Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Christina Bobb

@ChristinaBobb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

344subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001560458492
TypeChannel
Username@ChristinaBobb
DescriptionHost of Weekly Briefing on OAN. US Marine. Lawyer. Author. Sister. Daughter. Dog Mom
Created14 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ChristinaBobb

Growth

3447 Aug 2026, 19:48 — 344 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:00 — 344 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:488 Aug 2026, 07:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 343–345 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:00344no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:48344first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 1 August 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
51
Videos
31
Links
78

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3h 43m
Average length
24m 51s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2942.6%
1927.9%
🔥1623.5%
👏45.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2023 to 1 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2025, 20:52 UTC235 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

NEW EPISODE: INSIDE THE MAR-A-LAGO RAID with Trump Attorney Christina Bobb | Episode 33 (0:00:00) - Rooting Out Corruption (0:06:46) - Questions Surrounding Mar-a-Lago Raid (0:19:59) - Legal Warfare Against Conservatives (0:29:28) - Challenging Corruption in Recent Politics (0:42:08) - Election Integrity and Obstacles to Reform (0:49:17) - Media Co-Conspirators in Ongoing Corruption (1:02:29) - American Patriots Fi

5👍5🔥3

11 Jul 2024, 20:54 UTC627 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @RoganOHandleyPhoto

🚨The House vote to hold Merrick Garland in Inherent Contempt just FAILED Here are the 4 backstabbing RINOs who supported the Deep State and voted No: 1. Tom McClintock (CA-5) - (202) 225-2511 2. John Duarte (CA-13) - (202) 225-1947 3. David Joyce (OH-14) - (202) 225-5731 4. Mike Turner (OH-11) - (202) 225-5731 @RoganOHandley

🔥13👍4

12 Jun 2024, 21:49 UTC614 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Christina Bobb | Christina Bobb Speaks At ReAwaken America Tour Detroit, Michigan! Join Navarro, Flynn, Eric Trump & Team America At Oct 18-19 Selma, NC ReAwaken! Request Tix Via Text 918-851-0102 @ChristinaBobb

👍164👏4

22 May 2024, 20:40 UTC706 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Bobb On Dems' Latest Lawfare Attacks Against Her: "I think It's An Incredibly Weak Indictment" @ChristinaBobb

7

22 May 2024, 04:45 UTC629 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

WTF?!! They were prepared to kill me?! A few dozen FBI agents v. me and they were ready to kill me?!!! What in the world happened to the United States of America?! FBI was authorized to use 'deadly force' in classified docs search at Trump's Mar-a-Lago, court filings reveal https://nypost.com/2024/05/21/us-news/fbi-was-authorized-to-use-deadly-force-in-mar-a-lago-classified-docs-search @ChristinaBobb

👍4

4 Apr 2024, 20:57 UTC547 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Rebecca Lavrenz - Praying Grandma standing trial for J6!! https://restoringgodlyculture.com/ @christinabobb

3

20 Mar 2024, 22:43 UTC677 viewsread 8 August 2026

This is the same guy who used paid advertising to push videos of himself talking about how he supports Trump and asking Trump supporters not to sign the recall petition. 😂😂 Wisconsin GOP leader calls the Trump supporters trying to oust him 'whack jobs and morons' https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/wisconsin-supreme-court-prepares-weigh-recall-election-question-108277838 @christinabobb

15 Mar 2024, 23:57 UTC578 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Christina Bobb is joining the RNC as senior counsel for election integrity! Republican voters were thrilled by the announcement, while the corporate media trolls were not. 🚨WATCH🚨 @christinabobb

25 Feb 2024, 19:10 UTC636 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Tell me you’re rooting for Jack Smith without telling me you’re rooting for Jack Smith. @ChristinaBobb

24 Feb 2024, 12:11 UTC677 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Trump lawyer Christina Bobb reacts to 'literally insane' remark by Letitia James @ChristinaBobb

12 Feb 2024, 19:31 UTC677 viewsread 8 August 2026

Is GOP Speaker Killing Impeachment Of Suspect WI Elections Chief? https://thefederalist.com/2024/02/12/is-wisconsins-republican-speaker-killing-efforts-to-impeach-suspect-elections-chief/ @ChristinaBobb

21 Jan 2024, 17:12 UTC609 viewsread 8 August 2026

Mike Lindell Thinks Donald Trump's Opponents Are 'Very Scared' https://www.newsweek.com/mike-lindell-said-donald-trumps-opponents-2024-election-are-scared-1862521 @ChristinaBobb

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ChristinaBobb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 622,808 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Christina Bobb” (@ChristinaBobb), 344 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChristinaBobb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.