Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Cumbria Freedom Fighters

@CumbriaFreedomFighters

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

27subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002370090649
TypeChannel
Username@CumbriaFreedomFighters
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CumbriaFreedomFighters

Growth

262726.57 August 2026 — 26 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:3527+1
11 Aug 2026, 08:3126no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:3526first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
225.9%
avg views ÷ 27 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.0
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held15 (21 June 202610 August 2026)
Views total488
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯375.0%
👍125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC3 viewsread 11 August 2026

Anyone seen this? Seems to be a national fear driven propaganda exercise to make people believe in the Climate Crisis Narrative.👇 https://www.nebriefing.org https://www.nebriefing.org/aims "The Government should launch a science-led national emergency response to climate and nature breakdown showing the same leadership and determination as in WW2 and during the financial crisis. This should include emergency legi

4 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC15 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @morecamberesistPhoto

👆Corruption in Local Planning - Something is a little old, not falling down, but in use; could be leisure, shops, something liked or beneficial. - Measures to improve its offer are knocked back by the local authority. - Then suddenly a big developer, or corporation, comes along and proposes demolition, & building something no one asked for, as the solution. It's then claimed that because the new development is pr

31 Jul 2026, 17:19 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @exp0singth8c0rrupt

The Illusion of Democracy: Local Government Reorganisation Exposed https://docmalik.substack.com/p/499-madeleine-hunt-and-rachel-mathews Manufactured Crises: How Councils Use Fake Emergencies to Seize Control and What You Can Do About It.

27 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @RedPill_HealthPhoto

👆Individual who wanted workers to be jabbed whether they wanted it or not. He effectively didn't give them a say in the matter, treating them as if they had no minds of their own. And likely no jobs to go back to if they refused. Is this the way he treats people in general??? 🤨😠

25 Jul 2026, 22:58 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

The Mission Creep - Things start off small, or "for your safety." - Then they start to expand into other areas bit by bit. - Before you know it, you have a complete system controlling or expanding into everything. Can you spot this type of thing in your towns, cities or even in daily life??

💯2

25 Jul 2026, 22:02 UTC386 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Allonby Bay, between Maryport and Silloth, was designated as one of England's first three Highly Protected Marine Areas in 2023. 👆Did anyone local actually agree to this? The designation is intended to allow the recovery of the whole marine ecosystem, rather than only selected species or habitats, protecting everything from the shore and seabed to the water column and sea surface. The bay contains 'blue carbon' ha

19 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC18 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @freedomnetworkworldwidePhoto

👆British Man likes to set example to his daughter by standing shoulder to shoulder with BLM...

15 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC22 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

👆For YOUR Safety 🤨 You might see these notices appearing on the new look Stagecoach buses. CCTV For Your Safety They have to tell you it's for your benefit (e.g. saying it's to keep you safe); so people don't raise too many objections if they believe it's for their protection. ___ https://www.stagecoachbus.com/news/merseyside-and-south-lancashire/2025/april/stagecoach-rolls-out-new-look-buses-across-its-network

12 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @morecamberesistPhoto

👆Fear based addiction?👇 - "Where's my phone? Where's my PHONE!!!" - "You should keep your phone with you at all times in case of an emergency! What happens if you have an accident & you can't contact us!!?!!" - "I have to use it to keep in touch with people." - "If you don't have your phone you won't know what's going on in the world..." How often have we heard this?👆 How did we manage to go from a mobile (cordles

💯1

9 Jul 2026, 04:14 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @UK_ResistancePhoto

👆A good way for them to protect Agenda 21 & any similar agendas. Pretty much ensuring no one is able to have any say on these matters at a local level.

29 Jun 2026, 18:20 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @morecamberesistPhoto

Taking a Few Steps Back You know, I had the strangest feeling a few weeks back. Like to go back to using the materials we used to use instead of plastics. Had a similar feeling pre-plandemic, only that was not to take any more flu vaccines. But recently, I was looking at some terracotta pots and just this feeling came though like "yes, perhaps should give terracotta plant pots a go again rather than plastics." Sa

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @CumbriaFreedomFighters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cumbria Freedom Fighters” (@CumbriaFreedomFighters), 27 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CumbriaFreedomFighters.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.