Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CS Ducks _Move Gambles Call

Channel

CS Ducks _Move Gambles Call

@CsDucks_MoveCall

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,037subscribers

-412 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001729018335
TypeChannel
Username@CsDucks_MoveCall
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CsDucks_MoveCall

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,0372,4492,2437 August 2026 — 2,449 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,449 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,447 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,438 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,433 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,423 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,420 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,413 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,407 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,398 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,392 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,382 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,221 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,037 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -412. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,975–2,511 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 10:402,037-184
14 Sept 2026, 09:002,221-161
10 Sept 2026, 14:362,382-10
5 Sept 2026, 03:012,392-6
1 Sept 2026, 12:362,398-9
29 Aug 2026, 18:552,407-6
26 Aug 2026, 13:342,413-7
23 Aug 2026, 08:242,420-3
19 Aug 2026, 16:562,423-10
16 Aug 2026, 20:482,433-5
13 Aug 2026, 17:562,438-9
10 Aug 2026, 19:122,447-2
7 Aug 2026, 10:312,449no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:232,449first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1940.4%
🥰1123.4%
👍714.9%
🔥48.51%
🙏36.38%
👏24.26%
❤‍🔥12.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC256 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

This picture made me realize that meme coins on Solana might be back. A great opportunity for those who know how to seize it before the devs start farming hard and rug the pool. Lollll moonrush.space/r/duck

🥰2❤1🔥1

4 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC181 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Wtf 1k5 - 215K on Moonrush $manlet holyshit moonrush.space/r/duck

🔥2👏1🥰1

2 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC157 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Holy shitt $manlet Can copy trade And check signal on moonrush.space/r/duck

🥰3❤1

9 Jun 2026, 13:13 UTC200 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

My portfolio on Moonrush_space Can trade with me Ref code: ducks

👍3❤1🔥1

7 Jun 2026, 16:32 UTC161 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

NO!!! @moonrush_space flagged it as a rug risk. I decided to ape in anyway. Sometimes you know it's a gamble, but you still want to test your luck. (FUCK $GITMAPS) Closed position: loss $47

👍2

7 Jun 2026, 14:51 UTC129 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

New position opened. $GITMAPS now trend launch @MeteoraAG Risking 2% of portfolio.( always Dyor) publicly on @moonrush_space

❤3👍1🥰1

3 Jun 2026, 17:20 UTC141 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

oh my god Can't even look at my account anymore... Time to start building again. A new cycle begins. Follow me on X: CSDucks (@CSDucks) / X

🙏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @CsDucks_MoveCall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Maskandi hits 2026❤️💙🔥
@Maskandi20 · 23,585
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CS Ducks _Move Gambles Call” (@CsDucks_MoveCall), 2,037 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CsDucks_MoveCall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.