Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Chiquitita|奇苦迭塔

Channel

Chiquitita|奇苦迭塔

@Chiquitita_Researches

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

251subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002036262878
TypeChannel
Username@Chiquitita_Researches
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Chiquitita_Researches

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2492512509 August 2026 — 249 subscribers9 August 2026 — 249 subscribers17 September 2026 — 251 subscribers9 August 202617 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 40 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 249–251 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 22:16251+2
9 Aug 2026, 19:21249no change
9 Aug 2026, 09:30249first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2884.8%
❤515.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC115 viewsread 9 August 2026

找了个 TeraScale 2 架构的垃圾卡先用着了,估计后面换一张 RX550 会更好点

29 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC136 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

提问一下玩信创的各位,给龙芯全系找个亮机卡,除去那个狗屎一样的桥片集显,除去景嘉微、摩尔线程、砺算,是不是只能用 AMD?

🔥4

8 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC333 viewsread 9 August 2026

GLM-5.2 真的值吗?智谱官方不放号,一群人跑去挤占其他提供商,把几个大厂的 Plan 全给挤爆了。 问题是我真的用了一趟怎么感觉还不如 GPT-5.5...?

18 Dec 2025, 15:33 UTC≈1,270 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

说一个暴论,我发现我可能已经理解不了某些 LCD 党的脑回路,也没有办法和他们交流了。 放到2025年,如今全新的 OLED 设备,在市的也就 iPhone SE 3,vivo Y300T这一类,可是你让部分激进的 LCD 用户去买的话他们是万万不接受的。 你给他们推荐 iPhone SE 3,他们觉得它屏幕太小,续航太差,充电太慢,信号太差,还没有 3.5mm 耳机孔;你给他们推荐 vivo Y300T ,他们觉得显示太模糊,即便是某些LCD党心中的一代“神机” Redmi Note 11/12T Pro,都有人觉得它系统卡顿,更新少(不给更新的 MTK: 还想怎样?),12T Pro 屏幕材质降级这样的事情。 于是他们便分成了三派,一部分用户抱着从旧到新,从华为 Mate 20 到 vivo Y300T 的手机,并且坚持不换 OLED;一部分用户选择改变不了环境就来改变自己,一边用着现代高频 PWM 或者类 DC 调光加持下…

❤1

12 Dec 2025, 02:20 UTC≈1,310 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

搞密码验证的在逼用户上 2FA,搞 2FA 的在逼用户上 MFA,搞 MFA 的在逼用户上 passkey,这是什么世道?

🔥7

8 Dec 2025, 10:59 UTC973 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

突然感觉我是不是对 DECO*27 这人产生审美疲劳甚至是厌恶了?为什么他调的所有初音未来都是一个声音?为什么他的粉丝纯度这么高,甚至愿意为他用初音而不是 GUMI 去翻唱几首让他跻升殿堂曲 P 主的曲子?

🔥5

27 Nov 2025, 14:30 UTC≈1,080 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

翻了 PC 发展史才知道,世纪初老黄用自家的显卡搞出来的低价图形工作站,成功把 SGI 搞死了。也许现在的老黄也在暗自害怕,如果哪天市场上出现了个超低成本的 AI 训练、调参和运行方案,估计自己也会走上 SGI 的老路吧。

🔥7

21 Jul 2025, 15:44 UTC≈1,690 viewsread 9 August 2026

跟去日本入境盖再入国章的人没什么好聊的.jpg 我们都是贴上陆许可的.jpg

21 Jul 2025, 05:49 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 9 August 2026

玩完 DR 第三章之后感觉 Tenna 也挺可怜的,只是希望 Kris 能多看看它,结果却变成了呼啸骑士的牺牲品,被拆拆臂。。。

20 Jul 2025, 12:35 UTC≈1,520 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

有时候真烦什么东西评论区下面都要刷个 PDD 用券多少多少拿下,还可以更便宜的。如果这些人家里私人了是不是还要现杀一个凑券满减?

❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Chiquitita_Researches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Matsuridayo GitHub
@MatsuriDayo · 45,413
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chiquitita|奇苦迭塔” (@Chiquitita_Researches), 251 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chiquitita_Researches.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.