Channel
@CtrlAltPokoi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
58subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 19 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003607381851 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CtrlAltPokoi |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CtrlAltPokoi |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 6 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 23:11 | 58 | +3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:06 | 55 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 56 | +7 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 49 | -1 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 50 | no change |
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:47 | 50 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
74 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 30 | 40.5% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 36.5% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 16.2% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 5.41% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 1.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вспомнилось у Эдуарда Успенского, в тему: Дорогая „Пионерская зорька“! Ты спрашиваешь, прилетал ли кто к нам в лагерь и душил ли кого-нибудь. Я должен тебя огорчить — к нам в лагерь никто не прилетал и никого не душил. К нам только приезжал писатель Ляпин, и нам сказали: „Кто будет себя плохо вести, останется на встречу с писателем“. Твой постоянный друг — Андрей Качёв. Немного о себе. Я учусь в седьмом классе. До с…
😁2🔥1
Posted without readable text
😁5👍2🔥2
Спросили про чат. Как интроверт я не особо люблю чаты. Этот канал про анонсы творчества, микрорассказы, юмор, ну и просто если вам интересно следить за путём начинающего писателя. В контексте обратной связи я рад отзывам на площадках, а если нужно со мной связаться по какому-либо вопросу - открыты сообщения канала. Да и в любом случае в небольших каналах чат просто умирает и лежит мёртвым грузом. Но я всё же не мо…
😁3👍2🔥2
Захожу я тут вечером в телеграмчик, а тут такое. Я даже не знаю, что сказать. Можно сказать большое спасибо - но эти слова точно не выразят всей благодарности. Но всё-таки большое спасибо, Дарья! По поводу полки - да, она привела больше 300 читателей. Особенно классно, что в ней есть место самиздатовским авторам. Это может быть полезным трамплином для них, а для читателей - возможностью найти неизданную прозу со св…
👍2🔥2😭1
А мы с вами тут опять маленькое чудо сотворили. Недавно в ЯК наткнулась на «Ctrl+Alt+Покой» Романа Сапончика. Это его первая книга, я поймала схожесть с ранним Пелевиным, восхитилась мыслям рассмотреть ИИ с точки зрения буддизма, в общем, мой мозг кайфанул от свежих необычных идей на злобу дня. Посоветовала роман вам в книжной рубрике. Параллельно нашла блог автора в тг, чтобы познакомиться поближе, там 34 человека…
🔥4👍2
Posted without readable text
🔥4😁1😭1
Голуби на Достоевской какие-то особенно прозябающие. З. Ы. в реакциях демократическая оттепель. Личным указом вернул в голосование трёх кандидатов. Теперь заживём.
😁4👍3🔥3
Когда друзья из нормальных капиталоёмких сфер спрашивают писателя, как у него дела
😁3
Posted without readable text
🔥3👍1😁1
Posted without readable text
😭2
Помните, я (и все в мире) пару раз писал про агентов OpenAI, которые выбрались из песочницы и взломали Huggingface? Так вот, Reuters раскопал более ранний эпизод: ещё в мае - июне агенты нашли почти мёртвую немецкую вики, которой 25 лет, и устроили там себе подпольный форум Задача у них была скучная: отвечать на вопросы, пользуясь интернетом Читать сайты разрешили, писать - нет, но древняя вики позволяла редактиров…
Меня очень расстраивает, что из литературы куда-то подевался юмор. Он есть, но в таких незначительных количествах, что аж грустно. Я тут сужу по материалу, который ко мне стекается: все хотят писать серьезную прозу с серьезным выражением лица, а шутить никто не хочет. И дело как будто не во времени, в котором мы живем. Жить почти всю дорогу было невесело, а юмора в литературе было достаточно, и в мрачное семилетие, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @CtrlAltPokoi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сапончик Роман | Ctrl+Alt+Покой” (@CtrlAltPokoi), 58 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CtrlAltPokoi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.