Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Claus Haus

@ClausHaus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

327subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002371984357
TypeChannel
Username@ClausHaus
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ClausHaus

Growth

3277 Aug 2026, 05:32 — 327 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:31 — 327 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:327 Aug 2026, 23:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 326–328 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 23:31327no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:32327first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.4%
avg views ÷ 327 subscribers
Avg views / post
155
1 post measured
Reaction rate
11.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (18 November 20251 August 2026)
Views total155
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

282 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 542060033504971494311641.1%
custom 53438672954479243416021.3%
custom 53192639489549629304817.0%
custom 54201094933022277703211.3%
👍113.90%
62.13%
🎅31.06%
🔥31.06%
🥰20.709%
💘10.355%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 282reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 20 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ClausHaus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 November 2025 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC155 views18 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Где-то далеко, на Reddit’е Бали😍 Со временем у меня сложилось ощущение, что где-то там... За горами, за лесами, после волшебной поляны у острова Бали: Есть команда реддитологов, которые знают то - о чем я никогда не догадывался за 4 года ведения reddit. Самая популярная сказка, которую порой я слышу🍴 Периодически, не очень часто, но все же иногда до меня доходят легенды про команду реддитологов у которых в первый

custom 542060033504971494310custom 53192639489549629304custom 53438672954479243414

10 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC529 views12 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Reddit снова крутит и снова не в твою сторону! Всем привет, с вами Claus и у меня с эльфами для вас на разбор сегодня интересная тема , сегодня на повестке у нас - Июньская волна банов Запасаемся терпением, нервами и готовимся узнать "улучшения", которые Reddit ввел для нас в прошлом месяце. Сразу спойлер: Reddit не объявлял отдельную войну NSFW и не запускал один большой банхаммер. Всё немного сложнее. Хронология

custom 542060033504971494310custom 53438672954479243412

10 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC664 views15 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Не хочу делать никаких прогнозов Не хочу делать никаких прогнозов и рассказывать, что будет с Reddit через полгода. Сейчас важнее смотреть на то, что уже происходит. На рынке уже создался дефицит нормальных Reddit-аккаунтов. Новые партии фармятся хуже и чаще уходят в блокировку, а старые аккаунты, которые раньше считались надёжными, тоже начали сыпаться заметно чаще. Из-за этого фарм становится дольше и дороже, а хо

custom 54206003350497149438custom 53438672954479243414custom 53192639489549629303

17 Jun 2026, 12:31 UTC394 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пост выше не является рекламой. Стеди - мой хороший товарищ и человек, которого я спокойно могу рекомендовать. Он всегда готов прийти на помощь, подсказать по делу и просто нормально пообщаться без лишнего пафоса. Плюс с ним можно очень вайбово залететь в R.E.P.O., что тоже отдельный аргумент. Поэтому я искренне рекомендую не только сотрудничать со Стеди, но и в первую очередь дружить с ним. Такие люди в комьюнити

custom 542060033504971494313custom 53438672954479243415custom 53192639489549629304

16 Jun 2026, 17:11 UTC392 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Несколько слов о статистике и FYP — честное мнение Привет-привет, друг, это Стеди! Настало время поговорить о том, как на самом деле читать статистику на сайте. Я веду FYP-трафик для моделей уже более года и постоянно вижу одну и ту же картину: человек смотрит на зелёную линию, радуется росту, а потом впадает в панику, когда она проседает. Давай разберём по полочкам, что реально важно Вот свежие графики с одного из

custom 54206003350497149438custom 53438672954479243416custom 53192639489549629304custom 54201094933022277701

25 May 2026, 20:48 UTC440 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Все реддитологи в последние дни такие типа:

custom 53192639489549629309custom 54201094933022277704custom 54206003350497149434

17 May 2026, 13:03 UTC546 views16 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не могу не подчеркнуть, что наш Claus на картинке очень подозрительно похож на пулеметчика из Team Fortes 2. Chubby ниша на Reddit от Claus Owner Доброго времени суток, мои любимые. Не так давно проводил обучение и разбирали кейс клиента с моделью Chubby типажа, тут кстати можете ознакомиться с отзывом 😎. Вспомнил похожие кейсы из своей практики, много полезных сабреддитов и заметил, что ниша выросла и стала еще бо

custom 54206003350497149438custom 53192639489549629304custom 53438672954479243414

15 Apr 2026, 09:04 UTC672 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мы не возьмем твой кейс в работу! Да, ты всё правильно прочитал. Да! Мы сейчас расширили штат опытными специалистами, сделали много хороших кейсов, закупились рекламой и готовы приводить от 10+ фанов в сутки на вашу страницу. Сотрудничаем только с теми, кто готов работать на результат: усиливать контент, держать дедлайны и играть в долгое, растущее партнерство Готов увидеть, как мы ведем сейчас Reddit? Тогда пиши

custom 54206003350497149435custom 53192639489549629302custom 53438672954479243411

7 Apr 2026, 14:59 UTC582 views13 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пост, который вдохновляет меня заниматься Claus Haus Немного необычный для нас формат поста, скорее просто личные мысли и рассуждения, многие из вас знают, что я был во многих командах по Reddit, черпал опыт с нуля и постоянно совершенствовался в своем мастерстве, но этот пост не обо мне😘 Этот пост о действительно росте нашего проекта: Я давно мечтал о своей собственной команде, своих учениках и близких людях с ко

custom 54206003350497149437custom 53192639489549629303custom 53438672954479243413

23 Mar 2026, 13:18 UTC532 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня стало известно о смерти Леонида Радвинского, владельца OnlyFans Компания подтвердила, что он скончался сегодня в возрасте 43 лет после долгой борьбы с онкологией Для нашей сферы это не просто новость из разряда кто-то умер: Это смерть человека, который с 2018 года контролировал Fenix International, материнскую компанию OnlyFans, и при котором платформа стала одной из главных точек монетизации для создателе

custom 54201094933022277707

14 Mar 2026, 23:15 UTC513 views13 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Набор тестируемых гипотез от Claus Haus 1). NSFW стали меньше пихать случайным людям, но больше показывать тем, кто реально это смотрит Раньше часть показов могла уходить людям, которым NSFW вообще неинтересен. После изменений таких лишних показов стало меньше. Зато тем, у кого включен 18+ контент и кто реально взаимодействует с NSFW, его могли начать показывать чаще. Итог: общий охват может падать, но полезный охв

custom 53438672954479243419custom 53192639489549629302custom 54206003350497149432

14 Mar 2026, 23:15 UTC400 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Reddit работает и вот почему!👌 Всем привет, мои дорогие. Я недавно посовещался со своими эльфами и пришел к выводу, что надо вам рассказать, что происходит на реддит после очередного изменения алгоритмов в начале этого года. Запасайтесь кофе с печеньками и приятного ознакомления! Для тех, кто забыл основные изменения реддит от января оставляю ссылку на пост: Reddit снова крутит и снова не в твою сторону Почему NSF

custom 54206003350497149435

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ClausHaus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 633,858 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Claus Haus” (@ClausHaus), 327 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ClausHaus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.