Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Cleve Backster 🏆 Mente en Todo

@CleveBackster

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

814subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002090234491
TypeChannel
Username@CleveBackster
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CleveBackster

Growth

8147 Aug 2026, 00:47 — 814 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:18 — 814 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:477 Aug 2026, 14:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 813–815 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 14:18814no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:47814first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 17 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.5%
avg views ÷ 814 subscribers
Avg views / post
298
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held18 (17 October 20241 August 2026)
Views total595
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

185 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12265.9%
🏆2413.0%
👏2211.9%
👌115.95%
42.16%
💯21.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2024 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC190 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Cleve Backster demostró que existe Mente en Todo https://surfeandomatrix.info/gnosis/CleveBackster.php @CleveBackster

🏆321

Signed Luis

17 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC405 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Cleve Backster: Loosh, la moneda de intercambio en nuestro Holojuego Matrix @CleveBackster

👏2

Signed Luis

10 Mar 2026, 21:16 UTC≈1,210 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

"una breve asociación con las plantas —tan solo unas horas— es suficiente para que se sintonicen contigo" En un artículo publicado por The Sun en julio de 1997, titulado "Las plantas responden, una entrevista con Cleve Backster", Backster afirma: "Es muy difícil eliminar la conexión entre el experimentador y las plantas que se están probando. Incluso una breve asociación con las plantas —tan solo unas horas— es sufi

8

Signed Luis

10 Mar 2026, 20:37 UTC≈1,420 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

La Vida Secreta de las Plantas Enlace alternativo En el documental de 1978, La vida secreta de las plantas, se muestran los experimentos de Cleve Backster, y los de otros científicos que también los replicaron: En un experimento particular representado en la película, un grupo de artemias se va a arrojar a una olla de agua hirviendo. Hay un temporizador programado para liberar las artemias a intervalos aleatorios,

8

Signed Luis

21 Feb 2026, 23:48 UTC≈1,250 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"Antes era bastante incrédulo", afirma Cleve Backster en una entrevista, unos años después de empezar a trabajar con plantas. "Era agnóstico y no me molestaba en ser ateo. Pero ahora, si me preguntaran, tendría que reflexionar sobre la nueva perspectiva que he adquirido sobre lo que realmente implican los niveles superiores de espiritualidad".

11

Signed Luis

3 Nov 2025, 13:25 UTC≈1,900 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

VISUALIZACIÓN vs CONCEPTUALIZACIÓN ⤵️Revisando el libro LA VIDA SECRETA DE TUS CÉLULAS (la revolución científica de Cleve Backster) pág. 26 a 28 tomo 2 #LaVidaSecretaDeTusCélulas@CleveBackster La conceptualización mental es, por lo tanto, una forma menos limitante de describir lo que debe hacerse mentalmente en el extremo emisor. La concepción enviada es percepción recibida. La mayoría de las técnicas del Método Si

13🏆4

Signed Luis

1 Nov 2025, 14:42 UTC≈1,420 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Cleve Backster entrevistado acerca de la Percepcion Primaria Acabo de subtitular esta entrevista de 1995. Cleve Backster fue invitado a participar en los Cursos del Método de Control Mental José Silva. La conexión entre dos individuos es independiente del espacio y del tiempo. Un error común cometido por todos los científicos es no tener en cuenta que el Experimentador afecta al experimiento. Por eso es tan import

🏆6

Signed Luis

9 Sept 2025, 09:34 UTC≈4,360 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/kYZ_wzC0Ai4

👏61

Signed Luis

9 May 2025, 21:08 UTC≈3,680 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

IMAGINA LA DESTRUCCIÓN DE TUS TEJIDOS ENFERMOS. Imagina la destrucción de las células cancerígenas ⤵️Revisando el libro LA VIDA SECRETA DE TUS CÉLULAS (la revolución científica de Cleve Backster) pág. 97-98 Los diez pasos anteriores comprenden tanto el Método Simonton como el Método Silva. El Dr. Carl Simonton se formó en el Método Silva, aunque con otro nombre, mientras era oncólogo en la Base Aérea de Travis. Dec

23👌11🏆5💯2

Signed Luis

9 Mar 2025, 16:18 UTC≈2,520 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Cleve Backster aparece en la película The Secret Life of Plants ✨"A partir del 2 de febrero de 1966 mi vida no ha sido simplemente la misma". #CleveBackster 🧩 Uno de los científicos más importantes para poder componer mi Puzzle de la Realidad, tal y como he publicado en SurfeandoMatrix.info

3🏆2

Signed Luis

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @CleveBackster. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 469,869 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cleve Backster 🏆 Mente en Todo” (@CleveBackster), 814 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CleveBackster.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.