تحديث #btc #A 🔥 تم كسر 95292 .ونحن نتجه للسلبية 🔴 كسر الترند الصاعد + الاساس 93500 يؤكد سلبية القادم ☠️ لكن لا تنسو الاغلاق حينها .لمن سيتابع وقت الكسر تذكرو ملامسة 92 بذيل امر طبيعي في حال حدثت 👍 ايجابيتنا تعود عند ارتدادنا من اي نقطة من النقاط التي سبق ذكرها بالاعلى 🤬

Channel
CRYPTO LIONS
@Crypto_Lionsss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
154subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001254677381 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Crypto_Lionsss |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Crypto_Lionsss |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 154 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 154 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
841 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 832 | 98.9% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 0.357% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.238% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 0.119% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.119% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.119% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.119% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 841reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2022 to 24 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
عدنا والعود احمد #btc #A 🔥🔥🔥 مابين الايجابية والسلبية 95292 اتجاه للايجابية 98555 اتجاه للسلبية . 93500 وفي الغالب سيتخبط بين الاثنتين وعلينا الانتظار حتى يضيق الترند الصاعد والنازل اكثر ليتضح الاتجاه . ترقبو التحديثات القادمة 🔥
🔴 من داخل البيت الأبيض: إعلان تاريخي يهز عالم الذكاء الاصطناعي! 🚨 في مؤتمر صحفي استثنائي داخل البيت الأبيض، وبحضور الرئيس الأمريكي، أعلنت OpenAI بالتعاون مع SoftBank عن مشروعها العملاق "The Stargate Project"، الذي يُعد الأكبر في تاريخ الذكاء الاصطناعي! 🔝 💰 الاستثمارات: سيتم ضخ 500 مليار دولار خلال 4 سنوات لبناء بنية تحتية متطورة تعزز ريادة الولايات المتحدة في هذا المجال. وتم البدء بالدفعة الأولى بقيمة 100 مليار دول…
CRYPTO LIONS pinned Deleted message
تقاضي FTX بينانس وCZ مقابل 1.7 مليار دولار، وتدعي FTX أن Binance وCZ تسببتا في انهيارها عن طريق التخلص من رموز FTT، مما تسبب في أزمة سيولة. ☠️ FTX sues Binance and CZ for $1.7B FTX claims Binance and CZ triggered its collapse by dumping FTT tokens, causing a liquidity crisis.
🔥1
• تم صنع رابط هدية بقيمة 80 نقطة • الرابط : https://t.me/srwry2bot?start=to20e1a65760e86c85b5ffa429e3f78c47518559 • الرابط صالح لمده 30 ساعة • يمكن ل 400 عضو الدخول الى الرابط
⚡️ Bitcoin overtakes gold 🔥🔥 ⚠️ BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF has surpassed its Gold ETF in net assets, hitting $33.2B in just 10 months ✔️
Photo, posted without a caption
😁2❤1🎉1👍1
The sale of bitcoin on Binance continues. The US market is buying but the selling pressure is stronger. The price drop caused a huge liquidation of Long deals, and the volume of open interest fell by 1.5 billion dollars. The 58K level is currently the strongest support, the one from which the price rebounded after the fall. This level must be maintained.
👍669
Bitcoin demand growth remains at low levels and even has turned negative in the last few weeks. Bitcoin Apparent demand has slowed considerably since early April when Bitcoin was trading at around $70K.
👍2🔥2
Bitcoin OTC Desk Balances Soar to Two-Year Peak “Historically, increases in Bitcoin OTC desk balances have been associated with declines in Bitcoin prices.” – Link
👍28🥰1
Stablecoins’ total market cap has hit a record $165 billion, the highest ever. This increase often signals rising Bitcoin and crypto prices.
👍117
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Crypto_Lionsss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 613,368 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Crypto_Lionsss named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO LIONS” (@Crypto_Lionsss), 154 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_Lionsss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.