Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 57 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 980–998 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Oct 2026, 11:58
982
-2
19 Sept 2026, 12:39
984
-4
10 Sept 2026, 18:36
988
-1
1 Sept 2026, 05:55
989
-2
24 Aug 2026, 09:28
991
-4
16 Aug 2026, 18:47
995
-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:35
996
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:41
996
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
145 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
94
64.8%
❤
39
26.9%
🔥
6
4.14%
🥰
2
1.38%
👏
1
0.69%
😁
1
0.69%
😢
1
0.69%
🤡
1
0.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2023 to 21 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.tradingview.com/x/g4Sk5elJ/
「這球你敢打嗎？」
BTC重返66K，距離ATH僅僅一步之遙﹔12H收高後我認為是突破了，卻不見散戶搖旗高喊to da moon？這個情緒是很詭異的，在車上的人既貪婪著妄想ATH又同時漲到自己都害怕，不在車上的人拒絕接受現實，等待回調卻一路踏空。
也許大家都聽過韭菜的失敗來自於追漲殺跌，然而追強與盲目追漲是不一樣的，回歸到線圖來看，突破了就是突破了，為何要怕？止損掛好即可。到現在除了沒有感受到散戶的狂歡，甚至感受到空軍還在蠢蠢欲動；追漲殺跌可能是錯的，然而逆勢猜頂更是需要天時地利人和；現在寧願踏空去找別的機會，也不要輕易加入空軍，上一輪返回兩萬的時候大概也是這氛圍吧！不可否認風險常常隨著價格越漲越高，但是當市場還在懷疑，那麼我想還不是時候。
單純記錄一下自己的想法，不敢說我一定對，但錯了不過就是吃筍，也沒什麼大不了，Let's do it.
…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoReno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Reno's Trading Notes” (@CryptoReno), 982 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoReno.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
