现在用 Google 搜索缩写 “GPT” 已经不能在首页看到关于 “GUID Partition Table”(GUID 分区表)的结果了。实际上翻了两三页也基本上都是 ChatGPT 的内容。 P.S. 印象中有一张图就是在描述这个现象,“I miss the Internet when searching GPT gives you GUID Partition table”
🥰7❤3🎉1😨1

Channel
@CyanCh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
194subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001166264042 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CyanCh |
| Description | 由于频道主逐渐无法集中精力,无法在该频道中继续发布专业、准确和流畅的内容,该频道即刻停止运营。频道依旧可见,以便索引。感谢大家支持! 频道主的个人频道请见 @old_dudu_channel。 除非另有说明,频道内容按照 CC BY-SA NC 3.0 发布。 |
| Created | 6 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CyanCh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 194 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 194 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 14 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
19 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 7 | 36.8% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 21.1% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2022 to 4 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
现在用 Google 搜索缩写 “GPT” 已经不能在首页看到关于 “GUID Partition Table”(GUID 分区表)的结果了。实际上翻了两三页也基本上都是 ChatGPT 的内容。 P.S. 印象中有一张图就是在描述这个现象,“I miss the Internet when searching GPT gives you GUID Partition table”
🥰7❤3🎉1😨1
https://youtu.be/fuFlMtZmvY0 在你无事可做胡思乱想的时候,去看看外面的世界吧。浏览社交媒体也许可以消磨时间,但是过度依赖社交媒体则可能对人的心理有害。
👍1
第一次参加线下的安同开源社区线下聚会(AOSCC 2023),并且有幸成为演讲者。这次能够参与活动,要感谢各位支持我的社区成员,以及社区外的朋友们。这次活动不管是对 AOSC 社区还是对我来讲,都是很有意义的。 活动举办得很成功,活动内容丰富,尤其是与各大公司的外联环节。本次活动也有业界各位大佬前来参加,比如肥猫。 尽管参与人数远高于我们的预期(预期只有四五十人,结果截止 7 月 13 日人数已经超过 110 人),但是大家都比较遵守会场规定,没有大事发生。 当然,同时作为在活动开始前负责准备及布置会场、活动结束后负责清理会场的人,就我观测到的情况,我也有话要说: · 随地丢垃圾比较严重。第一天活动结束后,我们收拾出一箱垃圾,大部分是塑料瓶。第二天活动结束后,经过巡视,我在大部分座椅后背下搜出一大袋垃圾,依旧是塑料瓶比较多。 · 会场秩序较差。不论是演讲环节还是自由活动环节,都或多或少会出现一些令人不快的情况。总之,即便是要回…
我在 Google 上搜索 TeamSpeak,第一条搜索结果还不指向 teamspeak.com,Google 你怎么回事?
#FFXIV 从周二开始打,每天两小时,已经打完三层零式了! 总的来说进度很快,基本上可以赶上首周队了。由于我们打得比较晚,装备品级会比首周高一些,所以可以减轻一些输出压力。
由于工作和个人原因,一直无法顾及频道内容的更新和维护,频道的更新频率会非常低,频道主刚刚经历过新冠肺炎。 大陆这三年来也经历了无数次封封解解,防疫策略也终于在一个月左右之前彻底改变。但是新冠突然就在大家周围爆发,大家或多或少都出现了新冠肺炎的相关症状。 不论你或者你的家人现在是否正在经历新冠肺炎,本频道还是要提醒大家注意防护和卫生,健康第一,家人正在发烧头痛的时候也要力所能及地照顾他们。 在为大家道新年快乐的同时,也祝大家身体健康,新冠退散。 感谢大家的支持。
现在将这首 《寂静之声》放给大家听。 https://youtu.be/NAEppFUWLfc
经过了几天的折腾、东拼西凑、七改八改,那个灵车板子暂时有主线内核用了。实际上主线内核是可以启动的,只是这个板子上有些树外内核模块,把它改一改,主线上就能跑了~ 我不熟悉 Linux 开发,现在我体验到了折腾的乐趣。也许,未来我就是做这个的。 感谢 Xiaoxi 的耐心帮忙测试、提供 SDK。 #Linux
👍1
如果要从 Telegram 润,你会选择? (不清楚大家最终会不会润,总之照最近的情况看,Telegram 已经开始变质,所以多选几个意味着真正要润的时候多一点选择)
The shares total 187%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
广场遇到的流浪猫
一位频道主对他的手机说他要换新手机了,这是他的手机屏幕发生的变化 永远别在手机面前说换新机的事情,否则旧手机有可能会在你眼前挂掉.jpg
😢3👍1
#是我了 KisKis 蒟蒻 Q 冻,这名字...
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @CyanCh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
如果要从 Telegram 润,你会选择? (不清楚大家最终会不会润,总之照最近的情况看,Telegram 已经开始变质,所以多选几个意味着真正要润的时候多一点选择)
The shares total 187%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2022 to 4 December 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,019,651 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CyanChannel Archive” (@CyanCh), 194 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CyanCh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.