Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Coconut gifts

Channel

Coconut gifts

@Coconat_gifts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

288subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003093088456
TypeChannel
Username@Coconat_gifts
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Coconat_gifts

Growth

288291289.57 August 2026 — 291 subscribers8 August 2026 — 291 subscribers15 August 2026 — 288 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 288–291 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 10:44288-3
8 Aug 2026, 08:16291no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:23291first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5258107286856955568827.6%
custom 5334581434420073897724.1%
custom 5438249300561792814620.7%
custom 5199528206431981121517.2%
custom 5251324597193709038310.3%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 12 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Apr 2026, 20:47 UTC262 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

😁😆😁сделать пост о заморозке канала

custom 53345814344200738974custom 52581072868569555683custom 51995282064319811212custom 54382493005617928141

11 Apr 2026, 10:36 UTC280 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://vk.ru/audio664556912_456239611_2b933d1b0195ceff8e

custom 52581072868569555681

11 Apr 2026, 10:36 UTC282 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ахаха, кому кому, а этому треку ПОЕБАТЬ на ебаный ркн

custom 52581072868569555681

10 Apr 2026, 20:56 UTC232 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я с нынешнего положения в РФ просто В АХУЕ. Слов на километровый посто , но тут минимум. Это какой то пиздец из этой гниющей страны надо съебывать . "Чем ближе к раз империи, тем строже её законы" 'Цицерон'

custom 51995282064319811211

9 Apr 2026, 14:09 UTC193 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚀 The TON blockchain just got upgraded and is now 10× faster. ⚡️ Block rate increased 6×. ⏱ Transactions are now instant, subsecond. 🪙 This was step 1 of 7 to Make TON Great Again (MTONGA). Next step: cut the already low transaction fees by 6×. ✂️

custom 54382493005617928141

9 Apr 2026, 04:34 UTC180 viewsread 8 August 2026

📱Накиньте ТТ мод у кого есть в комы

1 Apr 2026, 15:54 UTC225 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. ((♟️)GARTSFOS " 🌑 (@well12z) 2. Artem (@artem58fshm) ✔️Проверить результаты

custom 51995282064319811212

1 Apr 2026, 11:33 UTC220 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кто не забрал мишку, не расстраивайтесь. 😢 Держите 2 сердечка💝💝

custom 53345814344200738971

1 Apr 2026, 11:31 UTC199 viewsread 8 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победитель: 1. матвей (@reassociation) ✔️Проверить результаты

31 Mar 2026, 21:39 UTC175 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Реал простите что ничего не делаю, были бы деньги каждый день бы делал

custom 52581072868569555683

31 Mar 2026, 21:28 UTC170 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

С первым апреля ребят🎁

custom 52513245971937090383custom 54382493005617928143custom 53345814344200738972

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Coconat_gifts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 646,106 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Coconut gifts” (@Coconat_gifts), 288 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Coconat_gifts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.