей нужно контролировать — значит ли это, что они уже не работают сами по себе? 🔴 Существует мнение: как только культуре требуется надзор, она превращается из «внутреннего компаса» в «внешний регламент». Но есть и контраргумент — даже самый совершенный закон требует исполнения, а значит, и надзора. Где проходит граница между «живой традицией» и «принудительным этикетом»? Если мы перестанем к…
А судьи кто? «Не надену эту толстовку, а то спросят за нефора», «ты же девочка, иди в медицинский, какой инженер?» — волей или неволей мы оглядываемся на общественное мнение во всех сферах своей жизни. В Китае активно вводят систему социального рейтинга. Дагестан живет в этой антиутопии веками. Выбор профессии, спутника жизни и даже места жительства диктуется коллективным бессознательным родственников. Общественно…
🔥4❤3👍2❤🔥1
Мы теряем Дагестан, стыдясь быть дагестанцами? Нефоры — распад дагестанской культуры или её перерождение? «Не позорь семью» | «Так не принято» | «Что люди скажут?» Мы говорим: «надо сохранять традиции». Но что, если их приходится навязывать? Значит ли это, что они перестали быть естественной частью нас? Или, наоборот, что мы стали слишком слабы, чтобы нести то, что строило поколения? Заглянем за кулисы завтрашни…
❤🔥3👍2🔥2❤1
Придешь на мероприятие в субботу 8.11?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Предки учили стойкости, тикток учит самовыражению. Горы учили силе, Гай Ричи — вроде бы тому же. Аулы хранили традиции и прислушивались к людскому мнению, город ценит индивидуальность и свободу каждого. Следует ли навязывать ценности молодежи? И где они, истинные ценности Дагестана? 📇Что? Дебаты «Следует ли принуждать молодых людей следовать ценностям и традициям Дагестана?» 🤩Где? КПЦ Единство, Московский просп., …
❤🔥2🔥2🤔1
🏔 Туризм в Дагестане: проблемы, вызовы, перспективы Дагестан — край величественных гор, седого Каспия и богатого культурного наследия. Но как развивать туризм, сохраняя природу и культуру? Как сделать так, чтобы он развивал экономику, а не раздувал цены, создавал возможности, а не перегружал инфраструктуру, сохранял культуру, а не превращал традиции в туристический аттракцион? Сформулируем проблемы, обсудим реальн…
❤9❤🔥4🔥4🤣4🤔1
Signed Khadzhik
⚡️ Дорогие студенты Москвы! 😍 Приглашаем вас на очередную встречу в рамках программы «Диалог на равных с молодежью», где вы сможете пообщаться с интересными общественными и политическими деятелями и задать им ваши вопросы! 📆 Дата: 14 февраля 🕰️ Сбор гостей: 16:00 📍 Место: Московский проспект, 2 (КПЦ«Единство») Программа мероприятия: 1. Диалог с приглашенными гостями и сессия вопросов и ответов. 2. Вкусный фуршет. …
❤4🔥3❤🔥2👏1
Signed Гамид Гасаев
Темы
The shares total 194%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍2
Signed Гамид Гасаев
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DDDagmol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В каком лагере будешь завтра?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Контроль ценностей — это признак силы или симптом умирания?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Придешь на мероприятие в субботу 8.11?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Темы
The shares total 194%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Придешь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2024 to 21 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 932,523 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ораторы :: Дагмол” (@DDDagmol), 96 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DDDagmol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.