Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Chloe Schnapp News

Channel

Chloe Schnapp News

@ChloeSchnappNews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

89subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003780253698
TypeChannel
Username@ChloeSchnappNews
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 28 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ChloeSchnappNews

Growth

899089.59 August 2026 — 90 subscribers10 August 2026 — 90 subscribers17 August 2026 — 89 subscribers9 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89–90 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:1789-1
10 Aug 2026, 11:4690no change
9 Aug 2026, 16:4690first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 28 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 39s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 9 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4027.8%
💘2718.8%
custom 54134893209064954712618.1%
❤‍🔥96.25%
🍓74.86%
🤩74.86%
custom 541349635606292235153.47%
🆒53.47%
custom 541350339980928821442.78%
🔥32.08%
😍32.08%
🥰32.08%
custom 541345184731683143721.39%
custom 541357538775613591421.39%
👍10.694%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 7 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Apr 2026, 05:48 UTC908 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026

почему у хлои нету нвоостей😔💔

custom 5413489320906495471129💘6👍1

31 Mar 2026, 04:43 UTC≈1,050 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

🔤овый влог Хлои Шнапп в Tik Tok!!📱🍨 Chloe Schnapp News

11💘6custom 54134893209064954714custom 54134963560629223514custom 54135033998092882144🤩1

30 Mar 2026, 16:13 UTC967 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

давайте буст, чтобы красивые реакции были

🆒5

30 Mar 2026, 16:11 UTC892 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

🔤овый Tik Tok Хлои!!🎥🍨 Chloe Schnapp News

custom 541348932090649547194💘3custom 54134518473168314372custom 54135753877561359142❤‍🔥1custom 54134963560629223511

29 Mar 2026, 19:47 UTC652 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

*продолжение поста

🤩6🍓3💘2❤‍🔥1

Signed Алина*ੈ‧₊°

29 Mar 2026, 19:46 UTC546 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔤овый пост Хлои Шнапп в инстаграм 🍨🍨 Я одержима круассанами. Chloe Schnapp News

6💘4🍓2❤‍🔥1custom 54134893209064954711

Signed Алина*ੈ‧₊°

29 Mar 2026, 11:20 UTC392 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔤овые сторис Хлои Шнапп в инстаграм!!🍨🍨 Chloe Schnapp News

4🍓2💘2❤‍🔥1

Signed Алина*ੈ‧₊°

28 Mar 2026, 15:11 UTC374 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔤овый сторис Хлои в инстаграм!!🍨🍨 Chloe Schnapp News

6🔥3💘2😍2❤‍🔥1

Signed Алина*ੈ‧₊°

28 Mar 2026, 14:20 UTC222 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

🔤овые рилс Хлои в инстаграм!! 🍨🍨 Спасибо, что пригласили меня @.saiebeauty 💜 Проведи день со мной! Спасибо @.chrismcmillanhair @.voeshny за подарки ✨ Мое воскресенье было полным с @.thedrybar @.themove.студией Сделала это🥐 Chloe Schnapp News

❤‍🔥4🥰3💘2😍1

Signed Алина*ੈ‧₊°

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @ChloeSchnappNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,090,624 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chloe Schnapp News” (@ChloeSchnappNews), 89 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChloeSchnappNews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.