Channel
@CryptoFlash_1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
118subscribers
-162 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002248182819 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoFlash_1 |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoFlash_1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 118 | -18 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 136 | -60 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 196 | -83 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 279 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 279 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 280 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
244 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 82 | 33.6% | |
| ❤ | 42 | 17.2% | |
| 🤝 | 42 | 17.2% | |
| ⚡ | 41 | 16.8% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 15.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 244reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 18 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bonjour, le marché est au point mort comme toujours avant la réunion de la Fed! personne ne s'attend à une baisse des taux, la prévision est que le taux restera inchangé! l'économie américaine a de plus en plus de problèmes, ainsi qu'une forte baisse du PIB! c'est pourquoi je ne m'attends pas à ce que le marché valorise le positif et montre de la force après la réunion! je prévois plutôt une hausse de 1-2% et ensu…
🔥7⚡2👍2🤝2❤1
dans les scénarios les plus positifs, ils pourraient atteindre 78000 puis redescendre! si je vois une impulsion à la hausse, je prendrai probablement une position courte!
🔥4❤3⚡2🤝2👍1
BTC a atteint 74 000 et forme une compression pour une percée jusqu'à 84 000 ! Mais la hausse actuelle peut se terminer à tout moment et se transformer en chute, j'attends un renversement
🔥5❤3👍3🤝2⚡1
BTC a atteint 74 000 et forme une compression pour une percée jusqu'à 84 000 ! Mais la hausse actuelle peut se terminer à tout moment et se transformer en chute, j'attends un renversement
⚡3❤2👍1🔥1
BTC inchangé, a retiré la liquidité à 72 000 mais reste coincé dans le range latéral ! admissible de voir même plus haut, mais globalement rien ne change !
🔥5❤3⚡2👍2🤝1
Crypto pour vandalisme : une affaire retentissante en Corée du Sud Les forces de l'ordre ont démantelé un groupe qui acceptait des « commandes » d'intimidation via Telegram avec paiement en actifs numériques. Pour une récompense allant jusqu'à 700 $, les participants endommageaient des biens, menaçaient et commettaient des actes de vandalisme, y compris en laissant des excréments près des maisons. Une partie des s…
🔥5❤3👍3⚡2🤝2
Imaginez le prix du pétrole lorsque les pétroliers dans le détroit couleront sur fond de navires de la marine en flammes 😳
🔥4⚡3👍2❤1🤝1
Trump enverra la marine américaine pour assurer la sécurité du passage des pétroliers par le détroit d'Ormuz - le pétrole Brent à nouveau à 80$ ✊ Les marchés se stabilisent, mais pour l'instant c'est une promesse, pas une solution au problème. La longueur du détroit d'Ormuz atteint 160 km, la largeur sur toute sa longueur varie de 35 km à 100 km. Trump a fixé la tâche, mais sans contrôle des côtes, les navires de g…
🔥5⚡3👍3🤝3❤2
✅ Le BTC est revenu aux niveaux de la baisse nocturne en dessous de 65k $ suite à la chute du S&P 500. Mais l'or est de nouveau à 5 200 $ 🧪 Actualités du lundi : 🔸 Le Parlement européen a de nouveau reporté le vote sur l'accord commercial avec les États-Unis en raison de l'incertitude autour des nouveaux tarifs douaniers américains 🔸 Strategy a acquis 592 BTC supplémentaires (40 millions de $), et Bitmine a augme…
🔥4❤3🤝2⚡1👍1
Le marché des cryptos a certainement mieux traversé la journée d'hier, car il avait chuté la veille 😁 Aujourd'hui, les marchés devraient se soulager un peu : Trump a annoncé un accord commercial avec Taïwan et pourrait réduire les droits de douane sur l'acier et l'aluminium. En prime, la probabilité d'un nouveau shutdown partiel aujourd'hui s'est effondrée 🗽
⚡3❤2🔥2🤝2👍1
Chez JPMorgan, ils ont estimé que le coût de production du bitcoin est passé de 90k$ à 77k$. Cependant, malgré le prix actuel inférieur à ce niveau, la banque maintient un avis positif sur le marché des cryptos et une prévision à long terme pour le BTC à 266k$ 🤑 Pour le T4 2025, les revenus de Coinbase ont baissé de 20%, et la perte s'est élevée à 667 millions de dollars. Maintenant, on comprend pourquoi Brian Armst…
🔥6⚡3👍2🤝2❤1
BTC est vendu sur la peur - j'attends demain 64000-59000 et je vais accumuler des Longs ….
🔥4⚡3❤2👍2🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoFlash_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,572,059 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoÉclair” (@CryptoFlash_1), 118 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoFlash_1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.