Channel
@ClipperCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
696subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001530025840 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ClipperCalls |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ClipperCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 696 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 696 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 May 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 537 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Opened a position on $Jimothy. Keep seeing it everywhere even though I willfully ignored it. I think when something goes this viral it becomes harder to ignore. At over 12m I'll dca when the opportunity presents itself but I think this will run higher. Ge87EtsjwRQbHaqQmKRno69RFTwh9bfSsm99XNxTpump
ENGNF2NEz9EmgW2pGr1vSJHbuSDG183pQ6VnKnGcpump $Papoi Top gamble again 190k. Will watch for entry possible viral tiktok minion meme on the cards.
https://x.com/i/status/2081862458398896359
https://x.com/i/status/2081160249398972605 $Cog 7rSpKgASuXN5hfw3jsKNZN6ysNCR1Eixb2PD2Nd9pump 200k gamble
$Bob https://x.com/i/status/2075140091593240806
I actually find it odd that kenzo got no traction given that every influencer on X is jumping on the 'cat' meta which is being quite clearly forced. Theres nothing going for cat narratives other than Kenzo - from the big cat family. I feel like if one of those CT influencers made the connection Kenzo could actually be the cat token with narrative. Albeit a tiger (but still a cat!) People have missed what's under thei…
Kenzo never got the attention it deserved and has slowly bled out. Its still circulating as a news story but no major outlets or influencers have made the story viral. Potential was there but maybe it wasn't meant to be for this one.
AwahLRVuYoT7xUcG8bKUsBssRhFDg3uJmZKR8Bx6pump $Kenzo Whilst other tokens are on the back burner (hodl, Bob, yee, kekius etc) and are in accumulation phases ive gone for the gamble on $Kenzo too. Narrative is the animal (white tiger) was killed by authorities who were meant to sedate it. Was attempted to be covered up and its doing the rounds particularly in the Spanish speaking communities. Hasn't gone world wide as…
https://x.com/i/status/2071365313006797094 $Bob just chilling at 35k
$Duck https://x.com/i/status/2067963318413746336
$DUCK has a similar situation going on like $Bob where the creator is backing it. With $Duck though it's the original art creator not the song creator. But either way it's significant in the memecoin world. Sitting around 90k hes actively making more art for the project and could be another with huge potential. 90k 236ziZWiNPWeNk8aNB7abJpv4A6vHNP2XpxHH9VUpump
Bitcoin Bob Buy! 🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸🐻🧸 🔀 1764.21 USDC ($1764.21) 🔀 13 929 987.691 BOB 👤 ARu4n5...5SZn | Txn ⬆️ New Holder! 💸 Market Cap $126 641 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ClipperCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 713,979 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Clipper Calls” (@ClipperCalls), 696 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ClipperCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.