Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

COMMUNICATION/ NEGOTIATION BOOKS

@CryptoEdgeDaily

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,192subscribers

-57 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002848126018
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoEdgeDaily
DescriptionBuy ads: https://telega.io/c/CryptoEdgeDaily Daily insights and verified updates from the world of cryptocurrency. Covering Bitcoin, Ethereum, Blockchain, Web3, DeFi, and the latest token trends — simplified and accurate. Stay sharp.
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoEdgeDaily

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@CryptoEdgeDaily/405 · this entry23 May 2026, 02:33 UTC@psychologyboooksss/52723 May 2026, 02:33 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoEdgeDaily/433 · this entry7 Jun 2026, 01:41 UTC@psychologyboooksss/5617 Jun 2026, 01:41 UTC1.00under a minute
@psychologyboooksss/60029 Jun 2026, 04:23 UTC@CryptoEdgeDaily/454 · this entry29 Jun 2026, 04:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoEdgeDaily/468 · this entry19 Jul 2026, 02:46 UTC@psychologyboooksss/61319 Jul 2026, 02:46 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoEdgeDaily/470 · this entry24 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC@psychologyboooksss/61424 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoEdgeDaily/476 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 05:49 UTC@psychologyboooksss/61531 Jul 2026, 05:49 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@psychologyboooksss6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (51)
@businessbooksssss5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (32)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 8 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 May 2026 to 31 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @CryptoEdgeDaily — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

17,19217,24917,220.57 August 2026 — 17,249 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,249 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,237 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,215 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,206 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,192 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 4 days, net -57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,183–17,258 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 23:5317,192-14
10 Aug 2026, 21:2817,206-9
9 Aug 2026, 21:1117,215-22
8 Aug 2026, 17:4117,237-12
7 Aug 2026, 19:0017,249no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:5417,249first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 6 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.54%
avg views ÷ 17,192 subscribers
Avg views / post
780
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held16 (6 May 202612 August 2026)
Views total3,900
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
52
Videos
1
Links
24

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2291.7%
👏14.17%
🔥14.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC193 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @selfhelpboooooooks

📚 17 UNIQUE BOOKS COLLECTION 💰 MONEY & WEALTH 1. The Millionaire Next Door 2. Secrets of the Millionaire Mind 3. FAKE: Fake Money, Fake Teachers, Fake Assets 4. Learn to Earn 🧠 MINDSET & PSYCHOLOGY 5. How Successful People Think 6. The Power of Your Subconscious Mind 7. Dark Psychology 8. The Mind of the Buyer 💼 BUSINESS & ENTREPRENEURSHIP 9. How to Write a Business Plan 10. The 4-Hour Workweek ×4 📈 SALES & NEGOTIATI

31 Jul 2026, 05:49 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 13 August 2026

Fooled by Randomness — Nassim Nicholas Taleb - Art of Man Making (Vol. 1) — Swami Chinmayananda - Elon Musk — Walter - Incerto 4-Book Bundle: Fooled by Randomness(Duplicate Copy) — Nassim Nicholas Taleb - Outlive (German Edition) — Peter Attia - Personality Development — Swami Vivekananda - The Brothers Karamazov: A New Translation — Michael R. Katz - The Complete Book of Yoga — Swami Vivekananda click here :

24 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 13 August 2026

📚 Bestselling Books Collection (2023–2025) ✅ Fourth Wing (Special Edition) – Rebecca Yarros ✅ Iron Flame – Rebecca Yarros ✅ Memory Rescue – Daniel G. Amen ✅ Onyx Storm (The Empyrean #3) – Rebecca Yarros ✅ Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions – Gary Klein ✅ StrengthsFinder 2.0 – Tom Rath ✅ The Body Keeps the Score – Bessel van der Kolk ✅ The Let Them Theory – Mel Robbins ✅ The Mountain Is You – Brianna Wiest ✅

19 Jul 2026, 02:46 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 13 August 2026

🚨 One decision can completely change your life. A year from now, you'll either thank yourself... or regret scrolling past this. This channel is built to help you become the best version of yourself through mindset, discipline, success, and self-improvement. The choice is yours. Only a few people have the courage to change their lives. Will you be one of them? 👇 Join now: https://t.me/addlist/jU7es5Odajc5NWJl

29 Jun 2026, 04:23 UTC≈2,380 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

📚 200+ Best-Selling Books Collection Unlock timeless knowledge with a curated collection of 200+ best-selling books covering: 💰 Finance & Investing 🧠 Psychology 🚀 Self-Improvement 📈 Business & Entrepreneurship 🎯 Productivity & Success ❤️ Relationships & More 👇 Check it out now: https://1024terabox.com/s/1BDTE3Gbm1oEKMCdH8t1X8w

3

13 Jun 2026, 15:47 UTC≈2,850 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Pay Yourself First Most people spend first and save what’s left. Successful people save first and spend what’s left. Your future wealth is built one small decision at a time. Save consistently. Invest wisely. Let time do the heavy lifting. Money grows when discipline meets patience. #Money #Wealth #FinancialFreedom

4🔥1

7 Jun 2026, 01:41 UTC≈2,990 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

A disciplined mind leads to happiness, an undisciplined mind leads to suffering. Your mind is either building your peace or destroying it — there is no in-between. Control your thoughts, and you control your life. #Mindset #Discipline #InnerPeace

1👏1

24 May 2026, 02:49 UTC≈1,660 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @booksshubbbPhoto

7 Pictures with Deep Meaning ⚜️📈

4

23 May 2026, 02:33 UTC≈1,940 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

13 Powerful Lessons from The Power of Habit by Charles Duhigg: 1. The Habit Loop Drives Behavior Every habit follows a simple loop: Cue → Routine → Reward. Understanding this loop is the key to changing any habit. 2. You Can’t Eliminate Habits — Only Replace Them Habits never truly disappear. To change one, keep the cue and reward the same, but change the routine. 3. Small Habits Create Big Results Tiny daily

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @CryptoEdgeDaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“COMMUNICATION/ NEGOTIATION BOOKS” (@CryptoEdgeDaily), 17,192 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoEdgeDaily.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.