Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

☀️ ࣪𓏲ּ ֶָ 𝔇𝗔𝗭𝗭𝔏𝔗 ☔️ ✶⋆.˚

@DAZZLI_oi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

51subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002639409598
TypeChannel
Username@DAZZLI_oi
Description⸺ ᴄᴛудия ᴏɜʙучᴋи ᴨᴏд ᴨᴩᴏᴛᴏᴛиᴨᴏʍ ᴦᴩуᴨᴨы Nᴇwjᴇᴀns
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/DAZZLI_oi

Growth

5112 Aug 2026, 02:49 — 51 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 03:00 — 51 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 02:4912 Aug 2026, 03:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50–52 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:0051no change
12 Aug 2026, 02:4951first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
118
Videos
14
Links
27

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 21s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💅2720.5%
👾2418.2%
🏆2015.2%
1511.4%
😈139.85%
🦄129.09%
🌭75.30%
👀43.03%
👻43.03%
🎃32.27%
🕊21.52%
💘10.758%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 9 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Nov 2025, 14:13 UTC200 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

.. ⋆ 𝑊𝑒𝑎𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 : .... — 𑁯ᰍ ࣪ 💫 ກ౿໖ ౿ཞค ૂ ࣪᪥ 𒀭࣪⋆ էჩᤉ δᥱsᴛ ᥎᧐iᥴᥱ-᧐᥎ᥱr ᥉էսძ𐌠ჿ ♪ ִᤳ‌ ‌𝅄 🪁୧୧ #DAZZLI 𐌽𝕖𝕨 ᕈ𝕠𝕤𝕥 ⚞ ৲𖧵ֹֺֽ໋໋݊ 𓄹𓈒 💛 ᗪᎯℤℤ𝑳𝓘 ⲏⲁ ⲙⲉⲥⲧⲉ ᥴ᧐ᤋдᥲёⲙ ʙ᧐᧘ɯᥱδᥴᴛʙ᧐ ⲃⲙⲉⲥⲧⲉ 💜 ྀི~ ୭ ˚. ᵎᵎ &࣪. ˖⁺ (🫧) ... Н𐌏𐌱ⲀЯ 𐌏𝟑𐌱Ⲩ𐍁𐌺Ⲁ ‧₊✦˚‧ «Ⲱᴀнᴇᴧь ᴏбᴇᴩᴧин» - ꪀꪋꪑꫀ 𓏲 ‘ . 🌼 ゟⲉⲅυ ⲥⲗⲩⲱⲁⲧь ⲥⲕⲟⲣⲉⲉ !¡ ˚₊ ꕤ˵꒱ [☀️]✧༘⋆ ßჄ: #nella 🪻 #voice ✨ 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓫𝓮𝓼𝓽 (𝟢𝟩.𝟣𝟣.𝟤𝟧) ** 𝘕𝘑𝘡 . ⩇‌⩇‌ ۫ ݂ ֺ(のᥲვვ᥈ս) ۠ ֹ ‌☔️ ּ. 𖦆᮫ 𝆬 .

👾75💅5🏆1🦄1😈1

7 Nov 2025, 06:25 UTC160 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ПᏢᏫᏴᎬᏢᏦᎪ ᎪᏦᎢИᏴᎻᏫᏟᎢИ❤️‍🔥 ʙᴀɯᴀ ɜᴀдᴀчᴀ нᴀᴄᴛᴀʙиᴛь ʍᴀᴋᴄиʍᴀᴧьнᴏᴇ ᴋᴏᴧ-ʙᴏ ᴩᴇᴀᴋций и ᴋᴏʍʍᴇнᴛᴀᴩиᴇʙ.🫶

8🏆7💅6😈5👀4👻4🌭3👾3

6 Nov 2025, 17:32 UTC141 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🐧:: спасибо большое даззи за анончик, очень классно провели время 💜 сладких снов вам =]

💅2🦄2

6 Nov 2025, 16:19 UTC142 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

.. ⋆ 𝑊𝑒𝑎𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 : .... — 𑁯ᰍ ࣪ 💫 ກ౿໖ ౿ཞค ૂ ࣪᪥ 𒀭࣪⋆ էჩᤉ δᥱsᴛ ᥎᧐iᥴᥱ-᧐᥎ᥱr ᥉էսძ𐌠ჿ ♪ ִᤳ‌ ‌𝅄 🪁୧୧ #DAZZLI 𐌽𝕖𝕨 ᕈ𝕠𝕤𝕥 ⚞ ৲𖧵ֹֺֽ໋໋݊ 𓄹𓈒 💛 ᗪᎯℤℤ𝑳𝓘 ⲏⲁ ⲙⲉⲥⲧⲉ ᥴ᧐ᤋдᥲёⲙ ʙ᧐᧘ɯᥱδᥴᴛʙ᧐ ⲃⲙⲉⲥⲧⲉ 💜 ྀི~ ୭ ˚. ᵎᵎ ‌ೋ ⋱ Ⲙы ⲣⲉⲱυⲗυ ⲡⲣⲟⲃⲉⲥⲧυ ⲁⲏⲟⲏυⲙ-ⲧⲁύⲙ. Ⲏⲉ ⲃыⲥⲧⲁⲃⲗяⲉⲙ: 18+ ⲥⲟⲟ, ⲟⲥⲕⲟⲣⳝⲗⲉⲏυя, ⲭⲉύⲧ [⚡️] ⁹ ۫‌ይ 𝅄 🫧 𓈒 𔓘‌ ִ Ⲁⲏⲟⲏⲕυ: ЗАКРЫТО ⲏ૯ʌʌɑ — @закрыто 🪷 ɸ϶ɾςς — @закрыто 🪅 ϶ύⲙυ — @закрыто 🐧 ɞ૯ƿ૦ⲏɑ — @закрыто 🚬 [☀️]✧༘⋆ ßჄ: #all 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓫𝓮𝓼𝓽 (𝟢𝟨.𝟣𝟣.𝟤𝟧) ** 𝘕𝘑𝘡 .

💅4🦄2😈2👾1

6 Nov 2025, 14:14 UTC101 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

.. ⋆ 𝑊𝑒𝑎𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 : .... — 𑁯ᰍ ࣪ 💫 ກ౿໖ ౿ཞค ૂ ࣪᪥ 𒀭࣪⋆ էჩᤉ δᥱsᴛ ᥎᧐iᥴᥱ-᧐᥎ᥱr ᥉էսძ𐌠ჿ ♪ ִᤳ‌ ‌𝅄 🪁୧୧ #DAZZLI 𐌽𝕖𝕨 ᕈ𝕠𝕤𝕥 ⚞ ৲𖧵ֹֺֽ໋໋݊ 𓄹𓈒 💛 ᗪᎯℤℤ𝑳𝓘 ⲏⲁ ⲙⲉⲥⲧⲉ ᥴ᧐ᤋдᥲёⲙ ʙ᧐᧘ɯᥱδᥴᴛʙ᧐ ⲃⲙⲉⲥⲧⲉ 💜 ྀི~ ୭ ˚. ᵎᵎ ꒰♡ ... Ͳʝӄ Ͳσӄ 𝑼𝑷𝑫𝑨𝑻𝑬 ︵ 🌂. げて -⚡️} 𐌺ᥲκ учᥲᥴᴛнᥙцы ᥰ᧐дᥰᥙᥴᥲны дρуᴦ у дρуᴦᥲ ʙ ᴛᴦ .... 𓇼 ྀི꒱ა ℕ𝕖𝕨 𝕧𝕚𝕕𝕖𝕠 ୭ ˚👾. ᵎᵎ ⭐️ ゟⲉⲅυ ⲥⲙⲟⲧⲣⲉⲧь ⲥⲕⲟⲣⲉⲉ !¡ ∝ ೄ ※ [☀️]✧༘⋆ ßჄ: #all 🪻 #video ✨ 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓫𝓮𝓼𝓽 (𝟢𝟨.𝟣𝟣.𝟤𝟧) ** 𝘕𝘑𝘡 . ⩇‌⩇‌ ۫ ݂ ֺ(のᥲვვ᥈ս) ۠ ֹ ‌☔️ ּ. 𖦆᮫ 𝆬 .

🏆7👾5🌭42💅2🦄2😈2

5 Nov 2025, 12:07 UTC86 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

.. ⋆ 𝑊𝑒𝑎𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 : .... — 𑁯ᰍ ࣪ 💫 ກ౿໖ ౿ཞค ૂ ࣪᪥ 𒀭࣪⋆ էჩᤉ δᥱsᴛ ᥎᧐iᥴᥱ-᧐᥎ᥱr ᥉էսძ𐌠ჿ ♪ ִᤳ‌ ‌𝅄 🪁୧୧ #DAZZLI 𐌽𝕖𝕨 ᕈ𝕠𝕤𝕥 ⚞ ৲𖧵ֹֺֽ໋໋݊ 𓄹𓈒 💛 ᗪᎯℤℤ𝑳𝓘 ⲏⲁ ⲙⲉⲥⲧⲉ ᥴ᧐ᤋдᥲёⲙ ʙ᧐᧘ɯᥱδᥴᴛʙ᧐ ⲃⲙⲉⲥⲧⲉ 💜 ྀི~ ୭ ˚. ᵎᵎ &࣪. ˖⁺ (🫧) ... Н𐌏𐌱ⲀЯ 𐌏𝟑𐌱Ⲩ𐍁𐌺Ⲁ ‧₊✦˚‧ «Ибᴩᴀᴦиʍ» - ꪀꪋꪑꫀ 𓏲 ‘ . 🌼 ゟⲉⲅυ ⲥⲗⲩⲱⲁⲧь ⲥⲕⲟⲣⲉⲉ !¡ ˚₊ ꕤ˵꒱ [☀️]✧༘⋆ ßჄ: #nella 🪻 #voice ✨ 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓫𝓮𝓼𝓽 (𝟢𝟧.𝟣𝟣.𝟤𝟧) ** 𝘕𝘑𝘡 . ⩇‌⩇‌ ۫ ݂ ֺ(のᥲვვ᥈ս) ۠ ֹ ‌☔️ ּ. 𖦆᮫ 𝆬 .

👾3🏆2💅2💘1🦄1😈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @DAZZLI_oi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 738,125 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“☀️ ࣪𓏲ּ ֶָ 𝔇𝗔𝗭𝗭𝔏𝔗 ☔️ ✶⋆.˚” (@DAZZLI_oi), 51 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DAZZLI_oi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.