Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DeFi - news, reviews, articles

@CryptoCoinPostICO

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,895subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001158187352
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoCoinPostICO
DescriptionCryptoCoinPost - https://t.me/CryptoCoinPost Manager - @Fesions
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/CryptoCoinPostICO

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@CryptoCoinPostICO/1249 · this entry17 Nov 2023, 07:45 UTC@NewCryptoJournal/201217 Nov 2023, 07:45 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoCoinPostICO/1251 · this entry25 Nov 2023, 12:49 UTC@NewCryptoJournal/201425 Nov 2023, 12:49 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoCoinPostICO/1254 · this entry5 Dec 2023, 13:15 UTC@NewCryptoJournal/20185 Dec 2023, 13:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoCoinPostICO/1256 · this entry26 Dec 2023, 13:02 UTC@NewCryptoJournal/202026 Dec 2023, 13:02 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoCoinPostICO/1259 · this entry16 Jan 2024, 13:00 UTC@NewCryptoJournal/202316 Jan 2024, 13:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoCoinPostICO/1260 · this entry17 Jan 2024, 10:43 UTC@NewCryptoJournal/202417 Jan 2024, 10:43 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@NewCryptoJournal9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (90)
@Crypt_Investment8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (80)
@SignalsFromCryptoJournal7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (70)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 November 2023 to 1 February 2024. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @CryptoCoinPostICO — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3,8956 Aug 2026, 04:25 — 3,895 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 04:31 — 3,895 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 04:256 Aug 2026, 04:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,891–3,899 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 04:313,895no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:253,895first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 November 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
688
Videos
22
Links
436

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

1 Feb 2024, 15:10 UTC≈8,230 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin's average annualized return over the past seven years has been 44 percent. At the same time, the result of traditional popular assets over the same time period is 5.7 percent.

1 Feb 2024, 15:04 UTC≈8,460 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Binance Delists ETH & BNB Spot Trading Pairs But There’s A Catch https://coingape.com/binance-delists-eth-bnb-spot-trading-pairs-but-theres-a-catch/?utm_source=Telegram&utm_medium=Mike

19 Jan 2024, 09:57 UTC≈6,340 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Binance exchange was able to successfully pass the crisis. Since the SEC's fine, the exchange has seen an inflow of $4.6 billion. At the same time, the top 1 exchange has stopped losing market share on the spot (BBG)

19 Jan 2024, 09:51 UTC≈4,900 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Binance Delists BTC, ETH, BNB Spot Trading Pairs But Here’s The Catch https://coingape.com/binance-delists-btc-eth-bnb-spot-trading-pairs-but-heres-the-catch/?utm_source=Telegram&utm_medium=Mike

17 Jan 2024, 10:45 UTC≈3,850 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Trading volumes with new Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S. have almost reached the $10 billion mark in three full days. The exact amount is 9.68 billion, most of which is accounted for by the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF.

17 Jan 2024, 10:43 UTC≈3,380 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Elon Musk’s X Faces Legal Blow As Court Rejects Appeal To Access Trump’s DMs https://coingape.com/elon-musk-x-faces-legal-blow-as-court-rejects-appeal-to-access-trump-dm/?utm_source=Telegram&utm_medium=Mike

16 Jan 2024, 13:00 UTC≈3,540 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Shiba Inu Burn Rate Rockets 1600% As Community Burns 89 Mln SHIB https://coingape.com/shiba-inu-burn-rate-rockets-1600-as-community-burns-89-mln-shib/?utm_source=Telegram&utm_medium=Mike

15 Jan 2024, 13:41 UTC≈4,720 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) now consists of 11,439 bitcoins, which is equivalent to $487 million. Moreover, these coins are unlikely to return to the market in the near future. Rather, the company will purchase additional BTC to work and develop its own product. For comparison, about 900 new coins are issued per day in the Bitcoin network. Well, the BlackRock ETF has been available for trading for

26 Dec 2023, 15:37 UTC≈4,140 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The share of ethers in circulation held by long-term investors surpassed the 70 percent mark for the first time in December 2023. We are talking about coin holders who purchased them more than a year ago. So there are enough patient ETH lovers today.

26 Dec 2023, 13:02 UTC≈3,390 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Billionaire Mark Cuban Offloads Polygon (MATIC) Holdings To Coinbase, Price Fell 5% https://coingape.com/billionaire-mark-cuban-offloads-polygon-matic-holdings-to-coinbase-price-fell-5/?utm_source=Telegram&utm_medium=Mike

5 Dec 2023, 13:28 UTC≈6,070 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The market capitalization of the industry's largest stablecoin, USDT, has surpassed $90 billion for the first time. This indicates serious demand for the token along with the desire of investors to transfer their fiat currencies into digital assets. Well, Tether is a giant, you can’t argue with that.

5 Dec 2023, 13:15 UTC≈3,760 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

BitMEX Announces Terra Classic (LUNC) Perpetual Contract Listing After USTC https://coingape.com/bitmex-announces-terra-classic-lunc-perpetual-contract-listing-after-ustc/?utm_source=Telegram&utm_medium=Mike

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoCoinPostICO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DeFi - news, reviews, articles” (@CryptoCoinPostICO), 3,895 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoCoinPostICO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.