Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇺🇦Constructivisme Vitaliste🇺🇦

Channel

🇺🇦Constructivisme Vitaliste🇺🇦

@Constructivisme_Vitaliste

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

445subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001343689025
TypeChannel
Username@Constructivisme_Vitaliste
Created11 April 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Constructivisme_Vitaliste

Growth

4454474466 August 2026 — 447 subscribers7 August 2026 — 447 subscribers14 August 2026 — 445 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 445–447 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:15445-2
7 Aug 2026, 17:47447no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:16447first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 June 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

224 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10245.5%
👍6930.8%
❤‍🔥167.14%
146.25%
🤩83.57%
🙏62.68%
🌚20.893%
💯20.893%
🏆10.446%
🐳10.446%
👎10.446%
👏10.446%
🥱10.446%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2023 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jun 2026, 19:08 UTC406 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

​​Технореалізм II: Техне логосу та рабська мораль

👍41🐳1

2 Jun 2026, 18:22 UTC404 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Технореалізм I — Народження поліса і типу людини

👍9👎1

12 Oct 2025, 16:37 UTC919 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

​​Симпатія альтернативної правиці до Росії є тривожним відхиленням від її власних засад. Війна в Україні демонструє саме ті цінності — націоналізм, військову честь і збереження культури — які ця правиця проголошує своїм ідеалом. Українські солдати воюють не за якусь абстрактну ідеологію, а за конкретну реальність — за свої домівки й за свою Батьківщину. Їхні лідери звертаються до історії не для того, щоб задобрити чу

👍71❤‍🔥1

20 Mar 2025, 18:03 UTC650 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Нація, яка володіє сотнями ядерних боєголовок, але більше не має дітей, залишає свої кордони відкритими й дозволяє іноземним етнічним групам завойовувати свій внутрішній життєвий простір, не тільки далека від того, щоб бути «великою державою», але й фактично зазнає поразки у війні, попри розмір свого збройного арсеналу, який, таким чином, виявляється абсолютно безпорадним. Ґійом Фай: За конструктивне войовниче мисле

👍82💯1

18 Mar 2025, 19:53 UTC739 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Бо саме зі смерті, дочки битви, народжується життя та нові здібності. XXI сторіччя не має породити поліційний та авторитарний «новий порядок», натомість це буде сторіччя війни з несподіваним та нещадним добором. Ґійом Фай: За конструктивне войовниче мислення. Частина 1

👍4🔥3🤩2💯1

15 Mar 2025, 20:53 UTC445 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Запрошувальне посилання. Канал буде закритим. https://t.me/+m6BX1Cugh1JkYmVi

🌚2

6 Feb 2025, 21:09 UTC535 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Філософія життя перед лицем виродженого мислення. Частина 4

🔥8👍1👏1

18 Jan 2025, 20:42 UTC947 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

​​Проживання – це екзистенційна та етологічна функція, яку Гайдеґґер і Лоренц описували, кожен своєю мовою, як важливу для психологічної рівноваги індивідів і груп. Але система перетворює нас на резидентів, а не мешканців. Лицемірне збереження територіальних відмінностей у правовому плані та в плані індивідуального митного контролю, як і перетворення національних кордонів на пункти оплати за проїзд або поліційні пост

🙏6🔥2🏆1

17 Jan 2025, 17:41 UTC825 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Система убивства народів: I Від цивілізації до системи. Частина 1

🤩41

20 Aug 2024, 17:21 UTC≈1,290 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Система убивства народів

🔥12👍5

22 Jul 2024, 20:14 UTC≈1,200 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Огляд на цікаву книжечку де йдеться про цікаве явище та неоднозначних персонажів європейського соціалізму🤫🧨але це трохи не те, про що Ви всі подумали прочитавши страшне "соціалізм"🫣 Institut ILIADE: «Народні герої безсмертні».

👍6🔥5

7 Jul 2024, 18:08 UTC≈1,230 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Жан Монталь: Пошуки безмежного і європейська непосидючисть

🔥8👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Constructivisme_Vitaliste. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 811,911 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Ґійом Фай (uk.wikipedia.org)
“…конструктивізм: https://t.me/Constructivisme_Vitaliste {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210416131727/https://t.me/Constructivisme_Vitaliste…”
read 16 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇺🇦Constructivisme Vitaliste🇺🇦” (@Constructivisme_Vitaliste), 445 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Constructivisme_Vitaliste.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.