Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CyberRanked | Standoff 2

Channel

CyberRanked | Standoff 2

@CyberRanked

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

519subscribers

-73 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002292938019
TypeChannel
Username@CyberRanked
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/CyberRanked

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

519592555.57 August 2026 — 592 subscribers7 August 2026 — 591 subscribers8 August 2026 — 591 subscribers14 August 2026 — 585 subscribers21 August 2026 — 577 subscribers28 August 2026 — 574 subscribers3 September 2026 — 567 subscribers12 September 2026 — 556 subscribers2 October 2026 — 532 subscribers11 October 2026 — 519 subscribers7 August 202611 October 2026
10 measurements spanning 65 days, net -73. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 508–603 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 22:57519-13
2 Oct 2026, 01:18532-24
12 Sept 2026, 08:00556-11
3 Sept 2026, 08:17567-7
28 Aug 2026, 02:44574-3
21 Aug 2026, 12:07577-8
14 Aug 2026, 12:46585-6
8 Aug 2026, 03:18591no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:30591-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:03592first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

210 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5267036764383509971210100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 29 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CyberRanked. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 January 2026 to 29 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.56%
1 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,070
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
838
over 15 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 29 January 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

29 Jan 2026, 12:06 UTC757 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔴НУЖЕН ЛИ ВАМ ЭТОТ БОТ? Мы вкладываем время и ресурсы в развитие бота для тренировок @CRTraning_bot, который должен был упростить поиск команды и праков. Но мы хотим знать наверняка. Давайте честно: ❓Вы им пользуетесь? ❓Он реально экономит ваше время и помогает найти игру? 😀Или это просто ещё один инструмент, который проще игнорировать, чем все эти чаты? Ваш ответ определит будущее этого направления. Если бот не р…

custom 52670367643835099718

27 Jan 2026, 16:41 UTC≈1,070 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

🔴Анонс турнира Dushegublle Tournament: season 1 Формат: 5/5 Призовой фонд: 16000 голды 1 место: 8000 голды 2 место: 5000 голды 3 место: 3000 голды 12 приглашенных команд в основную стадию + 4 команды прошедшие открытые квалификации Всего будет 4 квалификации и из каждой выйдет 1 победившая команда Единственное условие участия: Иметь подписку на наш Телеграм канал. 📝Список приглашенных команд: [F7] Foxes 7 [MVCK] Ma…

custom 526703676438350997112

24 Jan 2026, 18:54 UTC818 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Очень пугает развитие Standoff 2....

custom 526703676438350997118

16 Jan 2026, 13:19 UTC≈1,150 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🛡️МНЕНИЕ О СОСТОЯНИИ STANDOFF 2 И РЕМАСТЕРЕ Игра не на грани смерти, но в точке, где следующий шаг определит всё. 💎 РЕМАСТЕР — ЭТО НЕ АПДЕЙТ, А ФУНДАМЕНТ Обещанное - это последний серьёзный шанс исправить то, что годами раздражало: рег, античит, стабильность, модельки которые торчат через стены. Если основа будет крепкой - игра получит второе дыхание. Если сырой - доверие будет подорвано окончательно. ❤️ VALORANT M…

custom 526703676438350997116

16 Jan 2026, 06:28 UTC840 views48 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

🔴РЕШАЕМ ВМЕСТЕ: ЗАПУСКАТЬ ЛИ РУБРИКУ ПРО НАШ CRFACEIT? Ребята, вопрос к вам. Мы в активной разработке, и деталей пока мало. Хотим делать всё прозрачно. Стоит ли нам запустить постоянную рубрику, где мы будем по частям рассказывать и, возможно, показывать, как устроен наш Faceit изнутри? Что это могло бы быть: · Объяснение системы рейтинга и лиг · Как будет работать подбор матчей · Планы по турнирам внутри платформ…

custom 526703676438350997148

12 Jan 2026, 11:29 UTC944 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кратко о возвращении старых команд. Люди говорят, что возвращение старых команд - стагнация. Мы видим обратное. Это "следствие", а не причина. Причина - появление турниров для т2-т3 команд от организаторов вроде CONDR и Apex Tournament. Они создали среду, где командам есть за что играть. Появилась система, карьерный лифт и смысл строить долгосрочный проект. Это не шаг назад - это первый признак того что мы на прав…

custom 526703676438350997112

11 Jan 2026, 08:54 UTC838 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🎬 ИНТЕРАКТИВ ОТ CYBERRANKED! Показал крутой момент со стрима CyberRanked? Теперь он может принести тебе 500 рублей! Условия просты: 1. Записывай свои лучшие моменты (без монтажа). 2. Отправляй их сюда: @CyberRankedSupport 3. Мы выложим твой клип на наш официальный YouTube-канал. Главный приз (500 ₽) получит автор, чей ролик наберет больше всех просмотров к 20 января 2026 года. Можно присылать сколько угодно кл…

custom 52670367643835099719

8 Jan 2026, 08:06 UTC≈1,020 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🛡️ АНОНС: СИСТЕМА ЛИГ В CRFaceit. Команда CyberRanked готовит многоуровневую систему лиг! Что это даст: ✅ Честный подбор соперников по силе ✅ Чёткие цели для роста — от лиги к лиге ✅ Больше мотивации в каждом матче ✅ История вашего прогресса в статистике Система будет тесно связана с сезонами. По итогам каждого - перераспределение и новые возможности. Скоро поделимся деталями. Ждём ваши идеи в комментариях - каким…

custom 526703676438350997114

5 Jan 2026, 17:10 UTC863 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🛡️Нужна ваша помощь❤️ Какую функцию добавить в CRTRANING?

custom 52670367643835099714

5 Jan 2026, 09:49 UTC≈1,050 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏆 ИТОГИ CYBERRANKED DEATHMATCH LEAGUE MAIN : SEASON 1 Поздравляем победителей и финалистов первого сезона! 🥇 1 место: 🤩Lutetius · Общий рейтинг: 1.60 · Приз: 1500₽ 🥈 2 место: 🤩Tickrate · Общий рейтинг: 1.56 · Приз: 1000₽ 🥉3 место: 🤩Krong · Общий рейтинг: 1.52 · Приз: 500₽ Игроки, занявшие 1, 2 и 3 места, также автоматически получают приглашение в следующий сезон турнира. Благодарим всех участников за жаркую бор…

custom 526703676438350997115

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @CyberRanked. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CyberRanked | Standoff 2” (@CyberRanked), 519 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CyberRanked.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.