Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Гнездилище сцинка РЕСТ!!!!

@CzNnk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003848271182
TypeChannel
Username@CzNnk
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/CzNnk

Growth

289 August 2026 — 28 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28 subscribers9 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27–29 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 06:4528no change
9 Aug 2026, 18:1728first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
135.1%
avg views ÷ 28 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.8
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held12 (20 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total454
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
148
Videos
12
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5368436393871700187722.6%
custom 5368420596981988451619.4%
custom 5368576676093523690619.4%
custom 524900960123122469139.68%
custom 525370456312645216639.68%
custom 536840657820873156739.68%
custom 536845697106001572039.68%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC15 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

И так... На один год ближе к пенсии 🤩С днем рождения меня!! Спасибо родные, что поздравили. Пока день идёт на перекосяк. Однако я верю, что всё наладится.

custom 53684065782087315672custom 53685766760935236902custom 52490096012312246911

3 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC22 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

В общем, сейчас у меня нет косплеев с собой. Они в Питере пока (спасибо, дорогая грузоперевозка) . Соответственно, я черпаю идеи с идентити. Может вкину целый лист с коспланами. Ибо тот, что в закрепе уже не актуален

custom 53684363938717001872

2 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC27 viewsread 11 August 2026

Я сделаю вот так вот, якобы случайно

2 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC28 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @birthhday_bot

🎉 До вашего дня рождения осталось 3 дня!

31 Jul 2026, 18:50 UTC32 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

А чтовы хотите тут увидеть? Грустный пост? не, не судьба. В августе того года я приехала в мск и под август этого свалила с него. Хочу сказать, что сутки в двухэтажном поезде (причем купе) оказались не хуже консервной банки : пьяные мужики, вонь, противные попутчики, отсутствие еды и пространства. Пока я ехала, думала какой блэкаут Вам сделать, в итоге не надумала. Все, кого я достала своим присутствием извиняйте

custom 53684363938717001872

29 Jul 2026, 15:49 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Вы здесь, а меня уже нет

custom 53685766760935236901

28 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC38 viewsread 11 August 2026

Я не буду пока выкладывать фото Давайте поговорим о насущном... Где искать посредника для тао бао 😨

26 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC48 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53684205969819884512custom 53684363938717001871

26 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Мы не выдвинулись, Шерлок.

custom 53684205969819884511

23 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC60 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Анонс 🪨🪨🪨Рᴇбяᴛ, ну ʙозᴩᴀᴄᴛу нужно 🪨🪨🪨 ᴄооᴛʙᴇᴛᴄᴛʙоʙᴀᴛь.... По϶ᴛоʍу я буду 26.07 нᴀ ᴋиᴋо ʙ ᴋоᴄᴨᴧᴇᴇ ʙᴇᴧиᴋоᴦо дᴇдᴀ! Буду рада провести этот день в компании прелестной Тарталетки🥺

custom 53684569710600157203custom 52537045631264521662custom 53684205969819884512custom 53684363938717001872custom 52490096012312246911custom 53684065782087315671

20 Jul 2026, 19:40 UTC59 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Чтож.. Прошёл день с кошачьей вечеринки(вечера встреч и семьи). Отдельная благодарность Реки за столь прекрасный парик. Лично мне, данное мероприятие вызвало чувство отторжения. Благо я находилась со своими друзьями, так бы неприменно пришла-ушла. Я ни копеички не потратила на это днище. Организация - говно Людей -мало Музыка и развлечения? - тухло. Если Вы так ненавидите свою аудиторию и хотите сэкономить на н

custom 53685766760935236903custom 52490096012312246911custom 52537045631264521661custom 53684205969819884511

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @CzNnk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 735,872 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гнездилище сцинка РЕСТ!!!!” (@CzNnk), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CzNnk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.