https://x.com/wiseadvicesumit/status/2079533182958150075?s=20
Signed √π

Channel
@CryptoBharatTraders
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
628subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001413552426 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoBharatTraders |
| Description | Welcome to the heart of the Crypto Bharat community. Here you'll find everything you need to stay on top of the crypto game. News, Analysis, Defi Projects, ICO Announcements, AMAs, you ask for it! Enquiries - @sigma0981 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoBharatTraders |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 628 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 628 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 January 2026 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 71 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
https://x.com/wiseadvicesumit/status/2079533182958150075?s=20
Signed √π
https://x.com/whaleinsider/status/2074768986089111807?s=46
Signed √π
Sandisk at support , have some here at 1800$ level , exit if any 4h closes below 1700$
Signed √π
i think one crash is pending towards 52,800$ (reaction will be very voilent when btc will aproach here).
Signed √π
similarly gold (3930$) and silver (53.6$) are at 4year old support on 4h . Incase gold/silver flips below these levels exit longs untill then we are good.
Signed √π
$BTC 11year old support is being tested on 2D time frame. time has come , prepare your usdt 🙂↕ cmp - 60,900$
Signed √π
For perspective: ▸ ETH peaked at ~$140B+ MC ▸ BNB peaked at ~$100B+ MC ▸ SOL peaked at ~$75B+ MC $HYPE is currently around ~$18B MC. A move to: ▸ $50B MC = ~2.8x from here → HYPE ~$200–220 ▸ $100B MC = ~5.5x from here → HYPE ~$400–450 The question isn't whether it's mathematically possible. The question is whether Hyperliquid can keep dominating perp volume, retain users, and stay ahead of competitors. That's w…
Signed ∑ Sigma
On top of it . Saturn completed its 30 year zodiac cycle on 13th feb . So prepare for results !! Whatever you did in last 30 years you will get its results in next months (before june 2027) . You will see big shots gettings judgements , also jupiter is also here . Its very rare that two big shot planets come like this. So yupp just pray that punishment will be less harsh because punishment will be served for sure. If…
Signed √π
So yeah you weren’t the only one feeling the “uncertainty” 😂
Signed √π
https://www.hyperliquidr.xyz/post/hip-4-making-all-markets-hyperliquid
Signed √π
The planetary conjunction which will lead this is happening after more than 3 decades , so yeah you are lucky . The time for frustration and illusion will be coming to end very soon and you will feel it after 20th feb 💟
Signed √π
Also start loading btc below 60k to 50k (btc would not be going below 49k for sure) , bottom is very near . 🚀
Signed √π
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoBharatTraders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CB Ann.” (@CryptoBharatTraders), 628 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoBharatTraders.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.