4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 160–167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 03:27
161
-4
8 Aug 2026, 16:15
165
no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:19
165
-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:23
166
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 3 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
279 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
144
51.6%
❤
99
35.5%
👎
14
5.02%
👏
11
3.94%
😁
9
3.23%
😱
2
0.717%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2023 to 27 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BÁN CODE HỖ TRỢ NỔ HŨ 100% 🔥
AN TOÀN - UY TÍN - XANH CHÍN
Hom nay là thứ 5 em với anh cùng đi nhảy... thứ 5 máu chảy về tim mua code nổ hũ hom nay qua TO lắm nhé♥️
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
GIÁ CODE 300K NHÉ CÁC BẠN
(BAO NỔ HŨ VÒNG 100 ĐỒNG)
🏧HỖ TRỢ MOMO BANKING THẺ CÀO
👉MUA CODE NỔ HŨ LIÊN HỆ ZALO HỖ TRỢ 24/7
𝐓𝐞𝐋𝐞 @BANCODENOHU 𝐓𝐔𝐀𝐍 𝐀𝐍𝐇
𝐙𝐀𝐋𝐎 0889999771 𝐇𝐎𝐀𝐍𝐆 𝐋𝐎𝐍𝐆
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Các bạn share mạnh tay vào 10 hoặc 15 nhóm game nh…
Đã gửi code tri ân đủ rồi nhé. Chúc tất cả các bạn nổ hũ cực to 🎉
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
BÁN CODE NỔ HŨ 100%
BẠN MUỐN CẢM GIÁC NỔ HŨ
THÌ IBOX LIÊN ZALO NGÔ HOÀNG LONG NHÉ
GIÁ CODE NỔ HŨ 300K💲CÁC BẠN MUA CODE NẠP VÀO ĐƯỢC 250K GAME BAO NỔ HŨ VÒNG 100💥
🏦HỖ TRỢ THANH TOÁN🏦
THẺ CÀO - MOMO - BANKING
❌KHÔNG HỖ TRỢ SMS❌
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
CÁC BẠN MUA CODE THÌ XEM BẢNG
TIN CHÒN CÁCH THANH TOÁN RỒI
IBOX CHO HOÀNG LONG XUẤT CODE NHÉ
𝐙𝐀𝐋𝐎 088…
BÁN CODE HỖTRỢ NỔHŨ 100%⭐️
GIÁ CODE 300K BAO NỔ HŨ VÒNG (100 ĐỒNG)
Đã gửi quà xông cho những bạn mua code nổ hũ hom nay rồi nhé. còn bạn nào mua nữa thì tặng trực tiếp 100K🎁
CHÚC CÁC BẠN MAY MẮN NỔ HŨ
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Những bạn tham gia even mời bạn bè chia sẻ nhóm chốt lộc đủ rồi nhé bạn nào làm đúng đủ yêu cầu mời bạn chia sẻ nhóm chia sẻ bài even là dc bot gửi code 20K 50K mạnh tay lên lộc to🎁
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
MUA CODE…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Codenohu99vin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 942,127 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MUA LÀ NỔ - 99VIN” (@Codenohu99vin), 161 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Codenohu99vin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
