Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CriptoGemas Calls

Channel

CriptoGemas Calls

@CriptoGemas_Anuncios

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,663subscribers

-1,364 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001671461751
TypeChannel
Username@CriptoGemas_Anuncios
DescriptionCanal de anuncios donde os traemos las mejores Gemas del ecosistema cripto. - Chat de Telegram: https://t.me/CriptoGemas_R4H - Twitter: https://x.com/CriptoGemas_R4H - CriptoGemas CEO & Owner: @angelfcc - PinkSale Partner - Tier 1: @IsmaelCripto
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CriptoGemas_Anuncios

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,66310,2399,4516 August 2026 — 10,027 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,008 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,971 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,890 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,845 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,780 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,718 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,667 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,594 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,433 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,296 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,082 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,907 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,239 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,172 subscribers26 September 2026 — 9,995 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,924 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,850 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,790 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,749 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,695 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,316 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,256 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,067 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,999 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,924 subscribers8 November 2026 — 8,663 subscribers6 August 20268 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 94 days, net -1,364. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,427–10,475 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 16:198,663-261
5 Nov 2026, 02:268,924-75
2 Nov 2026, 02:008,999-68
29 Oct 2026, 21:399,067-189
27 Oct 2026, 04:469,256-60
24 Oct 2026, 00:209,316-379
20 Oct 2026, 14:069,695-54
17 Oct 2026, 16:009,749-41
14 Oct 2026, 21:499,790-60
11 Oct 2026, 22:199,850-74
5 Oct 2026, 03:569,924-71
26 Sept 2026, 13:549,995-177
19 Sept 2026, 13:3710,172-67
17 Sept 2026, 02:2210,239+1,332
12 Sept 2026, 23:158,907-175
9 Sept 2026, 00:589,082-214
3 Sept 2026, 23:179,296-137
1 Sept 2026, 00:459,433-161
28 Aug 2026, 15:459,594-73
25 Aug 2026, 05:029,667first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 8,663 subscribers
Avg views / post
980
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.839%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held83 (18 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total17,635
Reactions total148
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 23:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,900
Videos
≈191
Links
≈4,890

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
55s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

673 reactions across 63 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14020.8%
❤9814.6%
👍9313.8%
💯7811.6%
🌚608.92%
🐳497.28%
🏆304.46%
👏243.57%
👀152.23%
🤩131.93%
✍121.78%
🤯121.78%
👌111.63%
🍾81.19%
⚡71.04%
🌭60.892%
🤝50.743%
😱40.594%
🎉30.446%
🦄30.446%
2 further kinds20.297%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 673 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (11.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 22:33 UTC621 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🟢$SI - ⚪️ UPDATE: @SpaceXinuSI lleva 7x desde dip 📈 ✅ Enlace a la call: https://t.me/CriptoGemas_Anuncios/5830 ATH tras ATH ⚡️ Gema de BSC 💎 enhorabuena a todos los que aprovechasteis esta gran oportunidad e invertisteis en el dip haciendo hold. El Dev es alpha y así siempre lo ha demostrado en sus proyectos, además de que en este no es una simple memecoin sino que ha incorporado utilidad. 📊 Economía: - Tax: 3…

🐳1👏1🤯1

8 Nov 2026, 05:40 UTC879 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🟢$SI - ⚪️ UPDATE: @SpaceXinuSI lleva 16x desde su launch 📈 ✅ Enlace a la call: https://t.me/CriptoGemas_Anuncios/5830 PUSH NOCTURNO📈 como ya es de costumbre con este based dev, ha trabajado un buen marketing junto con anuncios del proyecto para romper ese ATH. Como os decimos siempre, la mejor campaña de publicidad para un token es una gráfica bullish y este dev se sabe la regla al pie de la letra. 📊 Economía: …

❤1🏆1👍1

6 Nov 2026, 06:24 UTC841 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🟢$SI - ⚪️ UPDATE: @SpaceXinuSI lleva 13x desde su launch 📈 ✅ Enlace a la call: https://t.me/CriptoGemas_Anuncios/5826 ATH tras ATH ⚡️ Gema de BSC 💎 enhorabuena a todos los que aprovechasteis esta gran oportunidad e invertisteis en el dip haciendo hold. El Dev es alpha y así siempre lo ha demostrado en sus proyectos y este pinta ser el más top al tener también parte de utilidad. 📊 Economía: - Tax: 3/3 - MC: 625…

❤3🌚2🏆1

4 Nov 2026, 21:06 UTC911 views9 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🟢$SI - ⚪️ UPDATE: @SpaceXinuSI lleva 2,5x desde dip 📈 ✅ Enlace a la call: https://t.me/CriptoGemas_Anuncios/5826 Slow Moon y a por su ATH ⚡️ ya os comentábamos que se trataba de una buena oportunidad para meterle al dip porque se venía push, esperemos que aprovecharais nuestra call. El Dev se encuentra realizando un excelente trabajo, la gráfica habla por si sola. 📢 RAID: https://x.com/CriptoGemas_R4H/status/2…

💯3🐳2👀2❤1🏆1

31 Oct 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,040 views43 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🔥NUEVO VIDEO💎 Tenemos NUEVO video en el canal de YouTube de CriptoGemas, donde compartimos las noticias más relevantes de la semana! 💥💥¡Binance HACKEADO!💥💥 🎥Enlace al video: https://youtu.be/2t3JzNz8jtA Se agradece que apoyen las publicaciones con: ✅Like y RT al tweet ✅Like y comentario en el video 👉¡No olviden suscribirse al canal!😍 💬 Enlace al tweet: https://x.com/CriptoGemas_R4H/status/2116589481071448280

🔥12👀7🤯7👏6💯3❤2🤩2⚡1

30 Oct 2026, 17:54 UTC929 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🟢$SI - ⚪️ UPDATE: @SpaceXinuSI está a punto de iniciar push 🚀 ✅ Enlace a la call: https://t.me/CriptoGemas_Anuncios/5823 SE VIENE PUSH📈 la última vez que dimos call de dip en este token, el dev nos dio grandes beneficios y ahora nos ha vuelto a dar señal para poder comprar. Ya vieron los resultados anteriormente así que poco más hay que añadir. 📊 Economía: - Tax: 3/3 - MC: 215k - Holders: 1,710 📄CA: 0x725ccc7b…

🏆2🔥1🤩1

29 Oct 2026, 17:43 UTC≈1,020 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🟢$TART - ⚪️ UPDATE: @TartSwap hizo 40x desde su launch 📈 ✅ Enlace a la call: https://t.me/CriptoGemas_Anuncios/5805 ATH tras ATH ⚡️ Gema de BSC 💎 enhorabuena a todos los que aprovechasteis esta gran oportunidad e invertisteis en el dip haciendo hold. El Dev es alpha y así siempre lo ha demostrado en sus proyectos y este pinta ser el más top al ser un utility token. 📢 RAID: https://x.com/criptogemas_r4h/status/2…

❤2🌚2🔥2

27 Oct 2026, 22:23 UTC≈1,030 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🟢$SI - ⚪️ UPDATE: @SpaceXinuSI lleva +150% desde dip 📈 ✅ Enlace a la call: https://t.me/CriptoGemas_Anuncios/5820 Slow Moon ⚡️ ya os comentábamos que se trataba de una buena oportunidad para meterle al dip porque se venía push, esperemos que aprovecharais nuestra call. El Dev se encuentra realizando un excelente trabajo, la gráfica habla por si sola. 📊 Economía: - Tax: 3/3 - MC: 425k - Holders: 1,660 📄CA: 0x7…

👏3🌚2🐳2

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @CriptoGemas_Anuncios. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@CriptoGemas_Anuncios edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Anuncios Baby Doge
@BabyDogeAnnES · 75,264
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CriptoGemas Calls” (@CriptoGemas_Anuncios), 8,663 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CriptoGemas_Anuncios.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.