Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

کریستال تیم | CRISTAL TEAM

@Cristal_Team

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

191subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001697960403
TypeChannel
Username@Cristal_Team
Description💎 ™ کریستال تیم ⚙ قدیمی ترین تیم رباتسازی در تلگرام 👨🏻‍💻 کار کردن فقط به زبان ( php ) 📟 و بیس های ( txt v json ) Towards ( 1k ) 🚀 Bot writing is done ✍ : @Metiym BotSaz Crystal 🎖 : @CrystalCreatebot BotSaz New : -
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Cristal_Team

Growth

1917 Aug 2026, 09:54 — 191 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:00 — 191 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:548 Aug 2026, 12:00
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 190–192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 12:00191no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:54191first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
109.1%
avg views ÷ 191 subscribers
Avg views / post
208
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.513%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (16 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total3,959
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥337.5%
225.0%
👍225.0%
👏112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC30 viewsread 8 August 2026

👨‍💻 جهت خرید حساب VIP به ادمین ها مراجعه کنید.

Signed Meti

7 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC77 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎊 رباتساز کریستال کریت آپدیت شد. 🔰 جزئیات : ➕ اضافه شدن بخش ارتقا حساب Vip با تعداد کریستال 180 ➕ اضافه شدن دو نوع جدید رباتساز میوه ای و الماس ➕ اضافه شدن بخش Vip ( بخش vip در پنل مدیریت ) ➕ اضافه شدن تبلیغ در رباتساز های Vip و حذف با هزینه 🔄 در آپدیت های بعدی رباتساز ها اضافه و منو تکمیل خواهد شد. 🤖 : @CrystalCreatebot ☎️ : @Metiym | @dev_crack 🆔 : @Cristal_Team

Signed Meti

5 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC40 viewsread 8 August 2026

توجه 📢 : 🛑 اختلالی در هاست بوجود آمده به محض اوکی شدن هاست آپدیت اعمال میشود و رباتساز آنلاین میگردد. 🤖 : @CrystalCreatebot

Signed Meti

1 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC106 viewsread 8 August 2026

توجه 📢 : 🎊 رباتساز کریستال کریت به حالت آپدیت رفت و خاموش شد. 🤖 : @CrystalCreatebot 🆔 : @Cristal_Team

Signed Meti

31 Jul 2026, 13:49 UTC349 viewsread 8 August 2026

🛑 لاین 353 دامنه با پوشه بزنید تا اجرا شه !

Signed Ńįģërřį

31 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC374 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

🤖 سورس کریستال کریت نسخه 10 🔐 پسوورد سورس : @CrystalCreatebot 🍓 این نسخه بدون باگ و سالم میباشد 🫐 3 پنل مجزا 🍉 جوین اجباری پیشرفته 🥒 ساخت انواع رباتساز های پیشرفته ( نسخه 9 ) 🍏 فول امنیت 🔓 اوپن شده در کریستال تیم : 🆔 : @Cristal_Team

Signed Meti

30 Jul 2026, 15:16 UTC116 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📈 آمار 200 🎊 ( آپدیت و فعال کردن بخش VIP در رباتساز شیشه ای ) 🤖 سه نوع رباتساز خفن به بخش VIP اضافه میگردد 🪎 با خرید و زدن کد هدیه هم میتوانید آن را بسازید. 🆔 : @CrystalCreatebot 🆔 : @Cristal_Team

1

Signed Meti

29 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC131 viewsread 8 August 2026

سرعت رباتساز به حالت قبلی خود بازگشت.🚀 🤖 : @CrystalCreatebot

Signed Meti

29 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC132 viewsread 8 August 2026

آپدیت 🎊 : حذف ربات رباتساز شیشه ای اضافه شد☑️ هم اکنون میتوانید رباتی ک در رباتساز شیشه ای میسازید را حذف کنید ❌ 🤖 : @CrystalCreatebot

Signed Meti

29 Jul 2026, 06:17 UTC298 viewsread 8 August 2026

آپدیت 🎊 : کد هدیه رباتساز شیشه ای اضافه شد. ✅❤️ 🤖 : @CrystalCreatebot

Signed Meti

28 Jul 2026, 22:31 UTC130 viewsread 8 August 2026

⚙ سیستم ربات در زیر مجموعه گیری : وقتی شما یک نفر را با لینک خود وارد ربات کنید به شما یک کریستال در رباتساز شیشه ای و یک کریستال در رباتساز دکمه ای تعلق میگیرد. ❄️🕹 ♥️ موفق باشید . 🤖 : @CrystalCreatebot

28 Jul 2026, 22:26 UTC110 viewsread 8 August 2026

بعد از دوسال بلاخره یه پروژه قوی نوشتیم 😍🤍 امیدوارم از رباتساز و آپدیت های آیندمون خوشتون بیاد 🫠❤️‍🩹 ☎️ : @Metiym | @dev_crack 🆔 : @Cristal_Team

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Cristal_Team. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTCAnonymous Poll35 voters

💎💎 آماده هستین حمایت کنید امشب رونمایی کنیم؟؟؟ از نسخه 12 کریستال کریت 🥰🔥

  1. Yes80%
  2. No31%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 101,845 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کریستال تیم | CRISTAL TEAM” (@Cristal_Team), 191 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cristal_Team.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.