Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

@ 𝟣ˣ𝟣ˣ𝟣ˣ𝟣

@CreationOfHatred_AS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004466536207
TypeChannel
Username@CreationOfHatred_AS
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 11 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CreationOfHatred_AS

Growth

12141314 Aug 2026, 04:34 — 12 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 04:46 — 12 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 08:04 — 14 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 04:3415 Aug 2026, 08:04
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 08:0414+2
14 Aug 2026, 04:4612no change
14 Aug 2026, 04:3412first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
132.5%
avg views ÷ 14 subscribers
Avg views / post
18.6
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
39.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held20 (11 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total371
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 4 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52201087448216016021336.1%
custom 5246960798751815614719.4%
custom 5395790314730444608411.1%
❤‍🔥38.33%
custom 528285428712106802925.56%
custom 544313872998625609625.56%
💘25.56%
custom 531430616512596667212.78%
custom 545615613161533383912.78%
12.78%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC10 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026

📌🤩 🌟🌟 🤩🟢HATRED 🎀Весь день просидел дома. Голова вроде перестала болеть, так что можно и прогуляться, желательно подальше от остальных киллеров. Их смазливые недовольные рожи я сегодня уже видеть не хочу, сыт по горло. ‼️🤩Кстати говоря, в последнее время заметил, что слишком сильно разленился, из дома не выхожу совсем. Нужно возвращаться в тонус.

custom 52201087448216016023custom 52469607987518156143custom 53957903147304446081

13 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC11 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheLastGuest_Daisy

Posted without readable text

13 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC10 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @bl0g1x1x1x1Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ೀ܀⊹˙┆ ☣️🔤🔤🔫𝜗┆˙⊹܀ೀ [🍋‍🟩🩻⚔️] — 4РГХХ!! Д4 к4к!.. 4 в0т. Вс3м д0бр0г0 вр3м3н1.. 4й, д4 ид1т3 н4х//! Я в1д3л к4к м0и н3кот0ры3 зн4к0мые в3ли Т3легр4мм к4нал пр0 св0ю ж1знь и н4зыв4л1 эт0.. Бл0г, п0 мо3му. Н3 з4п0мнил. Я р3шил т0же п0пр0бов4ть. Н3 об3щаю п1с4ть прям вс3. Кхм.. Ну н4верн0е пр1шл0 вр3мя пр3дстав1ться. Мо3 1мя 1х1х1х1, кр4тче м0жн0 1х4. Я в0ссозд4ние к0е чь3й нен4вист1. Д4же пр0т1вно н4зывать э

13 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC7 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @doctor_twotimePhoto

💉 .•.° • ✦ •° .•. 💉 𝑹𝑻 ╭─────── ✦ ───────╮ ✦°• — Отыскать личный архив этого доктора среди сотен чужих блогов — непосильная задача, которая заберет у вас слишком много сил... ★°• — Вы правы, здешние операции требуют идеальной тишины и запредельного фокуса. Но готовы ли вы доверить свою жизнь... Ту Тайму?  ╰───────

13 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC7 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @two_time_jesterPhoto

ᴏʜ.. ᴡᴇʟᴄᴏᴍᴇ 2 ᴍʏ ʙʟᴏɢ !! –heey..~ —оо, я обожаю скин джестера на ту тайме!! Может есть кто тоже их любит? (Я например?) —а есть ли блог по джестеру, а не обычному ту тайму?? —обоже, у меня новый любимый скин на тайме ★ It's funny, bro ★ Навигации ★

13 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC24 views11 reactionsread 14 August 2026

📌🤩 🌟🌟 🤩🟢HATRED 🎀Поспал пару часов. ##### , лучше бы вообще не ложился. Теперь чувствую себя еще более паршиво, чем до этого. 🎀А это что еще за сообщение.. 🤩 Anon asked: “Какое у тебя самое любимое занятие?” 🎀Любимое занятие? Мхх… Да ### его знает, если честно. Какого-то одного, чтобы прям самого любимого нет, но мне нравится иногда выходить тренироваться сражаться на мечах, правда это быстро надоедает. Иногда про

custom 52469607987518156144custom 52201087448216016023custom 54431387299862560962custom 53143061651259666721custom 54561561316153338391

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CreationOfHatred_AS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,225,747 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@ 𝟣ˣ𝟣ˣ𝟣ˣ𝟣” (@CreationOfHatred_AS), 14 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CreationOfHatred_AS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.