4 measurements spanning 15 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116–117 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 07:25
116
-1
14 Aug 2026, 22:04
117
+1
9 Aug 2026, 05:16
116
no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:18
116
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.3%
avg views ÷ 116 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.0
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (30 June 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
170
Reactions total
13
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
81 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
50
61.7%
🔥
26
32.1%
💘
2
2.47%
⚡
1
1.23%
🎉
1
1.23%
🤔
1
1.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هل تعرّفت على لجان مشروع الربيع العربي الثقافي؟ ✨
ما رأيك أن تخوض هذا الاختبار التفاعلي؟ سيساعدك على اكتشاف اللجنة التي تناسب اهتماماتك وشخصيتك، وفي الوقت نفسه ستستمتع بتجربةٍ ممتعة.
https://uquiz.com/xRZJ7R
هيا جرّب الاختبار، ولا تنسَ مشاركتنا بنتيجتك!
🚨 إعلان هام!
هل تعلمون ما هي لجان مشروع الربيع العربي الثقافي، وما الأدوار التي تؤديها؟ إليكم نبذةً مختصرة عنها.
لجنة الإعلام:
المرآة التي تعكس كيان المشروع، والصوت الذي يصل إلى الجمهور، والعدسة التي توثق لحظاته، والقلم الذي ينقل أحداثه؛ تتولى إدارة منصات التواصل الاجتماعي للمشروع، وتُبرز هويته ورسالته، ليصل أثره إلى الجميعً.
لجنة التدريبات العامة:
وراء كل إنجاز رحلةٌ من التعلم، ومن هنا تنطلق لجنة التدريبات؛ لتحوّل…
«إنْ أردتَ تجنُّب العشوائيّة وضياع وقتك، فلا بدَّ لك من وضع خطّةٍ.»
لا بدَّ أنّكم سمعتم بهذا الأمر من قبل وتعرفون أهميّته لأيّ عملٍ مهما كان، فما مدى أهميّة التّخطيط في اللّجنة؟
أنا المسابقاتيُّ هنا لأخبركم بنبذةٍ عن رحلة التّخطيط وسيرها، فهيا نبدأ الرّحلة.
في الرّبيع عامّةً هناك قاعدةٌ مهمةٌ يسير عليها أيُّ ربيعيٍّ، وهي: «الموازنة بين حياتك الواقعيّة والرٍبيع»؛ وذلك كي لا يتأثّر أحدهما بالآخر، وإن كانت الأولويّة …
لمَ استحقَّ ذلك المتسابق أنْ يفوز؟ وعلى أيِّ أساسٍ نقرِّر هذا؟ أسئلةٌ راودت أغلبكم واليوم وتحت مسمَّى «ميزان العدل» سأخبركم أنا المسابقاتيّ، أكثر عن هذا الأساس كإجابةٍ.
عمليّة التّقييم تُعنى بمنحِ الأعمال درجاتٍ معيّنةٍ بناءً على أساسٍ واضحٍ ومنطقيّ، فمثلاً: عملٌ ما تمّ تقييمه بخمس درجاتٍ من أصل عشر وآخر تمّ تقييمه بتسعِ درجاتٍ، العمل الأوّل كان به العديد من النّواقص لذا تمّ إعطاءه تلك الدّرجة عكس العملِ الآخر.
ولك…
لا تتزاحموا، فالآيسكريم يكفي الجميع...
وبالنكهة التي تُفضّلون!
مواكبةً لأجواء الصيف، جهّزنا لكم اختبارًا تفاعليًا يحمل الكثير من المتعة والتشويق. 👇🏻
https://uquiz.com/eQDTSr
خوضوا التجربة الآن، واكتشفوا النكهة التي تشبهكم، واللجنة التي تنتظركم، ولا تنسوا مشاركتنا بنتيجتكم! ✨
ثم اطّلعوا على روابط لجاننا 👀 .
https://lnk.bio/arabicspringpro
هَل سمعتم آخر الأخبار؟
تقولُ الإشاعاتُ إنَّ الأصواتَ في بُرجِ الأرواحِ لا تهدأ أبدًا؛ فتلك الأرواحُ البرتقاليَّةَ غريبةٌ بعضَ الشَّيء؛ تُحبُّ التَّنافس، وتعشقُ كلَّ ما يُسمَّى بالمُسابقات.
ويستطيعون تحويلَ أبسطِ الأشياء إلى أفكارٍ مُبتكرةٍ، وصناعةَ مسابقاتٍ من أمورٍ قد تبدو عاديَّةً في نظرِ الآخرين؛ لأنَّ خيالهم لا يعرفُ التَّوقُّف.
في ذلك البرج، لا تعملُ روحٌ وحدها بل يكمِّل بعضهم بعضًا، فيتطوَّرون معًا، ويتبادلو…
لجنة المُسابقات pinned «لم يكن برج المسابقاتِ يومًا إلَّا بيئةً للإبداعِ والابتكارِ، وكما أحيا المواهب بمسابقاته، فعل ذات الشيء مع أرواحهِ. ومشمش هنا ليعطيكم نبذةً عما سيكتسبه كلٌّ منكم داخل اللَّجنة. أوَّلًا: تطوير مهارةِ الكتابةِ. ستتعلَّمون كيفيَّة كتابة مختلف المنشورات والفصول…»
إنّ المُسابقة مهما بلغت مِن التّفرّد والتّميّز، تحتاج إلى عمليّةٍ أخرى تجعل المشاركين يعرفون بوجودها أوَّلًا، وتجذب الجمهور إليها ثانيًا.
قد تتساءلون: هل الأمر ضروريٌّ حقًا؟ أنا المسابقاتيّ هنا لأخبركم بأهمّيّةِ عمليّتيّ التّرويج والنّشر.
إنّ عمليّةَ النّشر يُعنى بها الإعلان عن المسابقةِ للغير، والتَّعريف بها وبشروطها وبجوائزها وبكيفيّةِ التّقديم لها، وغيرها مِن التّفاصيل المهمّةِ.
بعد النّشر يبقى سؤالٌ مهمٌّ: كيف…
حين كنَّا صغارًا، كانتِ الحكايات عوالم بلا حدودٍ، نمضي بين سطورها بقلوبٍ خفيفةٍ وأعينٍ مغمورةٍ بالدَّهشة.
نرى الخير نقيًّا لا يشوبه شيءٌ، ونؤمن أنَّ الظَّلامَ ليس سوى محطَّةٍ عابرةٍ يبدِّدها البطل في اللَّحظةِ الأخيرة.
كانتِ القصص يومئذٍ امتدادًا لبراءتنا، وكانتِ الحياة تبدو أبسط مِنْ أنْ تُخفِي وجهًا آخر.
لكنَّنا كبرنا وخطونا نحو عتبةِ البلوغ، أوصدنا ذلك الباب خلفنا بحسمٍ شديدٍ وظنَّنا أنَّ تلك القصص مضتْ وصارتْ …
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Contest_Team. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 100,450 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لجنة المُسابقات” (@Contest_Team), 116 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Contest_Team.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.