Channel
@CryptoStash
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
644subscribers
-305 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001422479445 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoStash |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoStash |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:29 | 644 | -177 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 821 | -114 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 935 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 949 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 949 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
128 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 27 | 21.1% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 20.3% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 20.3% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 19.5% | |
| 🎉 | 22 | 17.2% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2025 to 16 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We’ve seen this cycle repeat a thousand times. The majority waits for the noise to get loud before asking: "Is it too late?" By then, the advantage is gone. Right now, Bullshot 911 is in the "Quiet Accumulation" phase. No hype, no screaming—just smart players stacking points daily. The Blueprint: 🔹 Early Activity: Historically, this is where the multipliers are hidden. 🔹 The Grind: Creating tokens, engaging, and invi…
🔥1
Bullshot: More Than Just a Launchpad Bullshot is shifting the meta by rewarding the most valuable asset in crypto: Activity. Whether you're a dev or a community member, every move you make earns you points. 🔄 The Ecosystem: 1️⃣ Create: Launch your vision with ease. 2️⃣ Engage: Be part of the conversation. 3️⃣ Earn: Accumulate points for every interaction. 🌟 Why join today? Unlimited Upside: No caps on point accumulat…
Meme tokens are everywhere right now… but launching one used to be complicated af. Not anymore 👇 Bullshot makes it stupid simple. AI-powered launchpad on BNB Chain — create your own token in seconds. No coding. No stress. How it works: • Go to bullshot.io • Connect wallet • Set name, supply & tax (1–10%) • Click launch 🚀 That’s it. Combines AI + meme culture + BNB speed → perfect for building real community tokens. S…
👩💻 #REVIEW BITCOIN Now that early flush is in fact super bullish! $BTC had no strength to pump straight from $65k support, so we saw a quick dump to punish longs and trap late shorts! Now the pivotal point is monthly VAL at $65500 level. If $BTC is bullish, it should act like a support and provide a great long opportunity with targets at monthly VWAP and VAH! If $65500 level is lost though, things may get really …
👍2
👩💻 #REVIEW BITCOIN For the first time in days I think we're about to have a nice bounce! $BTC ripped hard, almost tagging $80k mark. Now it's crucial for bulls to break $88k resistance! If they manage to do so, next big level is $94k. If $88k level is too strong and bears hold it, prepare for any possible and impossible price levels! Remember: every bear market $BTC dumps lower than you think it can!
👍1
ETH 4H
👍1
🚀 $DEFI is About to Explode! De.Fi is already backed by Binance, Coinbase, OKX, ConsenSys (MetaMask) & 21Shares – the first Bitcoin ETF issuer! 🏦 On top of that, Donald Trump Jr has publicly supported De.Fi and even follows them on Twitter! 🇺🇸🔥 But that’s not all… 👉 De.Fi just announced a Huge Partnership with an American Institution and I believe this will be the start of a massive $DEFI price run. 💡 With Trump f…
😁16🎉11🔥10❤9👍9
$MAZE is better than every single competitor on the market $TON = $17B MC $MAZE = $500K MC Once maze chat rolls out its privacy app on iPhone, this instantly turns into one of the best risk-reward plays in all of crypto
🔥2
🚀 ETH ALT SZN IS HERE 🚀 We’re expecting a big breakout for $MAZE in the coming hours 📈 The chart has bottomed on a 1M floor, setting the stage for a strong upward move. ✅ 700 holders in just 36 hours ✅ 100% community-driven - no snipers, no insiders ✅ Delivering the app & tech crypto has been waiting for over 5 years ✅ Built to onboard millions of users in the next few years If you missed the ETH on chain run in 2…
❤16👍13🎉11🔥11😁11
In-Built Web3 Wallet , Inside Maze 1️⃣ Non-custodial, you own the keys, always. 2️⃣ Send & receive crypto instantly. 3️⃣ Send crypto directly to your contacts. 4️⃣ Trade tokens without leaving the app. 5️⃣ Token mixer coming to Maze Windows for extra privacy. Result: Messaging, payments, and trading, all in one secure, private platform. https://x.com/maze_chat/status/1955313005652017303?t=jIx_pqE5MH_Iy47WfYHM1A&s=…
😱2
https://twitter.com/WatcherGuru/status/1950533825638887640?s=19
Hyperliquid hit a $16B mcap. Early $HYPE buyers made x5 since TGE. Now I found a Hyperliquid competitor - backed by Trump - at just $5M mcap. 100x+ potential. Killer risk/reward. It’s $DEFI. Launching their own perp DEX soon.......
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoStash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,203,445 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO STASH” (@CryptoStash), 644 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoStash.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.