Merujuk pada perkembangan masalah kemarin, pihak-pihak yang bersangkutan telah berkomunikasi dan mencapai titik temu. Berdasarkan bukti diatas, mereka menyatakan telah saling memaafkan dan tidak ingin masalah ini berlarut-larut atau menyeret pihak lain. Tugas kami di sini hanya menyampaikan fakta secara objektif demi meluruskan simpang siur, tanpa bermaksud membela salah satu pihak. Mohon untuk tidak ada lagi spek…
Channel
Clarification.
@ClarificationAdmins
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003910395935 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ClarificationAdmins |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 2 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ClarificationAdmins |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 7 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 7 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 2
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
86 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 86 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🩶
❤9
hallo. adanya bbc ini ditujukan untuk mengarahkan dan mempermudah pembaca agar lebih memahami bagian kontribusi yang dilakukan oleh setiap pihak. kami berharap klarifikasi ini dapat dibaca secara menyeluruh agar tidak terjadi kesalahpahaman. 1. klarifikasi serta permintaan maaf faye dalam pembuatan channel spill dan salah asumsi terhadap tiny case. 2. klarifikasi serta permintaan maaf kareem dalam pembuatan bot spi…
❤8
Sticker, posted without a caption
Setelah penjelasan dan permintaan maaf lebih lanjut ini, kami berharap tidak akan ada lagi tindakan yang melibatkan pihak-pihak yang tidak bersangkutan dengan kami maupun permasalahan ini, seperti mengirimkan pesan melalui anon maupun bot dorm/cc dengan penggunaan bahasa yang kurang pantas. Dan seluruh pihak dapat menghentikan segala bentuk kegiatan yang berpotensi memperkeruh situasi, sehingga permasalahan ini dapat…
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
hello, i'm shaira aka @jeongianu one of admins in the @blytheeandownfallera. i'm here just want to says sorry bcs of a mistake i made, especially for the victims. for a details, in the first place i just hate tinycase bcs some reason i can't tell here, i don't want to tell any reason after that bcs this text is only for my sorry for the victims and don't wanna make any self defense more. selain itu juga aku gaada an…
❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
halo, aku debora (@jeongianc @leeanjjung @ianjeongo @yyooyuha @yyuharam @seonghyeona) juga bagian dari grup spill blytheean. aku diajak untuk membahas kronologi owner blytheean/cherubeean yang tidak bertanggung jawab dan memberikan info terkait username fg milik mirrabels dan amey ke grup, waktu itu aku sendiri sekadar ingin tau yang sayangnya membiarkan semuanya tetap terpampang di publik. tidak ada yang ku lakukan…
❤4
Sticker, posted without a caption
Namun kami pun menyadari bahwa tindakan yang kami buat, yaitu menyatukan spill owner Blytheean dan spread hate yang mereka terima menjadi satu, itu benar-benar kesalahan kami. Dan kami meminta maaf sebesar-besarnya dan setulus-tulusnya kepada kepada pihak yang terlibat dan segala pihak yang dirugikan oleh kami terutama Blytheean. Klarifikasi ini tidak bertujuan untuk membenarkan tindakan kami atau pun menghindari per…
❤12
Hello this is Moirae & Viccie speaking (@Ieean @leeans @ianjungg @ianjeonng @jeongianr & @lanjung). Kami berdua sekali lagi ingin menjelaskan, bahwasanya kami Viccie & Moirae tidak menyebarkan spread hate ataupun false information, dan meng-upload dari sender-sender anon, yang hanya sekedar memberikan hate personal atau informasi tanpa bukti terhadap member Blytheean. Kami hanya ikut andil dalam permasalahan owner de…
❤18
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ClarificationAdmins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 653,910 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Clarification.” (@ClarificationAdmins), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ClarificationAdmins.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.