One of my good friends will launch new project today, she was a good dev on ETH in the past, I will post it here later

Channel
CryptoGlobalExplore_Gems
@CryptoGlobalExplore_Gems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003663991713 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoGlobalExplore_Gems |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 2 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoGlobalExplore_Gems |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 10 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:39 | 10 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 2 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 27
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 21
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋 $1.3K LOL BUY! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 ➡️ SOL: 14.19 ($1.3K) ⬅️ LOL: 303K 👤 Buyer / Txn 🅿️ Position: +10% 💵 Wallet Value: $18K 👛 Notable Holdings: LOL ($11K), Monkey Cult ($7.4K) 📈 Marketcap: $4.23M 📊Chart | 🕵️ Calls |🏆 Trending 🕵️♂️TRENDING #2 on @SpyDefi
Achievement Unlocked: x90! ☄️ @NiksGambles made a x90+ call on Captcha (captch.... $35K ➡️ $3.3M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🔸 AKITAAI - TRENDING #2
⚠️⚠️⚠️ BREAKING: $500,000,000,000(billion) has been wiped out from gold’s market cap in just 6 minutes.
JUST IN: Bitcoin falls under $70,000 @WatcherGuru
A lot of charts look like this right now. Find memes with strong communities. Buy the bottom. Wait for the next pump. Believe in something. It's really that simple.
AWpD39myXc7emw5M9cMCofkbo92x5FKWdGHWYpZFdoge
Slowly, then all at once $HODL
Aping a bag here! Good utility live.. hype community and good volume!. Let's see how will goes. Mc now 700k$ https://dexscreener.com/solana/bch5me3iibayvifwdzh134jvgn6udbumbgmjjht8jj4k Please DYOR it's NFA
Aloka advocates peace & walks on BNB chain Peace be with you ✌🏼 https://x.com/alokadotlove/status/2021233475643228520?s=46
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @CryptoGlobalExplore_Gems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,092,850 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@WatcherGuru · 627,1203 postsShakers Calls
@marine_CryptoCalls · 73,6952 postsMcWhales Calls 🐳
@mcwhalescalls · 2,3492 postsOne man.eth
@asianmarketcall · 29,8931 postCRYPTO NEWS
@cryptocurrency_media · 103,8351 post💎 Elite Crypto Calls 💎
@EliteCryptoCalls · 3,5011 postSkyrim Gambles 🎲
@skyrimcallgamble · 11,1651 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoGlobalExplore_Gems” (@CryptoGlobalExplore_Gems), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoGlobalExplore_Gems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.