Channel
@ChildhoodVaxInfoAndHealingAU
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
456subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001263776750 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ChildhoodVaxInfoAndHealingAU |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ChildhoodVaxInfoAndHealingAU |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 456 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 454 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 456 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:50 | 457 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 457 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
34 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 11 | 32.4% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 17.6% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 14.7% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 11.8% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
If a car seat company couldn’t be sued for a defective product that injured or killed children… would you still put your baby in it? Vaccine manufacturers have been protected from almost all lawsuits since 1986. Same product. Same risk to children. Zero accountability. They took away the one thing that keeps every other industry honest.
PEANUT ALLERGY EXPLOSION: Ever wonder why peanut allergy blew up over the last 30 years? In 1964 Merck produced Adjuvant 65 that contained 65% peanut oil plus Arlasel A, aluminum stearate. Beginning in the 1970s, INJECTING peanut oil became common in vaccines. https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel
❤1
PARENTS: THIS IS WHAT GETS INJECTED INTO YOUR CHILD’S BODY IN THE FIRST 6 YEARS OF LIFE 💉☠️💉 If you follow the full childhood vaccine schedule, your baby receives all of this — cumulative amounts delivered straight into their bloodstream: • 17,500 mcg 2-phenoxyethanol (antifreeze) • 5,700 mcg aluminum (neurotoxin) • Unknown amounts of fetal bovine serum (aborted cow blood) • 801.6 mcg formaldehyde (carcinogen, emba…
🤯1
According to this study, when baby monkeys received the US childhood vaccination schedule, they developed autism.. The full study ⬇️ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20628439/ Also read "Miller's Review of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchers" – you can find it on Amazon! But vaccines can't cause autism right?? When you realize how much information has b…
CDC admits a 36% Greater Risk of Asthma in Kids exposed to aluminium which is in the Covid shots as well as all other childhood vaccines Aluminium is a adjuvant found in most childhood vaccines, especially recombinant genetically modified vaccines Children who received the highest levels of aluminium in the first 2 years of life were at least 36% more likely to contract persistent asthma @DrPaulMarik
by Dr Judy Wilyman Is there comprehensive evidence for continually expanding Australia's vaccination program? Is combining multiple vaccines in the developing bodies of infants safe? Who is controlling the nation's vaccination program? In 2008, independent researcher, Dr Judy Wilyman, started a journey into possibly Australia's most controversial topic - to assess whether the vaccines being recommended today are sa…
https://youtu.be/RaYpuhUuQWQ?si=fBMzOLDcHGfx1R-X
Took my 16 year old for a doctor wellness checkup before starting school. He asked if I wanted him to have all of the vaccines he was missing. I said no. They brought in a paper for me to initial and sign by 12!!! Yes 12!! Vaccinations. They didn't mark the COVID box, so I did. At the bottom there's a place where it said Other. I wrote in NO BIOGENICS. The nurse looked at me strangely and asked what does that mea…
🔥4👏3👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
👍5
🔹THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS KNOW. THEY HAVE KNOWN SINCE 2014. A PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGIST JUST SENT US HIS RESIGNATION LETTER. READ IT. "To the Board of Directors, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. Effective immediately, I resign. I have spent 19 years in pediatric oncology. I have treated 2,300 children with cancer. I have watched 814 of them die. I am writing this letter because I cannot carry the weight of what I…
❤3🔥2
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ChildhoodVaxInfoAndHealingAU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Childhood Vaccine Information & Healing AU” (@ChildhoodVaxInfoAndHealingAU), 456 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChildhoodVaxInfoAndHealingAU.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.