Как делать не надо) Но поржать можно и нужно🤣
😁3

Channel
@CinderElla_smm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
71subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002144192341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CinderElla_smm |
| Description | Не откладывай жизнь, но откладывай деньги💵 Здесь о рациональной экономии, накоплениях, кешбеках, инвестициях, выгодных и интересных предложениях🔝 Ну и всё это с жизнью, путешествиями, красивыми кадрами, мемчиками и юмором. Для связи @ccinder_ella |
| Created | Between 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CinderElla_smm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 71 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 71 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 4 | 36.4% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 27.3% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| custom 4920678833423647684 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5389050557560271179 | 1 | 9.09% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как делать не надо) Но поржать можно и нужно🤣
😁3
Недавно тоже прочитала эту книгу, мне понравилась. Думаю купить бумажную версию, чтобы дети прочли и как идея подарка очень нравится 👍
📚 Сегодня на нашей полке книга «Пес по имени Мани», которую я прочитал пару десятилетий назад, и которая стала одним из первых кирпичиков в моем финансовом мировоззрении. Её написал Бодо Шефер — немецкий автор, которого часто называют «финансовым тренером №1 в Европе». Но не дайте этому титулу вас отпугнуть, это не нудный учебник и не инфоцыганский мотивационный манифест, а добрая и лёгкая детская сказка. 😊 Главна…
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥2😁1custom 53890505575602711791
Обязательно попробуйте 😋 #ппрецепт #завтракиЭл #рецептыЭл
🤗2custom 49206788334236476841
Photo, posted without a caption
Кстати рабочий лайфхак, мы уже испытали, белок немного расползается и потом сито мыть, но в целом годный✔️ Вот что у нас получилось ⤵️
♻️Это реально 💯 самый легкий способ сварить яйцо пашот🍳 🔘Вскипятить воду, снизить огонь, положить сито и разбить в сито яйцо. 🔘З минуты и готово #лайфхак ШефСовет|Просто&Вкусно🧑🍳
Отчёт за 3 недели о пополнении 🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃 «52 недели богатства» Внесла на новый айфон: 1168₽, 2482₽ и 2336₽. Итого: 33 726₽ Цель выполнена на 33%
🔥1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @CinderElla_smm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вау эффект, но в рамках бюджета” (@CinderElla_smm), 71 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CinderElla_smm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.