Crypto Club Calls pinned «TRON 链上 3.44 亿 USDT 遭 OFAC 冻结,再次提醒市场:稳定币不是完全独立于现实金融体系之外。 监管规则会影响链上资金流动。 洞察报告来源: 全球网络安全联盟 https://www.gcsa.org»

Channel
Crypto Club Calls
@CryptoclubCalls1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
178subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002105570452 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoclubCalls1 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoclubCalls1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 178 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 178 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 196
- Videos
- 19
- Links
- 214
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 25s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
611 reactions across 7 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🌚 | 168 | 27.5% | |
| 👍 | 84 | 13.7% | |
| 🍌 | 66 | 10.8% | |
| 😈 | 41 | 6.71% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 6.38% | |
| 🥱 | 31 | 5.07% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 3.93% | |
| 💔 | 22 | 3.60% | |
| 👌 | 20 | 3.27% | |
| 🌭 | 18 | 2.95% | |
| 🎉 | 18 | 2.95% | |
| 🐳 | 16 | 2.62% | |
| 🍓 | 15 | 2.45% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 2.45% | |
| 🥴 | 8 | 1.31% | |
| 🤨 | 6 | 0.982% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 0.818% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.491% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.491% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.491% | |
| 3 further kinds | 6 | 0.982% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 611reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2025 to 26 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
TRON 链上 3.44 亿 USDT 遭 OFAC 冻结,再次提醒市场:稳定币不是完全独立于现实金融体系之外。 监管规则会影响链上资金流动。 洞察报告来源: 全球网络安全联盟 https://www.gcsa.org
Crypto Club Calls pinned a photo
AB Anywhere: Why List on Binance Alpha? On June 7, 2025, AB DAO announced that its native token $AB officially began trading on Binance Alpha—Binance’s early-access, exclusive listing platform. What strategic considerations led AB to choose Alpha, and what role does this phase play in the “AB Anywhere” cross-chain asset vision? This report delves into the AB team’s rationale and plans. (Details: See the official Bi…
⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️Inflationary Pressure Soars, US-China Trade Tensions Reignite? VCBot becomes a safe haven for your capital!⚡️ 📉 The recent Trump tariff policy has resurfaced, and global markets are shaken. 📈 The U.S. dollar's purchasing power is declining, asset preservation is urgent 🌍 More and more people are turning to emerging markets like Hong Kong and crypto investments. 📶 Start Trading with Quantitative Robotics fr…
👍58👌20🐳16🔥11❤🔥5💯3❤1
Crypto Club Calls pinned a photo
AB 慈善基金会 X AB 公链携手推动“科技向善”的全球使命 AB 慈善基金会(AB Foundation X AB 公链)今日宣布,新增 10 位具有国际影响力的政要与全球事务专家正式加入基金会高级顾问委员会,进一步壮大其全球战略智库,支持 AB 基金会 X AB 公链在技术赋能公益领域的拓展与全球合作。 他们的加入,意味着 AB 慈善基金会的顾问网络已涵盖五大洲近三十位前任和现任政要、国际组织领袖与政策专家,组成一个跨文化、跨领域、跨制度的“全球公益战略引擎”。 基金会主席、爱尔兰前总理伯蒂·埃亨(Bertie Ahern)表示:“我们欢迎这些极具远见与行动力的顾问加入 AB。科技向善是一场全球性合作的事业,唯有结合治理经验与技术创新,才能打造可信、普惠、可持续的全球公益体系。” AB 慈善基金会将继续扩展其治理网络,并与联合国系统、国际 NGO、政府机构与前沿科技企业开展多方协作,在教育、医疗、环境保护与人道救援…
Crypto Club Calls pinned a video
🎮 Tired of GameFi projects with no soul? Meet Moon Tropica: a high intensity, meme-fueled, Web3 battle royale made for competitive players and crypto junkies. It’s been over 3 years in the making, with $CAH already trading for 2.5 years. No hype cycles, no overnight rug pulls. It's real gameplay, real communities, and real rewards. What to expect: ✅ Full crypto integration without ruining the fun ✅ Staking for skin…
👍24🔥24❤21🎉17😁15
Crypto Club Calls pinned a photo
【AB 慈善基金会携手 AB 公链引领科技向善:铸造公信力,技术赋能公益】 爱尔兰·都柏林 – 2025 年 5 月 8 日 – AB 慈善基金会与 AB 公链在都柏林成功举办了AB第一届“技术驱动世界公益闭门论坛”。 本次论坛汇聚了来自全球各地的杰出领袖,包括爱尔兰前总理、欧盟委员会前主席 伯蒂·埃亨阁下 (Bertie Ahern),尼日利亚前总统、非盟前主席 奥卢塞贡·奥巴桑乔阁下 (Olusegun Obasanjo),爱尔兰现任国会议员、人工智能委员会主席马尔科姆·伯恩先生 (Malcolm Byrne),以及其他政要和著名学者,他们齐聚一堂,共同探讨区块链、人工智能等尖端科技在全球公益事业。 【会议视频中文版链接:https://youtu.be/2Pg5El3pY3E】 论坛由 AB 慈善基金会主席、爱尔兰前总理、欧盟委员会前主席伯蒂·埃亨(Bertie Ahern)主持并发表主旨演讲,题为《技术与信任:构…
Crypto Club Calls pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoclubCalls1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,331,086 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Club Calls” (@CryptoclubCalls1), 178 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoclubCalls1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.