Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Clanna Gael

Channel

Clanna Gael

@Clanna_Gael

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

72subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002247100412
TypeChannel
Username@Clanna_Gael
DescriptionGather, Activate, Empower, and Liberate
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Clanna_Gael

Growth

726 August 2026 — 72 subscribers9 August 2026 — 72 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71–73 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 22:3272no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:1872first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
33
Videos
27
Links
31

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2h 27m
Average length
24m 40s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1933.3%
👏1322.8%
🫡1119.3%
😁58.77%
47.02%
💯23.51%
🔥11.75%
🙏11.75%
🤷‍♂11.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2025 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTC17 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IrishDiaspora

https://www.tg4.ie/en/player/categories/top-documentaries/?series=R%C3%A9abhl%C3%B3id%20Mheirice%C3%A1%3A%20Na%20Laochra%20Gael&genre=Faisneis

9 May 2026, 12:22 UTC117 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

The math suggests we have 5-15 years to get into tip top shape.... get ready lads.

🫡3

3 Mar 2026, 22:42 UTC703 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

You hold territory by occupying physical space. Get out there and claim yours.

🫡6👏1

28 Feb 2026, 18:48 UTC109 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IrishHistoricalArchivePhoto

We believe, as every Irish boy whose heart has not been corrupted by foreign influence must believe, that our country ought to be free. We do not see why Ireland should allow England to govern her, either through Englishmen, as at present, or through Irishmen under an appearance of self-government. We believe that England has no business in this country at all—that Ireland, from the centre to the zenith, belongs to

4

10 Jan 2026, 13:47 UTC88 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @brehonacademyPhoto

I was recently asked for information about Brehon Laws in a local context (local to Mayo/Connacht) for a 60k word thesis. Instantly I thought of the MacEgan clan, hereditary Brehons to the chieftains of Connacht, including the famous O'Connor clan who held the high-kingship of Ireland at the time of the Anglo-Norman invasions in 1169. That was my first lead... Next, I conducted some more research and came across th

31 Dec 2025, 12:29 UTC64 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @justinbarrett

Nothing can happen outside a number of already described scenarios, until it does, and afterwards anyone who claims it could have been any other way is a fool. Thus Rome, they said, would rule the world forever, but it didn't and it's obvious now why. Believe it first!

30 Dec 2025, 10:42 UTC58 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @leighstewVideo

They’re organizing. You should too.

🫡1

25 Dec 2025, 12:41 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @TraditionalIrelandPhoto

Nollaig shona dhaoibh!

🙏1

26 Sept 2025, 11:15 UTC121 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @cavanvanguardVideo

Looks like there's some young Australians who have had enough.

6

24 Sept 2025, 11:52 UTC107 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IrishDiasporaVideo

Video, posted without a caption

🤷‍♂1

12 Sept 2025, 13:35 UTC135 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IrishDiasporaVideo

Sure, a Click-bait King is dead. Tragic. But as the media shifts their attention to "political assassination" we shouldn't be distracted by the real threats to the average person just living their life and minding their own business.

👏4💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Clanna_Gael. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 555,862 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Clanna Gael” (@Clanna_Gael), 72 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Clanna_Gael.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.