Channel
@CinemaDocAi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
228subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003393962396 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CinemaDocAi |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CinemaDocAi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 228 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 229 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 229 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (6 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,378 |
| Reactions total | 103 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
154 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 58 | 37.7% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 25.3% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 22.1% | |
| 🤝 | 9 | 5.84% | |
| ✍ | 7 | 4.55% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.649% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
5 августа проводим КиноЧат вместе с КиноПрофи Тема: «Финансирование без мифов: как продюсеру получить деньги, а команде – свой гонорар» Говорить будет Даниил Поповичев, юрист и продюсер, основатель CinemaDoc. Среди проектов с его участием «Холоп. Великолепный век», «Тур с Иванушками», «Киберпапа» и многие другие. Получить финансирование – только половина пути. Дальше начинается то, на чем проекты чаще всего теряют…
🔥6❤5🤝1
Подрядчикам не нужно платить, чтобы работать через CinemaDoc Один из первых вопросов, который возникает перед запуском проекта: «А подрядчикам тоже нужно покупать доступ?» Нет. CinemaDoc устроен так, чтобы для исполнителя всё было максимально просто. Это соответствует нашей задаче — убрать ручную операционную работу вокруг оформления подрядчиков, а не создавать новые сложности. 📌 Вот как это работает. Вы создаёт…
❤7🔥4👍3
📌 От первого договора до закрывающих документов — в одной системе Когда говорят об оформлении подрядчика, многие представляют только договор. Но на практике договор — это только начало. Дальше появляются приложения, акты, документы о передаче прав, согласования, подписи, новые версии файлов и бесконечные напоминания подрядчикам. Если в проекте 20–30 подрядчиков, это уже десятки комплектов документов и сотни дейст…
❤5🔥4🤝2
Как не переплачивать за оформление подрядчиков? У продакшенов редко бывают одинаковые проекты. Сегодня нужно оформить 10 подрядчиков для рекламной съёмки. Через месяц — уже 50 человек для большого проекта. А потом может быть пауза на несколько недель. Модель с ежемесячной подпиской или обязательным большим тарифом подходит далеко не всем. Именно поэтому в CinemaDoc мы сделали оплату по-другому. 📌 Вы платите не з…
🔥6❤3👍3
Передавать документы новому сервису страшно. Мы это понимаем. Когда речь идёт о документах съёмочной группы, доверие не появляется сразу. И это нормально. Перед первым использованием нового сервиса почти у каждого продюсера возникают одни и те же вопросы: ➡️ Что будет с персональными данными команды? ➡️ Не окажется ли в договорах ошибок? ➡️ Будут ли документы и электронные подписи приняты бухгалтерией и юристами? …
❤4🔥3👍2
Live stream finished (49 minutes)
Live stream started
Live stream finished (53 minutes)
Ваши вопросы к эфиру Друзья, если во время эфира у вас появятся вопросы, пишите их в комментарии к этому посту. Я буду поглядывать в них по ходу вебинара и постараюсь ответить прямо в эфире, а на всё, что не успею, отвечу сразу после. Не стесняйтесь, спрашивайте про что угодно по теме, даже если вопрос кажется вам совсем базовым.
👍3
Live stream started
📌 Уже сегодня — бесплатный вебинар о договорах в кино и медиа Большинство договоров выглядят привычно и безопасно. Но именно в них чаще всего скрываются условия, которые потом становятся причиной споров об оплате, передаче прав и ответственности сторон. На бесплатном вебинаре Даниил Поповичев — киноюрист и основатель CinemaDoc — разберёт реальный договор из практики кинопроизводства и покажет: ✅ какие пункты нельз…
❔ Где продакшен теряет деньги, хотя кажется, что всё под контролем Кажется, что основные расходы проекта — техника, локации, транспорт и гонорары. Но есть ещё один ресурс, который почти никогда не попадает в смету. ⏳ Время продюсера. Именно оно часто определяет, насколько спокойно стартует проект. Во время подготовки к съёмкам приходится собирать паспортные данные по чатам, искать реквизиты, сверять версии догов…
❤4🔥4👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @CinemaDocAi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 384,993 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CinemaDocAi | Документы в кино и видеопродакшене” (@CinemaDocAi), 228 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CinemaDocAi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.