4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 592–599 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 13:42
595
+2
15 Aug 2026, 16:46
593
-5
8 Aug 2026, 03:15
598
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:04
598
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.4%
avg views ÷ 595 subscribers
Avg views / post
145
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
9 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,305
Reactions total
89
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 29s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
89 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5287270127681699873
30
33.7%
custom 5454142036766650305
24
27.0%
custom 5397584026217241886
11
12.4%
custom 5231048400186655521
7
7.87%
custom 5395506000780351745
6
6.74%
custom 5210962345676784960
5
5.62%
custom 5253998884350354489
5
5.62%
custom 5274182486157453194
1
1.12%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Аварийный режим кожи: как вы сами провоцируете жирный блеск
Вчера большинство выбрало вариант №2 — и да, попали в точку.
Продолжаем разбирать тот самый вымытый липидный «цемент». Вы умылись до скрипа, прошлись кислотами, подсушили всё, что блестит… Кажется, кожа теперь должна стать идеально матовой.
А она почему-то начинает блестеть ещё сильнее. Почему?
1. Влага просто уходит
Повреждённый барьер хуже удерживает …
Почему кожа то Сахара, то тропики? Разбираемся с липидным барьером — часть 1
Одна из самых частых историй в анкетах моих девочек:
«Лицо жирнится так, что к обеду можно жарить блинчики… но при этом после умывания всё стягивает, щиплет и шелушится».
И тут обычно начинается:
«Наверное, мне нужны кислоты?»
«А может, гиалуронка?»
«Или крем пожирнее, чтобы наверняка?»
Стоп. Положите банку обратно🙈
Потому что жирный бл…
Если вы тоже уже неделю видите этот рецепт в ленте - знайте, он не зря стал вирусным. 😄
В оригинале делают со страчателлой, но сегодня у меня дома была рикотта. И знаете что? Получилось ничуть не хуже.
🥣 Просто смешала:
• рикотту (или страчателлу);
• баночку икры сельди;
• мелко нарезанный лук.
Всё. Намазала на хрустящий багет, сверху немного укропа — и это оказалось невероятно вкусно.
Рикотта делает намазку боле…
Минус «поплывший» овал — плюс четкий профиль. ✨
Иногда для гармонизации лица не нужны глобальные изменения. Достаточно правильно подчеркнуть углы нижней челюсти и подбородок.
Именно они создают тот самый четкий контур лица, делают профиль более выразительным и визуально подтягивают нижнюю треть.
На фото — естественный результат без эффекта «перекачанного» лица. Просто более собранный, гармоничный и красивый профил…
Это я к чему, девочки мои.
Зашла я значит в Fix Price за книжками для моих малышек с наклейками, мы их очень любим.
И посетила мою неспокойную голову мысль о том - «было бы интересно вам разбирать составы бюджетных средств?»
Недолго думая сфоткала пару баночек и вот ловите первый разбор.
Как говорится «не все то золото, что блестит» 😄
Поехали:
1. SADOER Гидратирующая сыворотка с гиалуроновой кислотой ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (7/10)
…
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Cosmetolog_plotnikova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Косметолог | Плотникова О.С” (@Cosmetolog_plotnikova), 595 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cosmetolog_plotnikova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
