Channel
@Crypto_weekdays_PUB
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
191subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001919611013 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Crypto_weekdays_PUB |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Crypto_weekdays_PUB |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 191 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 192 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 192 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
197 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 136 | 69.0% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 10.7% | |
| ⚡ | 20 | 10.2% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 9.64% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.508% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2025 to 15 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Crypto_weekdays_PUB. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 November 2025 to 15 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
VIRTUALS #AI #SPECULATION Сегодня мы увидели первую долю внимания. Хороший знак по $DRUCK. Подробнее объяснил в посте. $FAT начал с успешных сделок. Я хочу увидеть развязку и основные пампы до вторника включительно. Там ожидаются байбеки и сжигание. Сейчас основные триггеры роста это плюсовой трейдинг, который даст байбек+сжигание, общий хайп, потенциальный крайм и открытие офи…
👍5❤1
Signed Noxxxwill
#VIRTUALS #AI #SPECULATION Первый сезон торгового соревнования завершился. Крутили-вертели и решили: 1️⃣ USDC за подписки вернуть на кошельки без клейма. 2️⃣ кто подписался до первого дедлайна (без продления после поста) и угадал с TaXerClaw, Otto AI, Degenerate trader, Ethy AI, DegenX - получили приятные бонусы. 3️⃣ подписки убрать, правила изменить. Новые правила тут. Коротко п…
👍6
Signed Noxxxwill
#VIRTUALS #AI #SPECULATION Виртуалс запустили и спонсируют торговые соревнования AI-агентов. Условия и подробности здесь. 🟢По сути механики: 🔳 любой желающий может запустить своего агента, активировать торговый скилл и присоединиться; ◽️ одинаковые условия для всех: торговля осуществляется на Hyperliquid через специального агента DG (одинаковые условия по месту и исполнению, но разные по то…
👍4❤2
Signed Noxxxwill
#SPECULATION #MEME #AI $AGENT - x3 dexscreener.com/base/0xebe171fcaa290227f3e466d637bab9e8f3c472b3a013fb2315c5c9a222feb65a Быстрее, чем я ожидал. Это всегда приятно. Фиксируйте профит агрессивно. Если кажется, что это может и должно стоить дороже - оставьте мунбег на проверку. Не время искать технологии, время спекулировать. UPD: x7 и тут уже начинается самая обычная жадность...
👍6🔥2
Signed Noxxxwill
#SPECULATION #MEME #AI $AGENT - 58k mcap dexscreener.com/base/0xebe171fcaa290227f3e466d637bab9e8f3c472b3a013fb2315c5c9a222feb65a Хорошо откатился, фаза 3 запущена, дев билдит, бот притих. Предполагаю, под новый анонс могут легко переоценить на пару-тройку иксов. Взял под флип, как легит проект на гембл-сайз.
👍3🔥3❤1
Signed Noxxxwill
#SPECULATION #MEME $ROSIE - 600k mcap dexscreener.com/solana/2poighb9cbavdzkm488ntbbdw2keuqe9twhzged574qv Подробно об истории человека и собаки - здесь (много букв). Коротко по сути: огромное желание помочь своему питомцу, стимулировало задействовать AI технологии (ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini) в поиске решения проблемы. Произошло полное погружение в тематику и разработана вакцина с помощью AI, котора…
👍8
Signed Noxxxwill
#UPD #SPECULATION Дев заклеймил комиссию, фактически признал токен и имеет планы на него. x.com/Tuteth_/status/2036455217143697422 Сегодня нужно найти точку выхода и зафиксить профит, чтобы спокойно ожидать фазу 3 и ютилити токена. Фактически основной тригер роста сработал. Осталось оплатить DEX, вписать CA в bio агента, может, на сайт добавить. Не вижу причин холдить.
👍6😁1
Signed Noxxxwill
#AI #AIAGENTS #SPECULATION UPD: перелил $MEI по 110к в $AGNT по 50к. Почему? Логика следующая: по MEI основные данные открыты, точнее сказать уже отыграли. Теперь надежда на что-то новое (какие-то партнерства, коллабы или что-то в этом роде). Рынок снова вниз, а значит +риск отката/укатки. AGNT, напротив, не отыграл основные триггеры: конфирм токена, клейм фисов, закрепление CA в био агента. …
👍8❤1
Signed Noxxxwill
#AI #AIAGENTS #SPECULATION Уже несколько дней наблюдаю за двумя проектами и созрел поделиться ими. Это мелкокапы, помним о рисках и соблюдаем РМ. 1️⃣$AGNT - 72k mcap dexscreener.com/base/0xebe171fcaa290227f3e466d637bab9e8f3c472b3a013fb2315c5c9a222feb65a Агент - x.com/AGNTSOCIAL Дев - x.com/Tuteth_ Запуск через BNKR от комьюнити. Комиссионные на проект. 🟢Дев крипто нативен, в…
👍10🔥2❤1
Signed Noxxxwill
#AI #ANTHROPIC #CLAUDE #OPENAI USA VS ANTHROPIC Anthropic - американская компания, разрабатывающая LLM - Claude и AI-системы. Конкуренты: OpenAI (ChatGPT), Google/DeepMind (Gemini), Meta, Mistral, хАI (Grok), Deep-Seek. 🔳Что произошло? Трамп, в присушем ему гневном стиле, раскритиковал Anthropic, назвав его угрозой для национальной безопасности и что они совершили катастрофическую ошибку. …
👍5❤2
Signed Noxxxwill
#X #TWITTER Paid Partnerships политика Х: мифы и реальность. Данный вопрос вызвал большой ажиотаж. Где-то люди фантазировали: где-то были правы, где-то ошибались. Никита Биер анонсировал запуск Paid Partnership, все детали которого официально закреплены здесь. 🔴Paid Partnerships ≠ реклама. Это разные категории с разными правилами. 🔴X определяет "платные партнёрства" как участие бренд…
👍6
#AI #AIAGENTS #CLAW Давайте попробуем по пути наименьшего сопротивления: направление и тикеры. Важно понимать, что мои твх могут существенно отличатся от тех, которые вы увидите. Не влетайте на зелёных палках, чтобы не стать экзитликвой. Рынок сложный, жёсткий PvP, мало ликвидности. Набирайте/закрывайте позиции частями. Снизьте ожидания. Агрессивнее фиксируйте профит. Первая волн…
👍8🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Crypto_weekdays_PUB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,196,262 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Криптобудни” (@Crypto_weekdays_PUB), 191 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_weekdays_PUB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.