Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🔒+ Ø2 çhØc𑄝ł𝐚t.te 𝐦eñtoş

@ChocolateMentos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

132subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002569186884
TypeChannel
Username@ChocolateMentos
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ChocolateMentos

Growth

1321341337 August 2026 — 134 subscribers9 August 2026 — 134 subscribers15 August 2026 — 132 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 132–134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:56132-2
9 Aug 2026, 00:00134no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:42134first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

99 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭4141.4%
custom 52422820117034086701616.2%
💔1111.1%
custom 524252792005593864388.08%
custom 526516768481061013588.08%
custom 528293313413070629455.05%
44.04%
👎33.03%
😐33.03%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2026, 20:06 UTCviews —

🔒+ Ø2 çhØc𑄝ł𝐚t.te 𝐦eñtoş pinned «добейте 450 https://t.me/podclyshkafloods»

28 Mar 2026, 01:44 UTC581 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

привяо, я знаю, что мы закрылись и тд тп, но у меня там портфолио появилось с открытыми бесплатными заказами))) подпишитесь и мб закажите что да нибудь, я клево делаю @HarykaPortfolio

3💔1

Signed +Ø2 x𑄝řuką

24 Mar 2026, 18:54 UTC745 viewsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed +Ø2 x𑄝řuką

24 Mar 2026, 18:54 UTC732 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

😭2💔1

Signed +Ø2 x𑄝řuką

24 Mar 2026, 18:11 UTC708 viewsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed +Ø2 x𑄝řuką

24 Mar 2026, 18:11 UTC688 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

💔7custom 52422820117034086704custom 52651676848106101353custom 52425279200559386431

Signed +Ø2 x𑄝řuką

24 Mar 2026, 17:55 UTC608 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

1

Signed +Ø2 x𑄝řuką

24 Mar 2026, 17:55 UTC640 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026

И знаете я хочу попрощаться отдельно не с участниками, а с союзниками. Вы мне были очень дороги, и не смотря, что я многих потерял, я вас се равно люблю и буду любить.

😭16custom 52425279200559386437custom 52422820117034086706custom 52651676848106101353

Signed +Ø2 x𑄝řuką

24 Mar 2026, 17:55 UTC549 viewsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed +Ø2 x𑄝řuką

24 Mar 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,320 views44 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

THE END CHOCOLATE MENTOS ( CRIMINALITY ) ??? И больше всего я боялся конца, но понял, что он не в темноте, а на утреннем пляже на скамейке. Я сам не верю в это, нет. Поверь мне на слово, и перечитывая этот текст раз за разом я хочу лишь загнаться в угол от мыслей, что я пришел к тому, чего боялся за всю жизнь проекта... Я думал долго, я сам не верил, я не хотел правда, и я сам смеялся над этим шутя, что так и будет,

😭23custom 52422820117034086706custom 52829331341307062945👎3😐3💔2custom 52651676848106101352

Signed +Ø2 x𑄝řuką

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ChocolateMentos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,159,066 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔒+ Ø2 çhØc𑄝ł𝐚t.te 𝐦eñtoş” (@ChocolateMentos), 132 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChocolateMentos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.