Painting him was pretty fun. What do you think about him? Hope he will arrive in his new home very soon 🫶🏻
🔥8

Channel
@CrittexArtPalace
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
85subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003595267137 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CrittexArtPalace |
| Description | A channel where WIP paints and crafts from my Artist is displayed :) t.me/CrittexCritters crittex.eu |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 8 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CrittexArtPalace |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 85 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 85 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
83 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 68.7% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 24.1% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 3.61% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.41% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 1.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Painting him was pretty fun. What do you think about him? Hope he will arrive in his new home very soon 🫶🏻
🔥8
Here it is 🙏🏻
❤12
Does anyone remember that SpongeBob episode where Mr. Krabs plays the world’s smallest violin? 🎻😂 That’s exactly how I feel every time I grab this tiny detail brush. Painting individual fur strands is a ridiculous amount of work, and I’m pretty sure most people won’t consciously notice every single one of them. But together, they completely change how the fur looks and feels. It’s one of those details that takes h…
❤6
Progress shot! 🎨 One thing I absolutely love painting is fur texture. It’s definitely more work than going with a flat base color, but for me it’s worth every extra brush stroke. The trick isn’t using dozens of different colors. it’s mixing subtle variations from the same base tone and using them to create highlights, shadows and depth. Even though the mask surface itself is completely smooth, careful layering can…
❤8
One of my favorite parts of starting a new project: mixing the color palette. Before any details, textures or effects happen, it all starts here. I usually spend quite a bit of time adjusting tones and testing mixes until they match the vision I have in my head. A small change in saturation or warmth can completely change the final look of a character. This commission is still in its very early stages, but seeing t…
❤6
One of the best parts of doing this kind of work is seeing the moment a character actually “clicks” for someone. 🖤 The customer picked up FOXMINISTRATOR yesterday afternoon and already sent an in-action wearing video today for showing you critters. Because they were so excited to finally wear her. Seeing people genuinely happy when their sona comes to life like this honestly makes all the hours, layering, detailing…
❤6🔥3❤🔥2🍾1
Video, posted without a caption
❤6🔥3
“Foxministrator” is finally finished. ⚡🦊 This project became one of those masks where every single layer added more personality to the final result. I really wanted the contrast between organic fur texture and mechanical structures to feel balanced, not just “half animal, half machine,” but actually fused together like one entity. The UV reactive details were probably the most satisfying part to paint. Under blackl…
🔥5❤2
One of my favorite parts when working on cybernetic designs is balancing clean mechanical shapes with organic texture. I don’t want the circuits to look like they’re just painted on top. I want them to feel embedded into the mask itself, almost like glowing veins under metal plating. Under UV light the fluorescent pink starts reacting completely differently and suddenly all those layered details become way more vis…
❤5👀3
One thing I always try to avoid with mechanical patterns is making them feel too clean or flat. Even though these are painted details, I still want them to feel like they belong to the sculpt itself. Almost like actual embedded circuitry running underneath the surface. A lot of this process is layering outlines, shadows, reflections and tiny imperfections so the tech elements keep depth instead of looking like simpl…
❤6🔥1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @CrittexArtPalace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 201,452 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crittex Art Palace” (@CrittexArtPalace), 85 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CrittexArtPalace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.