Дуров кормит
👍8
Signed Jorh

Channel
@CryptoJorh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
894subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002119822955 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoJorh |
| Description | админ: @Jorh_Crypton |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoJorh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 894 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:10 | 894 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 19 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
135 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 75 | 55.6% | |
| 👍 | 60 | 44.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2026 to 13 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дуров кормит
👍8
Signed Jorh
слил по 170к за 10 минут до поста дурова 👍
😁11
Signed Jorh
x2 холжу дальше
👍6😁1
Signed Jorh | LOCK IN
чатик https://t.me/tolktoken
👍3😁1
Signed Jorh | LOCK IN
зашел сюда по 2к капе, монета ОГ EQCNAeGL6MTqitA85T6syhxIQ276hgw92e2HuJ7ejWapEhjU новый язык программирования специально для тона, по идее дуров в посте сегодня должен упомянуть его покупал тут 👉 DTrade
👍10😁4
Signed Jorh | LOCK IN
Кто-кто, а мурчик сезон тон мемов отрабатывает на 100% https://t.me/murchimpromemes
👍9
Signed Jorh
гм
👍11😁4
Signed Jorh
150m ✅
👍7
Signed Jorh
фомо по астероид сидел за пк целый день, отошел на пару мин и вот такое происходит, откупил по 55 млн капы, думаю 150 - 200 млн возможно сделать
😁6👍2
Signed Jorh
4:19 4:20
😁10
Signed Jorh
спасибо гейт, что огородили от профита 5к$ недозаработано
Signed Jorh
изи ставка, добирайте Yes пока дают
😁13
Signed Jorh
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @CryptoJorh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@CryptoJorh named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“0x.CryptoJorh” (@CryptoJorh), 894 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoJorh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.