Channel
@ChoNadoChoto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
35subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002710359422 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ChoNadoChoto |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ChoNadoChoto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 35 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 34 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 34 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (24 June 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 163 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
62 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 24 | 38.7% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 35.5% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 12.9% | |
| 👾 | 4 | 6.45% | |
| ☃ | 3 | 4.84% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Иииии полгода не прошло, а мотылёчек рождён! Тяжело ввнашивал целых 2-3 месяца, но не подумайте, он не недоношенный, а хороший детализированный проработанный мальчик :3 Его имя Чо, что говорит о том, что отныне именно он является моим основным ос и маскотом сего канала, прошу любить и жаловать! P.S. A также заценить футболочку ;3 #диджитл
❤2👍1💘1
Ивентик по хумке летней еды закончен успешно! :3 Мне понравилось над этим работать, я прям доволен результатом, а ещё это в первый раз когда делаю что то типо фона для адопта и надеюсь он не слишком вычурным получился, хех. О и ещё я кое что попробовал тип делать штришки в тенях чутка, не знаю, просто показалось, что может выглядить интереснее :Р #диджитл
🥰2💘1
Привеееет что-то делаю хихих P.S. У меня тут проблемс с электричеством, так что извиняюсь, что пропаду на пару недель, не имею возможности работать :Р #диджитл
💘7
Еееееееее, наконец видео с палитрой вышло! Хехе, кажется мне, что у меня длиннее всех спидпейнт вышел. (≧▽≦) Вообще на удивление я менее опытен по монтированию видео оказался. Но может к следующему разу, буду более оргинальней?.. #диджитл
🥰3💘2
Posted without readable text
Ема, какой портфолио дей я не готов, но не могу не поучаствовать :'] #portfolioday
❤2💘2
Ееее, нас вновь ровно 30! \(≧▽≦)/ #щп
❤3💘2
Sticker, posted without a caption
☃3❤2💘2
Итог ивента по песням! Не скажу, что прям доволен работой, но интересно было поэкспериментировать с без лайном и яркими цветами, для меня это необычно, в комментах кину песню, к которой рисовал арт :3 P.s. И самую малость, возможно, вооозможно, я специально сделал схожесть с цветами би флага :} #диджитл
❤3💘2
Ивентик с палитрой завершился и я наконец могу показать эту красотку! Немного летнего вайба с пипец какими яркими цветами в конце первого месяца лета мне кажется идеальным. Хоть и я довольно много пользовался рефами, по типу позу взял из пинтереста, одежду почти полностью от туда скатал, но мне абсолютно нравится эта реализация :3 Ииии позже выйдет видео с моим спидпейнтом и озвучкой с одной эксперементальной вещью, …
❤5💘2🥰1
Немного спойлерну этого дурачка, хехе, обещал же с ним полноценночку и кардинальную переделку и пока выходит нечто такое яркое, не знаю к лучшему это или к худшему?.. #диджитл
👾4🥰2❤1
Ейп, я закончил! Конечно криво, одно ушко у него уже отвалилось, а краска в некоторых местах смешалась, но для первого раза я считаю очень даже хорошо и мне понравилось над этим работать! Надеюсь я его не разобью случайно.... #щп
❤4💘3
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ChoNadoChoto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 631,946 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чё надо, Чо?” (@ChoNadoChoto), 35 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChoNadoChoto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.