مدل Opus 5 هم آمد ... Opus 5 Why Claude switched models in your conversation with Opus 5
Signed Behnam Yousefimehr

Channel
@ComputerScienceBY
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
801subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001980316490 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ComputerScienceBY |
| Description | کانال علوم کامپیوتر ارتباط با ادمین: @behnamy2010 Linkedin: Linkedin.com/in/behnam-yousefimehr Email: behnam.y2010@aut.ac.ir بهنام یوسفی مهر |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ComputerScienceBY |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 801 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 801 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (20 May 2026 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,276 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
مدل Opus 5 هم آمد ... Opus 5 Why Claude switched models in your conversation with Opus 5
Signed Behnam Yousefimehr
در مدل جدیدی به اسم bina که برای ocr زبان فارسی فاین تیون کردن با عملکردی خیره کننده نسبت به مدلهای سطح یک دنیا در رتبه ۱ برتری خودشو نشون داد https://huggingface.co/Reza2kn/Bina-0.1
Signed Behnam Yousefimehr
شاید براتون سوال باشه الان بهترین مدلهای زبانی هوش مصنوعی کدوما هستن؛ چه بهصورت کلی، چه برای تسکهای خاص مثل کدنویسی، ریاضی، تحلیل داده و… سایت LiveBench یه لیدربورد بهروز از مدلهای مختلف داره که میتونید عملکردشون رو در دستهبندیهای مختلف ببینید، امتیاز هر زیرتسک رو بررسی کنید و حتی هزینهی استفاده از مدلها رو کنار امتیازها مقایسه کنید. لینک: https://livebench.ai
Signed Behnam Yousefimehr
اگر وردپرسی دارین که از نسخه اش از ۷.۰.۲ قدیمی تر است، سریعا آپدیتش کنین. دو تا مشکل امنیتی خیلی حاد هست که داره به شکل فعال برای حمله به سایت ها استفاده می شه. یک حمله sql injection و یک مشکل در REST API که اجازه اجرای کد از راه دور رو می ده. آپدیت همیشه مهمه، الان در وردپرس الزامی.
Signed Behnam Yousefimehr
شرکت OpenAI مدل صوتی جدید GPT-Live-1 رو عرضه کرده که صدای اون طبیعی تر هست و یک مدل Full-Duplex محسوب میشه در نتیجه به طور همزمان هم میتونه صحبت کنه هم به حرفای شما گوش بده. بنابراین با این مدل، کاربران میتونن مثل یک مکالمه عادی، روی صحبتهای مدل وقفه بندازن و حرفشون رو بزنن بدون اینکه روی حرفای بعدی مدل اختلالی ایجاد بشه. همچنین چنین چیزی قابلیتهایی مثل ترجمه زنده و همزمان رو هم ممکن میکنه. این مدل صوتی به مدلهای ج…
Signed Behnam Yousefimehr
خلاصه دو پست بالایی اینه که از یک طرف، SpaceXAI مدل جدید Grok 4.5 رو با همکاری Cursor عرضه کرده که توی کدنویسی عملکردی عالی در سطح Claude Opus 4.8 داره و با مصرف توکن کمتر، هزینهها رو هم به شدت کاهش داده. از طرف دیگه، OpenAI هم سری جدید GPT-5.6 رو منتشر کرده که شامل سه مدل با کاربری متفاوته: مدل Sol که قدرتمندترینِ این سریه و برای تحلیلهای پیچیده و امنیت طراحی شده، مدل Terra که تعادلِ ایدهآلی بین سرعت و قدرت ایجاد…
Signed Behnam Yousefimehr
شرکت SpaceXAI مدل جدید Grok 4.5 رو عرضه کرده که قدرت کدنویسی در سطح Claude Opus 4.8 رو با هزینه ای بسیار کمتر در اختیار کاربران قرار میده. این مدل که با همکاری Cursor توسعه داده شده، طبق تستهای Artificial Analysis در کدنویسی با ایجنتها، قدرتی بالاتر از Opus 4.8 و نزدیک به GPT 5.5 و Fable 5 رو از خودش نشون داده. همچنین نه تنها مصرف توکنهای اون بین 3 تا 5 برابر از مدلهای Claude کمتر بوده، بلکه برای اجرای این تستها در…
Signed Behnam Yousefimehr
شرکت OpenAI رسما مدلهای GPT 5.6 رو به طور رسمی برای تمام کاربران عرضه کرده. این مدلها حدود دو هفته رونمایی شدن ولی در اون زمان فقط در دسترس شرکتهای خاصی بودن ولی حالا OpenAI مجوز عرضه عمومی اونهارو از دولت امریکا دریافت کرده. این سری از مدلها شامل سه مدل هستن که Sol قویترین اونهاست، Terra تعادلی بین سرعت و قدرت داره و Luna برای سرعت و قیمت پایین بهینه شده. مدل Sol قویترین مدل این شرکت تاکنون هست و عملکرد بالایی در…
Signed Behnam Yousefimehr
با سلام در صورتی که دانشجویی به دنبال فرصت کارآموزی باشد، چند موقعیت کارآموزی در صنعت موجود است که امکان معرفی برای آنها را دارم. در صورت تمایل لطفاً رزومه خود را برای من ایمیل کنید. Behnam.y2010@aut.ac.ir
Signed Behnam Yousefimehr
مدل جدید Claude اومد
Signed Behnam Yousefimehr
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Behnam Yousefimehr
نسخه Claude Opus 4.8 منتشر شد. - سه تغییر مشخص نسبت به نسخه 4.7: قضاوت دقیقتر درباره وضعیت، صداقت بیشتر در بیان محدودیتهای خود و حفظ طولانیتر زمینه هنگام کار مستقل بدون راهنمایی. - در بنچمارکها: کدنویسی عاملی (SWE-Bench Pro) 69.2٪ در مقابل 64.3٪ در نسخه 4.7 و 58.6٪ در GPT-5.5. استفاده از کامپیوتر (OSWorld) 83.4٪. کار دانش (GDPval-AA) 1890 در مقابل 1753 نسخه قبلی. در کدنویسی ترمینالی GPT-5.5 فعلاً با 78.2٪ در مق…
Signed Behnam Yousefimehr
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ComputerScienceBY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 397,392 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Computer Science” (@ComputerScienceBY), 801 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ComputerScienceBY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.