Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CryptoKotletaChannel

@CryptoKotletaChannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

173subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001160963177
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoKotletaChannel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoKotletaChannel

Growth

1731771756 August 2026 — 177 subscribers8 August 2026 — 177 subscribers12 August 2026 — 173 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 172–178 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:07173-4
8 Aug 2026, 13:31177no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:04177first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.7%
avg views ÷ 173 subscribers
Avg views / post
102
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 April 202628 July 2026)
Views total406
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

79 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1620.3%
🔥1620.3%
😁1519.0%
👏78.86%
👀56.33%
45.06%
33.80%
💯33.80%
🍓22.53%
😢22.53%
😱22.53%
🙈22.53%
11.27%
🤝11.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 18:12 UTC141 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🩻 Восстание крипты, начало... С биржи WhiteBit невозможно перечислить USDT на кошелек @xRocket 🚀

👀1🙈1

19 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC113 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не прошло и полдня. Я не покладал рук и искал те кошели, транзы и активности которые делал в WB-тестнете. Короче как-то так вышло что я 3 кошеля смазал с одним аккаунтом биржи, поэтому дропецкий ранее я уже вытянул. Но удалось найти еще один кош, на котором аж полтора токена удалось заклеймить. Приятно что контракт дропа не закрыли спустя 3 года. Обычно крипто-конторы дают время на клейм, потом либо сжигают, либо

👍6👏2🔥2

19 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC83 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В 2023 активно крутил ретро, старался участвовать в платных и бесплатных викторинах, выполнял тестнеты, сжигал комиссии, крутил объемы. Да думаю многие из читателей либо слышали, либо принимали участие в этом. Наткнулся на интервью Владимира Носова, фаундером биржи WhiteBit, и вспомнил что крутил тестнет их проекта, за который они награждали 5 токенами WBT. На момент открутки эти токены стоили ~5$ что было беспонт

👍2🔥21

18 Jul 2026, 20:46 UTC69 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🩻 Недавно в моем городе выбили терминал, который распределял много почты. Посылочки раньше по UA доставляются прям очень быстро. Вечером заказываешь - утром получаешь. Однако после того как терминал покинул нас, то я ждал свои посылки аж ±6 дней. Спасибо, что не сгорели. 1. Непривычно 2. Офигеваешь когда кусок удобного сервиса откусили. ✈ Так вот, хотел сказать, цените быструю почту пока она есть.

🔥3👍21💯1

7 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC120 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Олды помнят Думал что у меня 2, но посмотрел в списочек, аж 3 шт Лукин собирал на шиншиллы ещё в 2022 Невероятный камбек из 2022. Иксы неизбежны.

👍1🔥1😁1

7 Jul 2026, 19:05 UTC103 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tonchinchiPhoto

💎All chinchillas are minted according to the plan! https://getgems.io/chinchillas

2 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC131 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Инференс (Inference) — Шеф готовит блюдо на выдачу Когда нейросеть долго обучают на терабайтах данных — это её «учеба в кулинарной академии». Но вот сеть обучена, и мы запускаем её в реальную жизнь. Инференс — это процесс работы уже обученной нейросети, когда она принимает новые данные и выдает готовый результат (прогноз, текст, ответ). Это её «рабочий режим». Аналогия с шефом: Обучение закончилось. Клиент делает зак

👍1😁1

1 Jul 2026, 19:05 UTC110 viewsread 8 August 2026

Кстати насчет странных Олимпийских игр на стероидах Вроде как не превзошли ни одного текущего результата "обычных" людей Так вот не превзошли очевидно потому что "обычные" атлеты так же принимают стероиды и возможно перестают их принимать в короткой промежуток перед "допинг" тестом. Если сравнить выступающих атлетов по габаритам то они такие же как и на обычных Олимп. играх. Очевидно, что спортсмены выступающие н

30 Jun 2026, 19:18 UTC97 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Представь, что нейросеть — это сверхкрутой шеф-повар-иностранец, который приехал открыть ресторан. Вот как в эту кухню вписываются наши три слова: Эмбеддинг (Embedding) — Перевод в секретный рецептурный код Компьютеры не понимают слова «яблоко» или «груша». Им нужны числа. Эмбеддинг — это перевод любого объекта (слова, картинки, звука) в вектор — длинный список чисел (координат), который отражает суть и смысл этого

1

28 Jun 2026, 14:49 UTC100 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чутка инфы от 🤖 Подумал что может быть интересно делится тем что изучаю и интересуюсь у ИИ. 🎨 Сегодня мне стало интересно такое: Всего в мире: криптовалютами пользуются около 740 миллионов человек (это примерно 8,5% населения Земли). Tether (USDT): количество пользователей превысило 534 миллиона. Большинство из них используют этот стейблкоин не для спекуляций, а как замену фиатному доллару для хранения сбережений

2

18 Jun 2026, 18:57 UTC146 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Решил зайти в интернет скачать картинки на рабочий стол по запросу "Башенный кран" Первые три ссылки и везде нужно заплатить монетку или зарегатся. Не заметил вообще как быстро такой интернет настал 😅

😁4👀3💯1😢1😱1🙈1

16 May 2026, 16:45 UTC197 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сверимся с ценой TON на основе инфы одно тоновчана? Что там к 2028, тон по 15-30? Солидно Нам бы вылезти и закрепится на 10 хотя бы... А то только петеплело и опять холодно становится. Что ж там Пашка придумает в следующем мтонга

🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoKotletaChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 848,990 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CryptoKotletaChannel” (@CryptoKotletaChannel), 173 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoKotletaChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.