Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Class 11 notes pdf

@Class_11_notes_pdf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

738subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001947183430
TypeChannel
Username@Class_11_notes_pdf
Created13 July 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Class_11_notes_pdf

Growth

7386 Aug 2026, 23:01 — 738 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:16 — 738 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:017 Aug 2026, 03:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 737–739 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 03:16738no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:01738first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 13 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

102 reactions across 1 post, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5553.9%
2221.6%
🥰54.90%
👎43.92%
🥱43.92%
👏32.94%
😁32.94%
😱32.94%
🤩21.96%
🔥10.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2023 to 1 October 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2023, 04:59 UTC≈12,700 views102 reactionsread 6 August 2026

𝗪𝗛𝗜𝗖𝗛 𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗝𝗘𝗖𝗧 𝗦𝗧𝗨𝗗𝗬 𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗔𝗟𝗦 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗪𝗔𝗡𝗧 ? ‼️‼️ 𝐂𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐁𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐰 ‼️‼️ 👉 ᴘʜʏꜱɪᴄꜱ 👉 ʙɪᴏʟᴏɢʏ 👉 ᴄʜᴇᴍɪꜱᴛʀʏ 👉 ᴍᴀᴛʜᴇᴍᴀᴛɪᴄꜱ 👉 ʜɪɴᴅɪ 👉 ᴇɴɢʟɪꜱʜ 👉 ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ꜱᴄɪᴇɴᴄᴇ 👉 ɪɴꜰᴏʀᴍᴀᴛɪᴄꜱ ᴘʀᴀᴄᴛɪᴄᴇ 👉 ᴘᴏʟɪᴛɪᴄᴀʟ ꜱᴄɪᴇɴᴄᴇ 👉 ʜɪꜱᴛᴏʀʏ 👉 ɢᴇᴏɢʀᴀᴘʜʏ 👉 ᴘꜱʏᴄʜᴏʟᴏɢʏ 👉 ꜱᴏᴄɪᴏʟᴏɢʏ 👉 ʜᴏᴍᴇ ꜱᴄɪᴇɴᴄᴇ 👉 ᴘʜʏꜱɪᴄᴀʟ ᴇᴅᴜᴄᴀᴛɪᴏɴ 👉 ʙᴜꜱɪɴᴇꜱꜱ ꜱᴛᴜᴅɪᴇꜱ 👉 ᴀᴄᴄᴏᴜɴᴛᴀɴᴄʏ 👉 ᴇᴄᴏɴᴏᴍɪᴄꜱ 👉 ᴀʟʟ ꜱᴜʙᴊᴇᴄᴛꜱ 👉 ʙᴏᴏᴋꜱ ᴘᴅꜰ 👉 ꜱᴀᴍᴘʟᴇ ᴘᴀᴘᴇʀꜱ 👉 ᴘʀᴇᴍɪᴜᴍ ᴄᴏɴᴛᴇɴᴛ 👉 Qᴜɪᴢᴢᴇꜱ & ᴘᴏʟʟꜱ ❣ ᶜˡⁱᶜᵏ ᵒⁿ

👍5522🥰5👎4🥱4👏3😁3😱3

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @Class_11_notes_pdf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 768,811 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Class 11 notes pdf” (@Class_11_notes_pdf), 738 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Class_11_notes_pdf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.