Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CryptoLaunchList SCAM ALERTS❗

@Cryptolaunchlist_ScamAlert

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

233subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001187456289
TypeChannel
Username@Cryptolaunchlist_ScamAlert
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Cryptolaunchlist_ScamAlert

Growth

233234233.57 August 2026 — 234 subscribers7 August 2026 — 234 subscribers13 August 2026 — 233 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 233–234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:36233-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:47234no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:22234first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 October 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

24 Jan 2022, 22:16 UTC996 viewsread 7 August 2026

MetaRealmOnline is a scam, do not invest they are known scammers

18 Nov 2021, 18:33 UTC≈2,620 viewsread 7 August 2026

| Cvla @Zaracer | Typed: am from Twitty protocol, Glass Oracle and today its Meta Deer are scamming people everyday, they put same liquidity,just changing names on telegram and making fairlaunch everyday MetaDeer is a scam

17 Nov 2021, 14:18 UTC≈2,240 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Which Fair Launch project isn't a scam in your opinion on today's fair launch? [DYOR BEFORE VOTING]

  1. 15:30UTC @InuKitsune4%
  2. 17:00UTC @BabyGirl2token5%
  3. 18:00UTC @apacer_cloud1%
  4. 19:00UTC @glass_oracle5%
  5. 19:30UTC @bitdoge_bsc4%
  6. TBA @BelfastToken4%
  7. [ All are scams. ]46%
  8. Neutral - Vote here if you don't know to view total vote42%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Nov 2021, 17:45 UTC≈2,240 viewsread 7 August 2026

| HomojenikAyran @ComplexSlacker | Typed: little raca scam is a coin

9 Nov 2021, 13:27 UTC≈2,190 viewsread 7 August 2026

| Faramir (Alexander) @FaramirAlexander | Typed: https://t.me/LittleRaca Again its the fake italian! scamming everyday 2 months now.

8 Nov 2021, 21:08 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 7 August 2026

| reporter: Magic toast @magictoast0 | Typed: 18:00 UTC https://t.me/FlokinomiX 8th November. Fake rebase token, banning for asking questions in chat. I paid 0.27bnb for 240b tokens at 400k mc I got rebased to 32B. My 32b is worth 0.1BNB at 400k mc

8 Nov 2021, 14:17 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Which Fair launch project isn't a scam in your opinion on today's fair launch?

  1. PsyduckInu6%
  2. MorphieSwap5%
  3. NakamaCoin2%
  4. Shibaversebsc6%
  5. destro_system1%
  6. marspot3%
  7. [ All are scams. ]40%
  8. Neutral - Vote here if you're neutral to view total votes37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Nov 2021, 16:43 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 7 August 2026

| Moonbags Only - Connor @moonbagsgalore | Typed: BlkUSD Honeypot - Sets a very high approval fee This honeypot variant whitelists sellers who are able to approve, and hikes the approval fee for anyone else, making it nearly impossible to sell tokens. _allowances[address(this)][address(router)] = _totalSupply

5 Nov 2021, 20:34 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 7 August 2026

| AK @memebasket | Typed: @DuneGameBSC Is going to have a presale in two days. However, many alarm bells. All the Twitter Profiles of the Team were made in the same day. 1st November this year. Very little information regarding the "game" and heavily botted TG. Little to no interaction by the Devs and there is a Proxy Function in the Contract according to a user https://gyazo.com/e994cfc295215d7d6811acb02293206a STAY

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Cryptolaunchlist_ScamAlert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Nov 2021, 14:18 UTCAnonymous Poll149 voters

Which Fair Launch project isn't a scam in your opinion on today's fair launch? [DYOR BEFORE VOTING]

  1. 15:30UTC @InuKitsune4%
  2. 17:00UTC @BabyGirl2token5%
  3. 18:00UTC @apacer_cloud1%
  4. 19:00UTC @glass_oracle5%
  5. 19:30UTC @bitdoge_bsc4%
  6. TBA @BelfastToken4%
  7. [ All are scams. ]46%
  8. Neutral - Vote here if you don't know to view total vote42%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8 Nov 2021, 14:17 UTCAnonymous Poll191 voters

Which Fair launch project isn't a scam in your opinion on today's fair launch?

  1. PsyduckInu6%
  2. MorphieSwap5%
  3. NakamaCoin2%
  4. Shibaversebsc6%
  5. destro_system1%
  6. marspot3%
  7. [ All are scams. ]40%
  8. Neutral - Vote here if you're neutral to view total votes37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2021 to 24 January 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,071,131 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CryptoLaunchList SCAM ALERTS❗” (@Cryptolaunchlist_ScamAlert), 233 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cryptolaunchlist_ScamAlert.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.