Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for شغف الفصحى وجمالها

Channel

شغف الفصحى وجمالها

@Classical_Arabic0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,128subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001314772464
TypeChannel
Username@Classical_Arabic0
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Classical_Arabic0

Growth

7,1167,1287,1227 August 2026 — 7,116 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,118 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,124 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,128 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,114–7,130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:057,128+4
11 Aug 2026, 15:137,124+6
8 Aug 2026, 15:067,118+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:167,116first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 7,128 subscribers
Avg views / post
784
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held21 (17 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total9,406
Reactions total96
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
51s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

160 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7848.8%
👍5433.8%
😢159.38%
🥰42.50%
👏31.88%
😁31.88%
👌21.25%
💔10.625%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC228 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ما أسرع خطى الأيام! بين شغف اللقاء وحرقة الوادع انتهت زيارة أهلي وصنعاء. حَـلَّ الفِـراقُ.. فَأهْـدانِي النّـوى كَفَنِي كَـأنَّمَــا الـرّوحُ مِنّـي فَــارَقَتْ بَـدَنِـي قَد عُدتُ وَحدِي، وَرُوحِي فِيكَ عَالِقَةٌ مِثْـلَ الفَـراشَـةِ حَولَ الضّوْءِ، يَا وَطَنِي تَـرَكْـتُهــا بَيْـنَ أَهْلِـي وَالـدّيـارِ عَسَى أَعُــودُ يَـومًا لَهــا لَـوْ مَسَّـنِـي حَـزَنِـي ودّعتُـهُــم وَأَنـا أَشتَــاقُ رُؤيَـتَــهُـمْ كَأنّ

😢8👍1

23 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC950 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @edmanalhatef

💣ما بدأ بتسلية انتهى بإدمان..! 📲بكل هدوء! الريلز تسرقك!!؟ تبدو ثواني قصيرة، لكنها ليست مجرد مقاطع قصيرة؛ بل شِباك ناعمة تُغرقك دون أن تشعر؛ تشوش عقلك، تبلّد تفكيرك، وتسرق أيامك في اللاشيء؛ ثم تُضعف روحك ، لأن كثيرًا منها محرم، مثقل بالموسيقى، مليء بالعُري، مشحون بالسطحية والتفاهة. ومع الوقت، تنسى غض البصر ، وتستثقل الصلاة ، وتستطيب المعصية، ثم ماذا؟ تُحرم لذة الأنس بالله. لا أحد يقول لك لا ترفّه عن نفسك، لكن اسأل

12👏2

23 Jul 2026, 05:59 UTC815 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

الحمدُ لله مقُسّم القسم، وباري النّسم، ومُديم النّعم، ومُزيل النّقم، حمدًا يُوازي بواطن نِعمه، ويُجازى ظواهِر كرمه، وإن كانٕ كرمه لا يُوازى، ونعمه لا تُجازى، بأقصى المحامِد، وأبعد جُهد الجاهِد. ‏الجاحِظ #شغف_الفصحى_وجمالها

12

23 Jul 2026, 05:49 UTC796 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

وضُرب بعض النحويين، فكان المطوف يقول: هيذا جزا، فقال: والله لو خُيِّرتُ بين طريحةٍ أخرى وبين ألا أسمع صوتَ هذا الفاحش اللَّحِن لاخترت ذلك، ثم التفت للمطوف، وقال له: يا محرومُ! بيِّن الإعراب، وقل: هذا جزاءٌ؛ لأنه مبتدأ وخبرٌ، فقال له المطوف: اسكتْ واتخل رأسَك، فقال له: بالدال قلها واقطع الهمزة؛ لأنه فعل أمرٍ، فقال له: والله ما ضربت أبرد منك. فلما دخل داره، وكانت له قطة، فجاءت تلعق الدم وتصيح: ميو، فقال لها: قولي: مئو

5😁3

21 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTC792 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

قوله تعالى: ﴿وَإِذَا العشار عُطِّلَتْ﴾ . العشار: جمع عشراء، وهي: الناقة التي مر لحملها عشرة أشهر، ثم هو اسمها إلى أن تضع في تمام السَّنة وكذلك يقال في جمع نفساء. قال القرطبي: وهو اسمها بعد ما تضع أيضًا، ومن عادة العرب أن يسمُّوا الشيء باسمه المتقدم، وإن كان قد جاوز ذلك، يقول الرجل لفرسه وقد قرح: قربوا مهري يسميه بمتقدم اسمه، وإنَّما خصَّ العشار بالذكر؛ لأنَّها أعزُّ ما يكون عند العرب، وهذا على وجه المثل؛ لأن في ا

👍7

20 Jul 2026, 19:43 UTC825 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

البَتَّة: تقول لا أفعلُه الْبَتَّةَ كأنه قَطع فِعْلَه، والبَتُّ: القَطْع ومَذْهبُ سيبويه وأصحابِه: لا يُستعملَ إلاَّ بالأَلِفِ واللاَّم لا غَيْر، وأجازَ الفَرَّاء الكُوفي وحدَه تنكيرَه فأجَاز«لا أفْعَلُه بَتَّةً» وإعرابُ «الْبَتَّة» مصدرٌ مؤكِّد #شغف_الفصحى_وجمالها

5👍3

19 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC919 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

من الخطأ قول: جاء محمدٌ وخالد سويًّا. 🚫❌️ والصواب: جاء محمدٌ وخالد معًا أو جميعًا.✅️✅️ ومن استعمالات السويِّ في القرآن (من تفسير أبي السعود): ﴿فَتَمَثَّلَ لَها بَشَرًا سَوِيًّا﴾ سَوِيَّ الخَلْقِ كامِلَ البُنِّيَّةِ، لَمْ يَفْقِدْ مِن حِسانِ نُعُوتِ الآدَمِيَّةِ شَيْئًا. #شغف_الفصحى_وجمالها

👍13👏1

19 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC750 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#منقول لفظ (عامة): ‏عند #سيبويه بمعنى (جميع). ‏لذلك إن قلت: (جاء القوم عامتهم)، فـ(عامتهم) عنده توكيد. ‏وعند #المبرد هي بمعنى أكثرهم لا جميعهم. ‏ولذلك تعرب عنده بدل بعض من كل. #شغف_الفصحى_وجمالها

👍8👌1

18 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC820 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

(وجف): ﴿فَمَا أَوْجَفْتُمْ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ خَيْلٍ وَلَا رِكَابٍ﴾ [الحشر: ٦] «وَجَفَ البعيرُ والفرس - كوعد: أسرع في السير، والقلبُ: خاف/ خَفَق من الخوف. وأوجف الذِكْرَ بلسانه: حَرَّكه». ° المعنى المحوري خفة حركة الشيء ومباعدته مقره. (بسبب خفة ما يحتويه) كارتفاع اللسان عن مَقَرّه بالذكْر بخفَّة، وارتفاع الفرس وغيره عن الأرض عند الإسراع. ﴿فَمَا أَوْجَفْتُمْ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ خَيْلٍ وَلَا رِكَابٍ﴾ أي ما أعملتم وما أجهدتم

👍62

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Classical_Arabic0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بعضً من اللُطف 🤎🥥.
@pink_letters_0 · 203,340
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شغف الفصحى وجمالها” (@Classical_Arabic0), 7,128 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Classical_Arabic0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.