Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Coalichain ZOOZ | Official Announcement

Channel

Coalichain ZOOZ | Official Announcement

@Coalichain_Zooz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

201subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001612056395
TypeChannel
Username@Coalichain_Zooz
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Coalichain_Zooz

Growth

2012072047 August 2026 — 207 subscribers8 August 2026 — 207 subscribers15 August 2026 — 205 subscribers21 August 2026 — 203 subscribers27 August 2026 — 201 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 200–208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 23:59201-2
21 Aug 2026, 19:38203-2
15 Aug 2026, 14:37205-2
8 Aug 2026, 11:05207no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:57207first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 March 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

140 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4431.4%
🥰3726.4%
2820.0%
👏1712.1%
👍1410.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2023 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTCviews —

Coalichain ZOOZ | Official Announcement pinned «🔥 Coalichain is Back! 🔥 The team is active again, development is moving forward, and the community is growing every day! 🌍 ✅ ZooZ is available on PancakeSwap. ✅ A governance-focused blockchain ecosystem. ✅ Long-term vision with community participation. If…»

28 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC17 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔥 Coalichain is Back! 🔥 The team is active again, development is moving forward, and the community is growing every day! 🌍 ✅ ZooZ is available on PancakeSwap. ✅ A governance-focused blockchain ecosystem. ✅ Long-term vision with community participation. If you've been looking for an early-stage project to follow, now is a great time to learn more about ZooZ. #ZooZ #Coalichain #Crypto #BSC #DeFi

4🔥4👍1

26 Jul 2026, 15:14 UTCviews —

Coalichain ZOOZ | Official Announcement pinned «We are all stronger together. I want to let you know that we are preparing all the great utilities for the development of the project. The team is already making great preparations. Stay with the project and enjoy all the great events. We are doing enough…»

26 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC17 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

We are all stronger together. I want to let you know that we are preparing all the great utilities for the development of the project. The team is already making great preparations. Stay with the project and enjoy all the great events. We are doing enough marketing. New listings. New events. Great giveaways. New partnerships. We are preparing a lot more, to be announced very soon. #COALICHAIN_ZOOZ_TOKEN #Coalichai

🔥42

27 Feb 2024, 20:35 UTC267 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Hey friends, actually in Dubai at AIBC exhibition, to get better and faster with ZooZ and Coalichain targets. Good news coming soon. Keep it up and get your ZooZ if you still didn’t. https://cutt.ly/ZoozMarket3

🥰4👏3

28 Aug 2023, 11:11 UTC325 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#COALICHAIN_ZOOZ_TOKEN We are pleased to announce. Already we have applied for CG list. The list is already being prepared. We will be able to see the CG list soon. We are ready to work hard to improve the ZOOZ project. #COALICHAIN_ZOOZ_TOKEN #Coalichain #BSC #ZooZ_Token #Coingecko #CG

👏6🥰6

19 May 2023, 08:59 UTC470 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#Coalichain_Zooz_Token Coalichain Token was added to 👉 http://icoholder.com 👍Available Here: 👇 👉 https://icoholder.com/en/ico-1047142 #Coalichain #Crypto #Blockchain #ZooZ_Token #ZOOZ

🔥87👍1

27 Apr 2023, 16:32 UTC503 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ZooZ aims to provide a secure and transparent platform, ensuring that all transactions are accurately and efficiently executed through smart contracts. With ZooZ, users can participate in a decentralized democratic decision-making process and be financially rewarded for their involvement. ZooZ aims to provide a secure and transparent platform, ensuring that all transactions are accurately and efficiently executed th

🔥7🥰4👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Coalichain_Zooz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Apr 2023, 18:22 UTCAnonymous Poll220 voters

Which Centralized Exchange would you suggest for the ZOOZ to be listed first?

  1. BKEX2%
  2. Bitmart84%
  3. Probit Global0%
  4. Crypto.com3%
  5. CoinW0%
  6. P2B1%
  7. Digifinex1%
  8. Latoken1%
  9. CoinTiger9%
  10. Other (Add exchange name in comment)1%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2023 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Coalichain ZOOZ | Official Announcement” (@Coalichain_Zooz), 201 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Coalichain_Zooz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.