Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐂h𝗲e𝘀e𝗰α𝗸e🩷𝗽r𝗼d

@Cheesecake_prod

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

105subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003935649977
TypeChannel
Username@Cheesecake_prod
DescriptionЧ𝘂зк𝗲йк — н𝗼вый იр𝗼дью𝗰с𝗲р в 𝗼нлαйн 𝘂ндy𝗰т𝗽и𝘂 к𝗼т𝗼𝗽ый ი𝗼дα𝗽𝘂т т𝗲б𝗲 н𝗲 т𝗼льк𝗼 𝗼тл𝘂чн𝗼𝗲 ი𝗽𝗼дв𝘂ж𝗲н𝘂𝗲, н𝗼 𝘂 𝘆ютн𝘆ю αт𝗺о𝗰ф𝗲𝗽у
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 8 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/Cheesecake_prod

Growth

105106105.57 August 2026 — 106 subscribers8 August 2026 — 105 subscribers9 August 2026 — 105 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105–106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 09:01105no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:56105-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:15106first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
88.1%
avg views ÷ 105 subscribers
Avg views / post
92.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026
Posts held20 (8 July 202618 July 2026)
Views total185
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
23
Videos
3
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51930213567483282141821.2%
custom 54699719161251293361618.8%
custom 51927039672550872401517.6%
💘1011.8%
custom 519051904437716968567.06%
custom 526702614292937381467.06%
custom 527180922037365717255.88%
🐳55.88%
👀44.71%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC93 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Простите что не активила всё это время, я на данный момент в россии и у меня не работал телеграмм от слова совсем, я пыталась подключить впн или прокси но ничего не подключалось и только сейчас смогла подключить прокси но я не уверена что он долго продержится так как у мпеня какая-то проблема с телефоном и к нему подключить хоть что-то просто нереально

custom 54699719161251293365

14 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC132 viewsread 9 August 2026

Сегодня я активить к сожалению не смогу так-как до вечера буду в самолёте и как только приеду домой сразу лягу спать

14 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC131 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Ваша любимая игра в рб ( из моих любимых )

  1. M.E.G.9%
  2. Animal Hospital30%
  3. Tower of hell52%
  4. Evade26%
  5. Моя кнопка17%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 51927039672550872402custom 51930213567483282142custom 52670261429293738141

14 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC113 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 51927039672550872403custom 51905190443771696851custom 52670261429293738141

12 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC113 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Всем пр !! Я уже написала сценарий для нового видео и в скором времени запишу его, смонтрую и выложу !! Надеюсь вам понравится данный формат видео, если вы прям хорошо поактивите, я выпущу ещё несколько подобных видео

custom 51930213567483282146👀2custom 51927039672550872402custom 54699719161251293362💘1

11 Jul 2026, 09:17 UTC198 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🎀🎀t𝗵e 𝐂h𝗲e𝘀e𝗰α𝗸e 🌟 𝗽r𝗼d🎀 🎀 𝐘𝗼u✨𝗺α𝗸е m𝗲 𝘀m𝗶l𝗲🎀 🎀у меня✈️вышло новое видео в тт !! Бежим🌟смотреть !! 🎀 🎀𝐍𝗲w 𝗷eαიs🌟d𝗼 y𝗼u 𝘀e𝗲 ?🎀 🎀𝐀𝘂d𝗶ti𝗼ი ( 11O ) 🧢 & 𝗶ი𝗳o🎀 🎀𝗹𝗼v𝗲 𝗺e, 𝗹o𝘃e🌟m𝗲, 𝘀α𝘆 t𝗵α𝘁 🎀 🎀y𝗼u🌟𝗹𝗼v𝗲 𝗺e🎀 🎀 𝐂h𝗲e𝘀e𝗰α𝗸e 𝗽r𝗼d 🎀

🐳3💘2custom 51905190443771696852custom 51927039672550872402custom 52670261429293738142custom 52718092203736571722custom 54699719161251293362

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Cheesecake_prod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

Ваша любимая игра в рб ( из моих любимых )

  1. M.E.G.9%
  2. Animal Hospital30%
  3. Tower of hell52%
  4. Evade26%
  5. Моя кнопка17%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 18 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 648,411 of 1,176,613entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐂h𝗲e𝘀e𝗰α𝗸e🩷𝗽r𝗼d” (@Cheesecake_prod), 105 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cheesecake_prod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.