Channel
@CryptoInstants
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
72subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001742353989 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoInstants |
| Description | @CryptoInstantsBot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoInstants |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 72 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 72 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
13 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 53.8% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 30.8% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 15.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2023 to 16 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
1/ What language should we primarily use?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
2/ What platform do you prefer to listen on?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
3/ What topics would you like us to cover in the next episode?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
4/ How often should we host the Podcast?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Crypto Instants 🌐 pinned «Press ✅ to collect 10 sats (රු. 2.47) from @CMNisal's faucet. 🚰 Remaining: 560 sats (රු. 138.21)/1,000 sats (රු. 246.80) (given to 44/100 users) 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ Chat with @BitcoinDeepaBot 👈 to manage your wallet.»
Press ✅ to collect 10 sats (රු. 2.47) from @CMNisal's faucet. 🚰 Remaining: 560 sats (රු. 138.21)/1,000 sats (රු. 246.80) (given to 44/100 users) 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ Chat with @BitcoinDeepaBot 👈 to manage your wallet.
Crypto Instants 🌐 pinned «Multicheque for 0.1 TON ≈ 0.56 USD Amount per activation: 0.001 TON ≈ 0.01 USD Total activations: 100»
Multicheque for 0.1 TON ≈ 0.56 USD Amount per activation: 0.001 TON ≈ 0.01 USD Total activations: 100
🔥1
🚀 If you’re on the hunt for hidden crypto gems, I’ve got you covered. Here’s a captivating Telegram channel where these elusive treasures are brought to light: Crypto Gems. Our mission? To unearth these gems. Your duty? Conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. If you stumble upon a promising gem or aspire to be a gem seeker, feel free to explore the channel using this link: Crypto Gem Chan…
https://t.me/tapswap_bot?start=r_196536622 🎁 +2.5k Shares as a first-time gift
🔑 Here's the Second Half of Your Code: _ _ _ _UOR3 🔑 @TokenSurge
🌟 Adventurers of @cryptoinstants! 🌟 In collaboration with our allies at @tokensurge, we present you a quest of discovery and reward! 🎉 🔑 Here's the Second Half of Your Code: _ _ _ _UOR3 🔑 But wait, there's a twist! To complete this code, you must seek the first half with @tokensurge. Only then can you unlock the full potential of what we've prepared for you. 💫 Complete the Code, Unlock the Mystery 💫 Join forces,…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoInstants. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
1/ What language should we primarily use?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
2/ What platform do you prefer to listen on?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
3/ What topics would you like us to cover in the next episode?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
4/ How often should we host the Podcast?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Are you Bullish?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2023 to 16 September 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Instants 🌐” (@CryptoInstants), 72 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoInstants.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.