Channel
@Cryptic_lb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
425subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001796747337 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cryptic_lb |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cryptic_lb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 425 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 426 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 426 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 16 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
28 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 42.9% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 17.9% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2025 to 22 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Окей, быстренько черкану эти самые планы, чтобы я смотрел (стыдился от отсутствия результатов) и не забывал. В ближайшее время по @MangoFreshBot: 1. Добавлю возможность получать подписки только по новому аналогу масс-фильтра, который будет работать исключительно для ваших инфлов (подойдёт тем, у кого инфлов в слежке много); 2. Добавлю возможность вручную смотреть последние подписки инфла (скорее всего бесплатно, но…
👍1
Бот заработал, даже быстрее стал. Буду дальше над ним работать, планы есть.
⚡3
На следующий же день старый хостинг (с Российским IP) получил блокировку доступа к серверам Телеграм. Даже обычные хостинги начали ебать за это. Бот заработает после полного переноса на новый хостинг. С компенсацией за неудобства. Конечно же, победа будет за нами! 🇷🇺
🤝1
Пока афк в Крипте, решил заняться перестройкой @MangoFreshBot бота и поиском лучшего оборудования. Кто пользовался/пользуется, замечал проблему, что иногда бот падал - это следствие использования дешёвых прокси, которые могут падать просто так (именно сам хостинг целиком). Альтернативу долго искал, но они были намного дороже, что существенно повысило бы стоимость бота раза в 2. А т.к. я не чсв уебан, чтобы за такой …
👍4
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3639075177 Мне помогло
🔥1🙏1
Эх, бедные владельцы других трекеров на подписки Твиттера и их клиенты... Апи и правда дорогое, и даже высокие цены на тарифы в их боте не спасут ситуацию. И все остальные парсеры-шмарсеры - шляпа. Правда, почему-то @MangoFreshBot уже больше 3-х лет (с декабря 22-го года) стабильно в онлайне находится с возможностью: 1. Оплаты тарифа в 15$/месяц или по рефералке/при пиаре получить подарочный доступ. 2. Следить за …
🙏1
ладно спасибо за альфу по метеоре
🤡3
https://met.meteora.ag/ клейм и пулить там же надо было скинуть
😭
Мне побрили 2500 $MET за контрибьютерскую аллоку за день до ТГЕ Нет слов)
👍3🔥1
Кому-то не раздали?
👍4
кто там ночами пулил долбаебы? 😂
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Cryptic_lb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 544,934 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cryptic” (@Cryptic_lb), 425 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cryptic_lb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.